Literature DB >> 27263831

Evaluation of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for detecting microbial DNA in blood culture bottles using PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay.

Jungho Kim1, Hye-Young Wang2, Seoyong Kim1, Soon Deok Park3, Kwangmin Yu1, Hyo Youl Kim4, Young Uh5, Hyeyoung Lee6.   

Abstract

DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 10(3)CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 10(3)CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 10(4)CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Blood culture; DNA extraction; Hybridization; Molecular diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27263831     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  3 in total

1.  Development of a Rapid Reverse Blot Hybridization Assay for Detection of Clinically Relevant Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Blood Cultures Testing Positive for Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Hye-Young Wang; Gilsung Yoo; Juwon Kim; Young Uh; Wonkeun Song; Jong Bae Kim; Hyeyoung Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Development and evaluation of serotype-specific recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick assays for the diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A, O and Asia1.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Peili Hou; Guimin Zhao; Li Yu; Yu-Wei Gao; Hongbin He
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.

Authors:  P Lewis White; Jessica S Price; Alan Cordey; Matthijs Backx
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2021-06-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.