Ellen Grober1, Wenzhu Bi Mowrey2, Amy R Ehrlich3, Peter Mabie1, Steven Hahn4, Richard B Lipton1,2. 1. a Department of Neurology , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA. 2. b Department of Epidemiology and Population Health , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA. 3. c Division of Geriatrics of the Department of Medicine , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA. 4. d Department of Medicine , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Jacobi Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare two screening strategies for dementia in an urban primary care clinic, serving a low-education, minority community composed largely of Latino and African American patients. METHOD: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent two-stage patient-based screening (PBS) and informant-based screening (IBS) followed by a diagnostic evaluation. In the first stage, PBS included brief tests of episodic memory (Memory Impairment Screen), semantic memory (Animal Fluency), and executive function (Reciting Months Backwards). For IBS, the first stage consisted of the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, administered to a family member or friend. Patients who screened positive in the first stage of either strategy underwent testing with the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall to identify memory impairment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed for various cutoffs of each test and combination of tests. Dementia was diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria without access to the screening test results. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients (25.7%) with previously undiagnosed dementia. Sensitivity was the same (77%) for both strategies but specificity was higher for IBS than for PBS (92% versus 83%). IBS's higher specificity makes it the preferred strategy if a knowledgeable informant is available. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized dementia is common in primary care. Case-finding can be improved using either PBS or IBS two-stage screening strategies.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare two screening strategies for dementia in an urban primary care clinic, serving a low-education, minority community composed largely of Latino and African American patients. METHOD: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent two-stage patient-based screening (PBS) and informant-based screening (IBS) followed by a diagnostic evaluation. In the first stage, PBS included brief tests of episodic memory (Memory Impairment Screen), semantic memory (Animal Fluency), and executive function (Reciting Months Backwards). For IBS, the first stage consisted of the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, administered to a family member or friend. Patients who screened positive in the first stage of either strategy underwent testing with the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall to identify memory impairment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed for various cutoffs of each test and combination of tests. Dementia was diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria without access to the screening test results. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients (25.7%) with previously undiagnosed dementia. Sensitivity was the same (77%) for both strategies but specificity was higher for IBS than for PBS (92% versus 83%). IBS's higher specificity makes it the preferred strategy if a knowledgeable informant is available. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized dementia is common in primary care. Case-finding can be improved using either PBS or IBS two-stage screening strategies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic screener; Early dementia; Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test; Memory; Primary care
Authors: John E Morley; John C Morris; Marla Berg-Weger; Soo Borson; Brian D Carpenter; Natalia Del Campo; Bruno Dubois; Keith Fargo; L Jaime Fitten; Joseph H Flaherty; Mary Ganguli; George T Grossberg; Theodore K Malmstrom; Ronald D Petersen; Carroll Rodriguez; Andrew J Saykin; Philip Scheltens; Eric G Tangalos; Joe Verghese; Gordon Wilcock; Bengt Winblad; Jean Woo; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Andrea Bradford; Mark E Kunik; Paul Schulz; Susan P Williams; Hardeep Singh Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2009 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Ellen Grober; Amy R Ehrlich; Yaritza Troche; Steven Hahn; Richard B Lipton Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Hanna Kaduszkiewicz; Marion Eisele; Birgitt Wiese; Jana Prokein; Melanie Luppa; Tobias Luck; Frank Jessen; Horst Bickel; Edelgard Mösch; Michael Pentzek; Angela Fuchs; Sandra Eifflaender-Gorfer; Siegfried Weyerer; Hans-Helmut König; Christian Brettschneider; Hendrik van den Bussche; Wolfgang Maier; Martin Scherer; Steffi G Riedel-Heller Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mary Ganguli; Eric Rodriguez; Benoit Mulsant; Stephanie Richards; Rajesh Pandav; Joni Vander Bilt; Hiroko H Dodge; Gary P Stoehr; Judith Saxton; Richard K Morycz; Robert T Rubin; Barry Farkas; Steven T DeKosky Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Soo Borson; Lori Frank; Peter J Bayley; Malaz Boustani; Marge Dean; Pei-Jung Lin; J Riley McCarten; John C Morris; David P Salmon; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard G Stefanacci; Marta S Mendiondo; Susan Peschin; Eric J Hall; Howard Fillit; J Wesson Ashford Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: William Perry; Laura Lacritz; Tresa Roebuck-Spencer; Cheryl Silver; Robert L Denney; John Meyers; Charles E McConnel; Neil Pliskin; Deb Adler; Christopher Alban; Mark Bondi; Michelle Braun; Xavier Cagigas; Morgan Daven; Lisa Drozdick; Norman L Foster; Ula Hwang; Laurie Ivey; Grant Iverson; Joel Kramer; Melinda Lantz; Lisa Latts; Shari M Ling; Ana Maria Lopez; Michael Malone; Lori Martin-Plank; Katie Maslow; Don Melady; Melissa Messer; Randi Most; Margaret P Norris; David Shafer; Nina Silverberg; Colin M Thomas; Laura Thornhill; Jean Tsai; Nirav Vakharia; Martin Waters; Tamara Golden Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: William Perry; Laura Lacritz; Tresa Roebuck-Spencer; Cheryl Silver; Robert L Denney; John Meyers; Charles E McConnel; Neil Pliskin; Deb Adler; Christopher Alban; Mark Bondi; Michelle Braun; Xavier Cagigas; Morgan Daven; Lisa Drozdick; Norman L Foster; Ula Hwang; Laurie Ivey; Grant Iverson; Joel Kramer; Melinda Lantz; Lisa Latts; Shari M Ling; Ana Maria Lopez; Michael Malone; Lori Martin-Plank; Katie Maslow; Don Melady; Melissa Messer; Randi Most; Margaret P Norris; David Shafer; Nina Silverberg; Colin M Thomas; Laura Thornhill; Jean Tsai; Nirav Vakharia; Martin Waters; Tamara Golden Journal: Innov Aging Date: 2018-10-12