B Lapergue1, R Blanc2, P Guedin3, J-P Decroix4, J Labreuche5, C Preda6, B Bartolini2, O Coskun3, H Redjem2, M Mazighi7, F Bourdain4, G Rodesch3, M Piotin2. 1. From the Division of Neurology (B.L., J.-P.D., F.B.), Stroke Center, Foch Hospital, University Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Suresnes, France b.lapergue@hopital-foch.org. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (R.B., B.B., H.R., M.P.), Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (P.G., O.C., G.R.), Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France. 4. From the Division of Neurology (B.L., J.-P.D., F.B.), Stroke Center, Foch Hospital, University Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Suresnes, France. 5. Department of Biostatistics (J.L.), Univiversity of Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Santé Publique: Epidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France. 6. Laboratoire de Mathématiques Paul Painlevé (C.P.), Unité Mixte de Recherche CNRS 8524, Lille, France. 7. Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (M.M.), Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers is now the standard therapy for selected patients with ischemic stroke. The technique of A Direct Aspiration, First Pass Technique for the Endovascular Treatment of Stroke (ADAPT) appears promising with a high rate of recanalization. We compared ADAPT versus stent retrievers (the Solitaire device) for efficacy and safety as a front-line endovascular procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 243 consecutive patients with large intracranial artery occlusions of the anterior circulation, treated within 6 hours with mechanical thrombectomy by either ADAPT or the Solitaire stent. Th primary outcome was complete recanalization (modified TICI ≥ 2b); secondary outcomes included complication rates and procedural and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2012 to June 2014, 119 patients were treated with stent retriever (Solitaire FR) and 124 by using the ADAPT with Penumbra reperfusion catheters. The median baseline NIHSS score was the same for both groups (Solitaire, 17 [interquartile range, 11-21] versus ADAPT, 17 [interquartile range, 12-21]). Time from groin puncture to recanalization (Solitaire, 50 minutes [range, 25-80 minutes] versus ADAPT, 45 minutes [range, 27-70 minutes], P = .42) did not differ significantly. However, compared with the Solitaire group, patients treated with ADAPT achieved higher final recanalization rates (82.3% versus 68.9%; adjusted relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37; P = .022), though differences in clinical outcomes between the cohorts were not significant. Use of an adjunctive device was more frequent in the ADAPT group (45.2% versus 13.5%, P < .0001). The rate of embolization in new territories or symptomatic hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Front-line ADAPT achieved higher recanalization rates than the Solitaire device. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define the best strategy for mechanical thrombectomy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers is now the standard therapy for selected patients with ischemic stroke. The technique of A Direct Aspiration, First Pass Technique for the Endovascular Treatment of Stroke (ADAPT) appears promising with a high rate of recanalization. We compared ADAPT versus stent retrievers (the Solitaire device) for efficacy and safety as a front-line endovascular procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 243 consecutive patients with large intracranial artery occlusions of the anterior circulation, treated within 6 hours with mechanical thrombectomy by either ADAPT or the Solitaire stent. Th primary outcome was complete recanalization (modified TICI ≥ 2b); secondary outcomes included complication rates and procedural and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: From November 2012 to June 2014, 119 patients were treated with stent retriever (Solitaire FR) and 124 by using the ADAPT with Penumbra reperfusion catheters. The median baseline NIHSS score was the same for both groups (Solitaire, 17 [interquartile range, 11-21] versus ADAPT, 17 [interquartile range, 12-21]). Time from groin puncture to recanalization (Solitaire, 50 minutes [range, 25-80 minutes] versus ADAPT, 45 minutes [range, 27-70 minutes], P = .42) did not differ significantly. However, compared with the Solitaire group, patients treated with ADAPT achieved higher final recanalization rates (82.3% versus 68.9%; adjusted relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37; P = .022), though differences in clinical outcomes between the cohorts were not significant. Use of an adjunctive device was more frequent in the ADAPT group (45.2% versus 13.5%, P < .0001). The rate of embolization in new territories or symptomatic hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Front-line ADAPT achieved higher recanalization rates than the Solitaire device. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define the best strategy for mechanical thrombectomy.
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Werner Hacke; Jens Fiehler; Jeffrey L Saver; Hans-Christoph Diener; Martin Bendszus; Serge Bracard; Joseph Broderick; Bruce Campbell; Alfonso Ciccone; Antoni Dávalos; Stephen Davis; Andrew M Demchuk; Diederik Dippel; Geoffrey Donnan; David Fiorella; Mayank Goyal; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Chelsea S Kidwell; Charles Majoie; Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins; Peter Mitchell; J Mocco; Keith Muir; Raul G Nogueira; Wouter J Schonewille; Adnan H Siddiqui; Götz Thomalla; Thomas A Tomsick; Aquilla S Turk; Philip M White; Osama O Zaidat; David S Liebeskind; Rachel Fulton; Kennedy R Lees Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Raul G Nogueira; Helmi L Lutsep; Rishi Gupta; Tudor G Jovin; Gregory W Albers; Gary A Walker; David S Liebeskind; Wade S Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Albert J Yoo; Claus Z Simonsen; Shyam Prabhakaran; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Mohammad A Issa; Jennifer E Fugate; Italo Linfante; David S Liebeskind; Pooja Khatri; Tudor G Jovin; David F Kallmes; Guilherme Dabus; Osama O Zaidat Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wade S Smith; Gene Sung; Jeffrey Saver; Ronald Budzik; Gary Duckwiler; David S Liebeskind; Helmi L Lutsep; Marilyn M Rymer; Randall T Higashida; Sidney Starkman; Y Pierre Gobin; Donald Frei; Thomas Grobelny; Frank Hellinger; Dan Huddle; Chelsea Kidwell; Walter Koroshetz; Michael Marks; Gary Nesbit; Isaac E Silverman Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Johannes C Gerber; Dirk Daubner; Daniel Kaiser; Kay Engellandt; Kevin Haedrich; Angela Mueller; Volker Puetz; Jennifer Linn; Andrij Abramyuk Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Marion Boulanger; Bertrand Lapergue; Francis Turjman; Emmanuel Touzé; René Anxionnat; Serge Bracard; Michel Piotin; Benjamin Gory Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Johanna Maria Ospel; Ryan McTaggart; Nima Kashani; Marios Psychogios; Mohammed Almekhlafi; Mayank Goyal Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: D Byrne; J P Walsh; H Schmiedeskamp; F Settecase; M K S Heran; B Niu; A K Salmeen; B Rohr; T S Field; N Murray; A Rohr Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 3.825