| Literature DB >> 27271980 |
Antonio Luque-Casado1,2,3, Pandelis Perakakis1,4, Luis F Ciria1,2, Daniel Sanabria1,2.
Abstract
Maintaining vigilance over long periods of time is especially critical in performing fundamental everyday activities and highly responsible professional tasks (e.g., driving, performing surgery or piloting). Here, we investigated the role of aerobic fitness as a crucial factor related to the vigilance capacity. To this end, two groups of young adult participants (high-fit and low-fit) were compared in terms of reaction time (RT) performance and event-related heart rate responses in a 60' version of the psychomotor vigilance task. The results showed shorter RTs in high-fit participants, but only during the first 24' of the task. Crucially, this period of improved performance was accompanied by a decelerative cardiac response pattern present only in the high-fit group that also disappeared after the first 24'. In conclusion, high aerobic fitness was related to a pattern of transient autonomic responses suggestive of an attentive preparatory state that coincided with improved behavioural performance, and that was sustained for 24'. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the role of the autonomic nervous system reactivity in the relationship between fitness and cognition in general, and sustained attention in particular.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27271980 PMCID: PMC4897647 DOI: 10.1038/srep27556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mean and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of descriptive and fitness data for the high-fit and low-fit groups.
| High-fit | Low-fit | |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropometrical characteristics | ||
| Sample size | 23 | 21 |
| Age (years) | 23 [21, 24] | 23 [22, 24] |
| Height (cm) | 1.77 [1.75, 1.79] | 1.78 [1.75, 1.81] |
| Weight (kg) | 69.4 [67.0, 71.9] | 77.3 [69.4, 85.9] |
| Body Mass Index (kg·(m2)−1) | 22.2 [21.5, 22.9] | 24.2 [22.2, 26.3] |
| Baseline cardiac parameters | ||
| Average IBI (ms) | 1005.1 [931.9, 1078.7] | 758.0 [719.3, 799.1] |
| rMSSD (ms) | 59.7 [45.0, 76.2] | 35.9 [28.3, 44.1] |
| HF (ms2) | 1749.1 [918.4, 2843.3] | 885.6 [526.5, 1319.9] |
| Fitness test parameters | ||
| Time to VAT (s) | 1291 [1186.7, 1392.8] | 471 [407.4, 536.1] |
| VO2 (mL·min−1·kg−1) at VAT | 43.8 [40.6, 47.2] | 18.8 [16.7, 21.0] |
| Relative power output at VAT (W·kg−1) | 3.46 [3.16, 3.77] | 1.34 [1.18, 1.51] |
aOnly data of the participants included in the analyses are reported; IBI = inter-beat interval; rMSSD = the root-mean-square difference of successive normal R-R intervals; HF (ms2) = absolute power of the high-frequency spectral component (0.15 to 0.40 Hz); VAT = ventilatory anaerobic threshold.
Mean and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the behavioural and phasic cardiac responses (PCRs) data as a function of Group and Block.
| Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | Block 4 | Block 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-fit | |||||
| RTs (ms) | 259.8 [257.6, 262.0] | 274.2 [271.9, 276.5] | 282.1 [279.2, 285.1] | 294.7 [291.6, 298.0] | 302.2 [298.9, 305.5] |
| PCRs (ms) | 2.27 [0.19, 4.47] | 2.78 [0.42, 5.08] | −1.57 [−4.15, 1.14] | −4.05 [−6.70, −1.29] | −6.56 [−9.23, −3.81] |
| Low-fit | |||||
| RTs (ms) | 273.1 [270.4, 276.0] | 282.5 [279.4, 285.6] | 285.1 [282.0, 288.4] | 292.9 [289.0, 296.9] | 295.6 [292.0, 299.3] |
| PCRs (ms) | −3.20 [−4.63, −1.71] | −4.47 [−5.85, −2.98] | −4.78 [−6.11, −3.43] | −4.64 [−6.28, −3.01] | −5.83 [−7.52, −4.10] |
aWeighted heart period (ms) for 1 s epochs relative to cue onset and baseline-corrected taking 0.5 s pre-stimulus onset into account. Block1 (0–12 minutes); Block2 (12–24 minutes); Block3 (24–36 minutes); Block4 (36–48 minutes); Block5 (48–60 minutes).