| Literature DB >> 27271248 |
Benedikt L Nußbaum1,2, Oscar McCook3, Clair Hartmann4,3, José Matallo3, Martin Wepler4,3, Elena Antonucci5, Miriam Kalbitz6, Markus Huber-Lang6, Michael Georgieff4, Enrico Calzia3, Peter Radermacher3, Sebastian Hafner4,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reversible, depressed cardiac function is frequently encountered during septic shock and commonly called septic cardiomyopathy. Previous studies demonstrated reduced ejection fraction and left ventricular dilatation in both humans and animal models. However, the majority of the studies in humans excluded pre-existing cardiac disease and animal studies were performed on healthy specimen and/or without vasopressor support during sepsis. In order to more closely mimic the actual patients' conditions on intensive care units and to assess the influence of both cardiac comorbidity and vasopressor support on septic cardiomyopathy, we evaluated the left ventricular function in a porcine model of resuscitated septic shock with pre-existing atherosclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; CSE; Comorbidity; Left ventricular function; Nitrotyrosine; Septic cardiomyopathy; Septic shock; Ventricular dilatation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27271248 PMCID: PMC4894859 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-016-0089-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Hemodynamic data
| Baseline | 12 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 100 (90; 106) | 95 (89; 97) | 103 (94; 119) |
| Sepsis | 103 (91; 112) | 94 (89; 102)* | 71 (62; 101)*, ** |
| MPAP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 22 (20; 25) | 26 (24; 28) | 28 (24; 31)* |
| Sepsis | 23 (20; 26) | 31 (25; 41)* | 39 (32; 40)*,** |
| PAOP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 9 (7; 16) | 10 (9; 15) | 11 (7; 16) |
| Sepsis | 11 (6; 13) | 15 (9; 15) | 18 (16; 20)*,** |
| CVP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 8 (7; 13) | 9 (8; 14) | 10 (9; 17)* |
| Sepsis | 10 (6; 13) | 14 (9; 15) | 17 (14; 18)* |
| HR (beats/min) | |||
| Sham | 88 (73; 104) | 90 (82; 105) | 102 (68; 115) |
| Sepsis | 88 (74; 106) | 143 (114; 159)*,** | 156 (140; 166)*,** |
| Cardiac output (l/min) | |||
| Sham | 3.9 (3.4; 6.2) | 4.1 (3.7; 6.6) | 4.4 (2.9; 6.5) |
| Sepsis | 4.5 (3.5; 5.4) | 6.8 (5.8; 8.9)* | 6.3 (4.6; 10.8)* |
| SVR (dyn*s/cm5) | |||
| Sham | 1870 (1195; 2002) | 1636 (1075; 1861) | 1883 (1243; 2237) |
| Sepsis | 1734 (1515; 1833) | 961 (638; 1245)** | 806 (560; 917)*,** |
All data are medians (25; 75 percentile). Sham n = 5; sepsis n = 8
MAP mean arterial pressure, MPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure, PAOP pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, CVP central venous pressure, HR heart rate, SVR systemic vascular resistance
* p < 0.05 compared to baseline; ** p < 0.05 compared to sham group
Gas exchange, acid-base balance and glucose
| Baseline | 12 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterial pH | |||
| Sham | 7.46 (7.44; 7.46) | 7.43 (7.42; 7.45) | 7.44 (7.44; 7.46) |
| Sepsis | 7.45 (7.43; 7.48) | 7.46 (7.40; 7.48) | 7.35 (7.19; 7.42)*,** |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 35 (35; 39) | 37 (34; 38) | 35 (33; 36) |
| Sepsis | 38 (34; 40) | 38 (33; 40) | 38 (33; 42) |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 158 (142; 180) | 160 (144; 185) | 159 (138; 178) |
