Literature DB >> 27261409

Multilevel factors associated with long-term adherence to screening mammography in older women in the U.S.

Rebecca A Hubbard1, Ellen S O'Meara2, Louise M Henderson3, Deirdre Hill4, Dejana Braithwaite5, Jennifer S Haas6, Christoph I Lee7, Brian L Sprague8, Jennifer Alford-Teaster9, Anna N A Tosteson10, Karen J Wernli11, Tracy Onega9.   

Abstract

In the U.S., guidelines recommend that women continue mammography screening until at least age 74, but recent evidence suggests declining screening rates in older women. We estimated adherence to screening mammography and multilevel factors associated with adherence in a longitudinal cohort of older women. Women aged 66-75years receiving screening mammography within the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium were linked to Medicare claims (2005-2010). Claims data identified baseline adherence, defined as receiving subsequent mammography within approximately 2years, and length of time adherent to guidelines. Characteristics associated with adherence were investigated using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Analyses were stratified by age to investigate variation in relationships between patient factors and adherence. Among 49,775 women, 89% were adherent at baseline. Among women 66-70years, those with less than a high school education were more likely to be non-adherent at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.33) and remain adherent for less time (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.11-1.80) compared to women with a college degree. Women with ≥1 versus no Charlson co-morbidities were more likely to be non-adherent at baseline (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.31-1.62) and remain adherent for less time (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.24-1.66). Women aged 71-75 had lower adherence overall, but factors associated with non-adherence were similar. In summary, adherence to guidelines is high among Medicare-enrolled women in the U.S. receiving screening mammography. Efforts are needed to ensure that vulnerable populations attain these same high levels of adherence.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Breast cancer; Mammography; Medicare; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27261409      PMCID: PMC4969188          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  32 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Helen I Meissner; Stephen H Taplin; Florence K Tangka; Jasmin A Tiro; Timothy S McNeel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Screening Mammography Rates in the Medicare Population before and after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guideline Change: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Miao Jiang; Danny R Hughes; Richard Duszak
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  Recent trends in adherence to continuous screening for breast cancer among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Miao Jiang; Danny R Hughes; Catherine M Appleton; Geraldine McGinty; Richard Duszak
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Targeting of mammography screening according to life expectancy in women aged 75 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Erica S Breslau; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Update on mammography trends: comparisons of rates in 2000, 2005, and 2008.

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Jane F Gentleman; Jeannine S Schiller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.

Authors:  Karen Blanchard; James A Colbert; Dhruv Puri; Joel Weissman; Beverly Moy; Daniel B Kopans; Emily M Kaine; Richard H Moore; Elkan F Halpern; Kevin S Hughes; Kenneth K Tanabe; Barbara L Smith; James S Michaelson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Uptake, Outcomes, and Costs in the United States: Challenges With Existing Data and Recommendations for Improvement.

Authors:  Ashish Rai; V Paul Doria-Rose; Gerard A Silvestri; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Xiaofei He; Karen E Schifferdecker; Elissa M Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Association of Rurality With Annual Repeat Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Carol Callaway-Lane; Michael E Matheny; Jason Denton; Jennifer A Robles; Robert S Dittus; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke; Pierre P Massion; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Mammography adherence in relation to function-related indicators in older women.

Authors:  Dongyu Zhang; Linn Abraham; Brian L Sprague; Tracy Onega; Shailesh Advani; Joshua Demb; Diana L Miglioretti; Louise M Henderson; Karen J Wernli; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske; John T Schousboe; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Dejana Braithwaite; Ellen S O'Meara
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program.

Authors:  Rasmi G Nair; Simon J Craddock Lee; Emily Berry; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.090

6.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Association of a Lung Screening Program Coordinator With Adherence to Annual CT Lung Screening at a Large Academic Institution.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Sageline LaBaze; Kim L Sandler; Alexis B Paulson; Carol Callaway-Lane; Eric L Grogan; Pierre P Massion; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.

Authors:  Erin A Hirsch; Anna E Barón; Betsy Risendal; Jamie L Studts; Melissa L New; Stephen P Malkoski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.240

10.  Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Demb; Tomi Akinyemiju; Isabel Allen; Tracy Onega; Robert A Hiatt; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.