Literature DB >> 21362706

An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.

Georg Heinze1, Peter Jüni.   

Abstract

The assessment of treatment effects from observational studies may be biased with patients not randomly allocated to the experimental or control group. One way to overcome this conceptual shortcoming in the design of such studies is the use of propensity scores to adjust for differences of the characteristics between patients treated with experimental and control interventions. The propensity score is defined as the probability that a patient received the experimental intervention conditional on pre-treatment characteristics at baseline. Here, we review how propensity scores are estimated and how they can help in adjusting the treatment effect for baseline imbalances. We further discuss how to evaluate adequate overlap of baseline characteristics between patient groups, provide guidelines for variable selection and model building in modelling the propensity score, and review different methods of propensity score adjustments. We conclude that propensity analyses may help in evaluating the comparability of patients in observational studies, and may account for more potential confounding factors than conventional covariate adjustment approaches. However, bias due to unmeasured confounding cannot be corrected for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21362706     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  113 in total

1.  Impairment of activities of daily living and incident heart failure in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  C Barrett Bowling; Gregg C Fonarow; Kanan Patel; Yan Zhang; Margaret A Feller; Xuemei Sui; Steven N Blair; Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan; Inmaculada B Aban; Thomas E Love; Richard M Allman; Ali Ahmed
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 2.  Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Radley C Sheldrick; Jessica K Paulus; Mei Chung; Vasileia Varvarigou; Haseeb Jafri; Jeremy A Rassen; Thomas A Trikalinos; Georgios D Kitsios
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  STEMI mortality in community hospitals versus PCI-capable hospitals: results from a nationwide STEMI network programme.

Authors:  Marc J Claeys; Peter R Sinnaeve; Carl Convens; Philippe Dubois; Jean Boland; Pascal Vranckx; Sofie Gevaert; Antoine de Meester; Patrick Coussement; Herbert De Raedt; Christophe Beauloye; Marc Renard; Christiaan Vrints; Patrick Evrard
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-04

4.  The pattern recognition molecule collectin-L1 in critically ill children.

Authors:  Catherine Ingels; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Inge Derese; Lisbeth Jensen; Pieter J Wouters; Steffen Thiel; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Application of inverse probability weights in survival analysis.

Authors:  Guoqiao Wang; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prognostic value of heart rate response during regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Tania Campagnoli; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Marwan Wassouf; Amjad Ali; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Comparing a marginal structural model with a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the effect of time-dependent drug use in observational studies: statin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease as an example from the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Catherine E de Keyser; Maarten J G Leening; Silvana A Romio; J Wouter Jukema; Albert Hofman; M Arfan Ikram; Oscar H Franco; Theo Stijnen; Bruno H Stricker
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  What can comparative effectiveness research, propensity score and registry study bring to Chinese medicine?

Authors:  Xing Liao; Yan-ming Xie
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Renato Cuocolo; Stefania Daniele; Valeria Cantoni; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for T4 colon cancer: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Giulio Cesare Vitali; Francesco Brunetti; Charles-Henri Wassmer; Charlotte Gagniere; Giacomo Puppa; Christophe Tournigand; Frédéric Ris
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.