Literature DB >> 27270698

Tools for Predicting the Functional Impact of Nonsynonymous Genetic Variation.

Haiming Tang1, Paul D Thomas2.   

Abstract

As personal genome sequencing becomes a reality, understanding the effects of genetic variants on phenotype-particularly the impact of germline variants on disease risk and the impact of somatic variants on cancer development and treatment-continues to increase in importance. Because of their clear potential for affecting phenotype, nonsynonymous genetic variants (variants that cause a change in the amino acid sequence of a protein encoded by a gene) have long been the target of efforts to predict the effects of genetic variation. Whole-genome sequencing is identifying large numbers of nonsynonymous variants in each genome, intensifying the need for computational methods that accurately predict which of these are likely to impact disease phenotypes. This review focuses on nonsynonymous variant prediction with two aims in mind: (1) to review the prioritization methods that have been developed to date and the principles on which they are based and (2) to discuss the challenges to further improving these methods.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic variation; human disease; phenotypic effects; protein mutation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27270698      PMCID: PMC4896183          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.190033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  117 in total

1.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  VariBench: a benchmark database for variations.

Authors:  Preethy Sasidharan Nair; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins.

Authors:  W M Fitch
Journal:  Syst Zool       Date:  1970-06

4.  Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants.

Authors:  Janita Thusberg; Ayodeji Olatubosun; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 5.  Somatic mosaicism: implications for disease and transmission genetics.

Authors:  Ian M Campbell; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  BeAtMuSiC: Prediction of changes in protein-protein binding affinity on mutations.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Jean Marc Kwasigroch; Marianne Rooman; Dimitri Gilis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function.

Authors:  Yana Bromberg; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  ChroMoS: an integrated web tool for SNP classification, prioritization and functional interpretation.

Authors:  Maxim Barenboim; Thomas Manke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution.

Authors:  Jamie T Bridgham; Eric A Ortlund; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  34 in total

1.  Quantitative Missense Variant Effect Prediction Using Large-Scale Mutagenesis Data.

Authors:  Vanessa E Gray; Ronald J Hause; Jens Luebeck; Jay Shendure; Douglas M Fowler
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 10.304

2.  Assessment of predicted enzymatic activity of α-N-acetylglucosaminidase variants of unknown significance for CAGI 2016.

Authors:  Wyatt T Clark; Laura Kasak; Constantina Bakolitsa; Zhiqiang Hu; Gaia Andreoletti; Giulia Babbi; Yana Bromberg; Rita Casadio; Roland Dunbrack; Lukas Folkman; Colby T Ford; David Jones; Panagiotis Katsonis; Kunal Kundu; Olivier Lichtarge; Pier L Martelli; Sean D Mooney; Conor Nodzak; Lipika R Pal; Predrag Radivojac; Castrense Savojardo; Xinghua Shi; Yaoqi Zhou; Aneeta Uppal; Qifang Xu; Yizhou Yin; Vikas Pejaver; Meng Wang; Liping Wei; John Moult; Guoying Karen Yu; Steven E Brenner; Jonathan H LeBowitz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Computational insights of K1444N substitution in GAP-related domain of NF1 gene associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 disease: a molecular modeling and dynamics approach.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar Agrahari; Meghana Muskan; C George Priya Doss; R Siva; Hatem Zayed
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 3.584

4.  Functional Assays Are Essential for Interpretation of Missense Variants Associated with Variable Expressivity.

Authors:  Karen S Raraigh; Sangwoo T Han; Emily Davis; Taylor A Evans; Matthew J Pellicore; Allison F McCague; Anya T Joynt; Zhongzhou Lu; Melis Atalar; Neeraj Sharma; Molly B Sheridan; Patrick R Sosnay; Garry R Cutting
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Integrated transcriptomic-genomic tool Texomer profiles cancer tissues.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Shaojun Zhang; Tae-Beom Kim; Yu-Yu Lin; Ramiz Iqbal; Zixing Wang; Vakul Mohanty; Kanishka Sircar; Jose A Karam; Michael C Wendl; Funda Meric-Bernstam; John N Weinstein; Li Ding; Gordon B Mills; Ken Chen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Molecular Genetic Basis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  A J Marian
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Predicting Genetic Variation Severity Using Machine Learning to Interpret Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Matthew D McCoy; John Hamre; Dmitri K Klimov; M Saleet Jafri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Assessing computational predictions of the phenotypic effect of cystathionine-beta-synthase variants.

Authors:  Laura Kasak; Constantina Bakolitsa; Zhiqiang Hu; Changhua Yu; Jasper Rine; Dago F Dimster-Denk; Gaurav Pandey; Greet De Baets; Yana Bromberg; Chen Cao; Emidio Capriotti; Rita Casadio; Joost Van Durme; Manuel Giollo; Rachel Karchin; Panagiotis Katsonis; Emanuela Leonardi; Olivier Lichtarge; Pier Luigi Martelli; David Masica; Sean D Mooney; Ayodeji Olatubosun; Predrag Radivojac; Frederic Rousseau; Lipika R Pal; Castrense Savojardo; Joost Schymkowitz; Janita Thusberg; Silvio C E Tosatto; Mauno Vihinen; Jouni Väliaho; Susanna Repo; John Moult; Steven E Brenner; Iddo Friedberg
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.700

9.  Classifying molecular phenotypes of G6PC variants for pathogenic properties and to guide therapeutic development.

Authors:  Kathleen L Plona; Jean F Eastman; Mitchell L Drumm
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2021-03-28

10.  Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast/Ovarian Cancer: Mysterious Signals From the Genome.

Authors:  Daniele Fanale; Alessia Fiorino; Lorena Incorvaia; Alessandra Dimino; Clarissa Filorizzo; Marco Bono; Daniela Cancelliere; Valentina Calò; Chiara Brando; Lidia Rita Corsini; Roberta Sciacchitano; Luigi Magrin; Alessia Pivetti; Erika Pedone; Giorgio Madonia; Alessandra Cucinella; Giuseppe Badalamenti; Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.