Literature DB >> 27265673

Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Alexandros Briasoulis1, Tesfaye Telila2, Mohan Palla2, Nestor Mercado2, Ashok Kondur2, Cindy Grines2, Theodore Schreiber2.   

Abstract

High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often offered to patients with extensive coronary artery disease, decreased left ventricular function, and co-morbid conditions that increase surgical risk. In these settings, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (PVADs) can be used for hemodynamic support. To assess the effects of PVAD use on mortality, myocardial infarction, and complication rates in patients undergoing high-risk PCI, we systematically searched the electronic databases, MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane for prospective controlled trials and cohort studies of patients that received hemodynamic support with PVADs for high-risk PCI. The primary outcome measures were 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day myocardial infarction rates, periprocedural major bleeding, and vascular complications. We included 12 studies with 1,346 participants who underwent Impella 2.5 L device placement and 8 cohort studies with 205 patients that received TandemHeart device for high-risk PCI. Short-term mortality rates were 3.5% and 8% and major bleeding rates were 7.1% and 3.6% with Impella and TandemHeart, respectively. Both devices are associated with comparable periprocedural outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk PCI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27265673     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial Impella® pump: results from the German Impella® registry.

Authors:  Stefan Baumann; Nikos Werner; Karim Ibrahim; Ralf Westenfeld; Fadi Al-Rashid; Jan-Malte Sinning; Dirk Westermann; Andreas Schäfer; Konstantinos Karatolios; Timm Bauer; Tobias Becher; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Min Suk Choi; Hunbo Shim; Yang Hyun Cho
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-22

3.  Trends, etiologies, and predictors of 90-day readmission after percutaneous ventricular assist device implantation: A national population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk; Byomesh Tripathi; Shuchita Gupta; Akanksha Agrawal; Sandeep Dayanand; Faisal Inayat; Chayakrit Krittanawong; Ali Raza Ghani; Mohammad Nour Zabad; Parasuram Melarcode Krishnamoorthy; Aman Amanullah; Gregg Pressman; Christian Witzke; Sean Janzer; Jon George; Sanjog Kalra; Vincent Figueredo
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Long-term outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: An observational study.

Authors:  Yi-Xiong Huang; Zheng-Ming Xu; Li Zhao; Yi Cao; Yu Chen; Yi-Gang Qiu; Ying-Ming Liu; Peng-Yu Zhang; Jiang-Chun He; Tian-Chang Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 1.534

6.  Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; T A Meijers; S H Hofma; A J van Boven; A Nap; A Vonk; P Symersky; K D Sjauw; P Knaapen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.380

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.