Heleen E M Feenstra1, Ivar E Vermeulen2, Jaap M J Murre3, Sanne B Schagen1. 1. a Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology , The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam , The Netherlands. 2. b Department of Communication Science , VU University Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands. 3. c Department of Psychology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Online neuropsychological test batteries could allow for large-scale cognitive data collection in clinical studies. However, the few online neuropsychological test batteries that are currently available often still require supervision or lack proper psychometric evaluation. In this paper, we have outlined prerequisites for proper development and use of online neuropsychological tests, with the focus on reliable measurement of cognitive function in an unmonitored setting. METHOD: First, we identified several technical, contextual, and psychological factors that should be taken into account in order to facilitate reliable test results of online tests in the unmonitored setting. Second, we outlined a methodology of quality assurance needed in order to obtain reliable cognitive data in the long run. RESULTS: Based on factors that distinguish the online unmonitored test setting from the traditional face-to-face setting, we provide a set of basic requirements and suggestions for optimal development and use of unmonitored online neuropsychological tests, including suggestions on acquiring reliability, validity, and norm scores. CONCLUSIONS: When properly addressing factors that could hamper reliable test results during development and use, online neuropsychological tests could aid large-scale data collection for clinical studies in the future. Investment in both proper development of online neuropsychological test platforms and the performance of accompanying psychometric studies is currently required.
OBJECTIVE: Online neuropsychological test batteries could allow for large-scale cognitive data collection in clinical studies. However, the few online neuropsychological test batteries that are currently available often still require supervision or lack proper psychometric evaluation. In this paper, we have outlined prerequisites for proper development and use of online neuropsychological tests, with the focus on reliable measurement of cognitive function in an unmonitored setting. METHOD: First, we identified several technical, contextual, and psychological factors that should be taken into account in order to facilitate reliable test results of online tests in the unmonitored setting. Second, we outlined a methodology of quality assurance needed in order to obtain reliable cognitive data in the long run. RESULTS: Based on factors that distinguish the online unmonitored test setting from the traditional face-to-face setting, we provide a set of basic requirements and suggestions for optimal development and use of unmonitored online neuropsychological tests, including suggestions on acquiring reliability, validity, and norm scores. CONCLUSIONS: When properly addressing factors that could hamper reliable test results during development and use, online neuropsychological tests could aid large-scale data collection for clinical studies in the future. Investment in both proper development of online neuropsychological test platforms and the performance of accompanying psychometric studies is currently required.
Keywords:
Online testing; cognition; neuropsychological test battery; test validity; unsupervised
Authors: Shifali Singh; Roger W Strong; Laneé Jung; Frances Haofei Li; Liz Grinspoon; Luke S Scheuer; Eliza J Passell; Paolo Martini; Naomi Chaytor; Jason R Soble; Laura Germine Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Victoria Leong; Kausar Raheel; Jia Yi Sim; Kriti Kacker; Vasilis M Karlaftis; Chrysoula Vassiliu; Kastoori Kalaivanan; S H Annabel Chen; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian; Zoe Kourtzi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stephanie Perin; Rachel F Buckley; Matthew P Pase; Nawaf Yassi; Alexandra Lavale; Peter H Wilson; Adrian Schembri; Paul Maruff; Yen Ying Lim Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2020-06-26
Authors: Lenja Witlox; Sanne B Schagen; Michiel B de Ruiter; Mirjam I Geerlings; Petra H M Peeters; Emmie W Koevoets; Elsken van der Wall; Martijn Stuiver; Gabe Sonke; Miranda J Velthuis; Job A M van der Palen; Jan J Jobsen; Anne M May; E M Monninkhof Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Leonie N C Visser; Mark A Dubbelman; Merike Verrijp; Lisa Wanders; Sophie Pelt; Marissa D Zwan; Dick H J Thijssen; Hans Wouters; Sietske A M Sikkes; Hein P J van Hout; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2021-09-14
Authors: Rosa Backx; Caroline Skirrow; Pasquale Dente; Jennifer H Barnett; Francesca K Cormack Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 5.428