| Sepsis | 170 (161; 183) | 155 (129; 163) | 110 (71; 144)*,** |
| Horowitz index (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 495 (429; 536) | 484 (436; 552) | 484 (425; 528) |
| Sepsis | 550 (489; 574) | 477 (382; 505) | 225 (75; 388)*,** |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | |||
| Sham | 128 (114; 141) | 74 (69; 131)* | 77 (72; 125) |
| Sepsis | 115 (89; 119) | 76 (65; 96)* | 87 (72; 123) |
| Lactate (mmol/l) | |||
| Sham | 1.4 (1.0; 1.6) | 0.6 (0.4; 1.0) | 0.6 (0.6; 1.2) |
| Sepsis | 0.8 (0.6; 1.5) | 1.0 (0.7; 1.7) | 4.3 (1.9; 8.6)*, ** |
| Base excess (mmol/l) | |||
| Sham | 1.1 (0.8; 1.8) | -0.3 (-0.7; 0.7)* | -0.1 (-1.5; 0.7) |
| Sepsis | 1.5 (0.4; 2.3) | 1.7 (-0.7; 4.6) | -5.0 (-12.0; -2.9)*, ** |
All data are medians (25; 75 percentile). Sham n = 5, sepsis n = 8
* p < 0.05 compared to baseline; ** p < 0.05 compared to sham group
Cardiac data
| Baseline | 12 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVESP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 102 (92; 117) | 99 (91; 114) | 112 (87; 123) |
| Sepsis | 105 (86; 114) | 100 (89; 110) | 90; 67; 101)* |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | |||
| Sham | 14 (9; 19) | 14 (9; 20) | 18 (13; 23) |
| Sepsis | 11 (9; 17) | 17 (14; 20) | 18 (14; 21) |
| dp/dtmax (mmHg/s) | |||
| Sham | 1797 (1675; 2170) | 2573 (1412; 4028) | 2224 (1857; 3590) |
| Sepsis | 1571 (1341; 2025) | 4239 (1817; 4608)* | 3150 (1794; 5122)* |
| dp/dtmin (mmHg/s) | |||
| Sham | −2222 (−2473; −1904) | −2148 (−2423; −1293) | −2461 (−2748; −1246) |
| Sepsis | −1971 (−2257; −1735) | −2090 (−2436; −1743) | −2180 (−2719; −1556) |
| SV (ml) | |||
| Sham | 50 (46; 59) | 47 (45; 59) | 47 (43; 54) |
| Sepsis | 44 (39; 67) | 49 (39; 67) | 42 (31; 66) |
| EF (%) | |||
| Sham | 45 (44; 49) | 49 (44; 66) | 39 (34; 49) |
| Sepsis | 50 (41; 61) | 49 (34; 58) | 60 (40; 78) |
| LVESV (ml) | |||
| Sham | 59 (52; 65) | 49 (24; 75) | 75 (46; 104) |
| Sepsis | 37 (30; 80) | 53 (41; 109) | 31 (24; 44) |
| LVEDV (ml) | |||
| Sham | 116 (102; 129) | 105 (78; 137) | 131 (97; 168) |
| Sepsis | 94 (78; 118) | 99 (90; 204) | 86 (62; 114) |
| Tau (ms) | |||
| Sham | 28 (26; 35) | 27 (25; 41) | 26 (23; 45) |
| Sepsis | 28 (25; 38) | 21 (19; 26) | 18 (14; 23)*,** |
All data are medians (25; 75 percentile). Sham n = 5; sepsis n = 8
LVESP left ventricular end-systolic pressure, LVEDP left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, dp/dt maximal rate of pressure increase, dp/dt maximal rate of pressure decrease, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction, LVESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume
* p < 0.05 compared to baseline; ** p < 0.05 compared to sham group
Fig. 1Nitrotyrosine staining of heart specimen collected at the end of the experiment after 24 h. a Two representative histological images of sham (left) and septic (right) animals (×10 magnification). b Quantitative results of densitometric analysis. Data are presented as median (range). Sham n = 5, sepsis n = 8 animals
Fig. 2CSE (cystathionine γ-lyase) staining of the heart specimen collected at the end of the experiment after 24 h. a Two representative histological images of sham (left) and septic (right) animals (×10 magnification). b Quantitative results of densitometric analysis. Data are presented as median (range). Sham n = 5, sepsis n = 8 animals
Fig. 3Individual time course of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) of septic animals