Literature DB >> 27259639

[Preclinical models to establish innovative therapy strategies : Ex‑vivo assessment of head and neck tumor chemo- and immune responses].

G Wichmann1, A Dietz2.   

Abstract

The pharmacological treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is currently experiencing an expansion of the spectrum of targeting therapies. It can be expected that use of immune modulators, e.g., checkpoint-inhibitors, and their combination with chemotherapy will lead to a plethora of therapeutic options in the near future, from which the best one for the individual patient can be selected. HNSCCs are heterogeneous in their biology, and responses to chemotherapy are nonuniform and often only observable in subgroups. It would be valuable to know the chance of success of a particular treatment in advance. Evidence-based selection of the best individual treatment is difficult, since predictive biomarkers which are assessable prior to the treatment decision and reliably indicate the suitability of particular therapeutics are lacking. Pretherapeutic predictive ex-vivo chemoresponse testing of HNSCC biopsy specimens could enable identification of responders and allow a more suitable therapy regimen to be chosen for potential non-responders, without exposing them to likely ineffective therapy attempts. However, early ex-vivo assays failed regarding reliable prediction of therapeutic success, even with tolerable doses of pharmaceuticals and, in particular, their combinations. Predictive testing was hence deemed improper for the clinic. Improved methodology has now led to a reappraisal of predictive testing and its additional use in analysis of antitumor immune responses ex vivo. Here we describe recent advances and new results from ex-vivo chemoresponse testing of HNSCC and highlight their ability to facilitate establishment of innovative therapy strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoresponse; Drug response biomarkers; Head and neck neoplasms; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); Predictive testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27259639     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0160-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  28 in total

1.  The impact of stromal cell contamination on chemosensitivity testing of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Ralph Dollner; Christof Granzow; Burkhard M Helmke; Alexandra Ruess; Arno Schad; Andreas Dietz
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Simvastatin suppresses head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ex vivo and enhances the cytostatic effects of chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Matthaeus Stoehr; Christian Mozet; Andreas Boehm; Achim Aigner; Andreas Dietz; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  A decision support framework for genomically informed investigational cancer therapy.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Amber Johnson; Vijaykumar Holla; Ann Marie Bailey; Lauren Brusco; Ken Chen; Mark Routbort; Keyur P Patel; Jia Zeng; Scott Kopetz; Michael A Davies; Sarina A Piha-Paul; David S Hong; Agda Karina Eterovic; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Russell Broaddus; Elmer V Bernstam; Kenna R Shaw; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Hedgehog targeting by cyclopamine suppresses head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and enhances chemotherapeutic effects.

Authors:  Christian Mozet; Matthaeus Stoehr; Kamelia Dimitrova; Andreas Dietz; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Single-cycle induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy or surgery in patients with head and neck cancer: what are the best predictors of remission and prognosis?

Authors:  Sabine Semrau; Marlen Haderlein; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Lell; Walburga Wolf; Frank Waldfahrer; Michael Uder; Heinrich Iro; Torsten Kuwert; Rainer Fietkau
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Development of a miniaturized, improved nucleic acid precursor incorporation assay for chemosensitivity testing of human solid tumors.

Authors:  D H Kern; C R Drogemuller; M C Kennedy; S U Hildebrand-Zanki; N Tanigawa; V K Sondak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Integrative analysis of head and neck cancer identifies two biologically distinct HPV and three non-HPV subtypes.

Authors:  Michaela K Keck; Zhixiang Zuo; Arun Khattri; Thomas P Stricker; Christopher D Brown; Matin Imanguli; Damian Rieke; Katharina Endhardt; Petra Fang; Johannes Brägelmann; Rebecca DeBoer; Mohamed El-Dinali; Serdal Aktolga; Zhengdeng Lei; Patrick Tan; Steve G Rozen; Ravi Salgia; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Mark W Lingen; Michael D Story; K Kian Ang; Ezra E W Cohen; Kevin P White; Everett E Vokes; Tanguy Y Seiwert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Combined effects of lapatinib and cisplatin on colony formation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christoph Schrader; Andreas Boehm; Anett Reiche; Andreas Dietz; Andreas Diet; Christian Mozet; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Predicting resistance to platinum-containing chemotherapy with the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay in primary ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hans Neubauer; Maya Stefanova; Erich Solomayer; Christoph Meisner; Manfred Zwirner; Diethelm Wallwiener; Tanja Fehm
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Slice cultures from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a novel test system for drug susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance.

Authors:  M M Gerlach; F Merz; G Wichmann; C Kubick; C Wittekind; F Lordick; A Dietz; I Bechmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Preclinical models in head and neck tumors : Evaluation of cellular and molecular resistance mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment].

Authors:  A Affolter; J Hess
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Reduced Cytokine Release in Ex Vivo Response to Cilengitide and Cetuximab Is a Marker for Improved Survival of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Susan Cedra; Susanne Wiegand; Marlen Kolb; Andreas Dietz; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.