| Literature DB >> 27256343 |
Ewa Kozela1,2, Ana Juknat3,4, Fuying Gao5, Nathali Kaushansky4, Giovanni Coppola5, Zvi Vogel3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous studies showed that the non-psychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD), ameliorates the clinical symptoms in mouse myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35-55-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis (MS) as well as decreases the memory MOG35-55-specific T cell (TMOG) proliferation and cytokine secretion including IL-17, a key autoimmune factor. The mechanisms of these activities are currently poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmune; Cannabidiol; Gene expression; Memory T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27256343 PMCID: PMC4891926 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-016-0603-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Number of gene transcripts affected in MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG cells in the presence or absence of CBD. mRNA prepared from TMOG cells co-cultured with APC and stimulated with MOG35-55 in the presence or absence of CBD was subjected to microarray analysis as described in Methods. a Number of differentially expressed transcripts that were either significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (green) across the different treatment conditions vs control untreated cells (p < 0.005). b Venn’s diagram illustrating the number of transcripts affected (up- and downregulation) by CBD, MOG35-55, or CBD+MOG35-55 treatments (p < 0.005) and their overlap
List of transcripts which expression is upregulated by MOG35-55 stimulation and this upregulation is suppressed by CBD (p < 0.005)
| Symbol | Gene name | Accession number | MOG alone [fold]$ | MOG+CBD [fold]$ | Change [%] | CBD alone [fold]$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytokines, chemokines, and receptors | ||||||
| Xcl1 | Chemokine (C motif) ligand 1 | NM_008510.1 | 30.0 | 15.3 | −49 % | 1.0 |
| Il3 | Interleukin 3 | NM_010556.2 | 25.4 | 7.2 | −72 % | 1.0 |
| Cxcl9 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 | NM_008599 | 7.4 | 5.4 | −27 % | 0.9 |
| Gpr83 | G protein-coupled receptor 83 | NM_010287 | 3.9 | 1.8 | −53 % | 0.9 |
| Il12a | Interleukin 12A | NM_008351 | 2.3 | 1.5 | −24 % | 0.9 |
| Cxcr1 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 1 (Il8ra, CD181) | NM_178241.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | −50 % |
|
| Il1b | Interleukin 1, beta | NM_008361 | 1.5 | 0.5 | −70 % |
|
| Ifngr1 | Interferon gamma receptor 1 | NM_10511.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | −60 % |
|
| Transcription factors and regulators | ||||||
| Ier3 | Immediate early response 3 | NM_133662.1 | 5.5 | 3.8 | −31 % | 1.3 |
| Atf3 | Activating transcription factor 3 | NM_007498.2 | 4.7 | 3.4 | −28 % | 1.1 |
| Nr4a3 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3 | NM_015743.1 | 4.1 | 3.2 | −22 % | 1.0 |
| Crem | cAMP responsive element modulator | NM_013498 | 1.9 | 0.9 | −50 % |
|
| TNF-family signaling elements | ||||||
| Tnfsf11 | Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11 ( | NM_011613.2 | 11.8 | 8.2 | −31 % | 0.9 |
| Tnfsf14 | Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 14 | NM_019418.1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | −30 % | 1.0 |
| Tnfrsf9 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 9 | NM_011612.2 | 4.2 | 3.3 | −21 % | 0.8 |
| Tnfrsf18 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 18 | NM_009400.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | −40 % |
|
| Signaling elements | ||||||
| Sphk1 | Sphingosine kinase | NM_011451 | 12.3 | 8.2 | −34 % | 1.0 |
| Amica1 | Adhesion molecule interacting with CXADR antigen | NM_001005421.2 | 5.0 | 3.9 | −21 % | 1.2 |
| Axud1 | Cysteine/serine-rich nuclear protein 1/TGF-beta induced apoptosis protein 3 | NM_153287.2 | 4.4 | 3.5 | −20 % | 0.9 |
| Cdk5r1 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activator 1 | NM_009871.2 | 3.9 | 3.1 | −20 % | 0.9 |
| Igfbp4 | Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 | NM_010517.2 | 2.3 | 1.1 | −50 % |
|
| Vps37b | Vacuolar protein sorting 37 homologue B | NM_177876.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | −60 % |
|
| Dgat1 | Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 | NM_010046.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | −60 % |
|
| Tubb2d | Tubulin, beta 2b | NM_023716.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | −50 % |
|
| Fdps | Farnesyl diphosphate synthase | NM_134469 | 0.8 | 0.4 | −50 % |
|
$The results are presented as fold change vs control (without MOG35-55 or CBD). Numbers in italics indicate a significant effect of CBD alone (p < 0.005) in non-stimulated TMOG
List of transcripts which expression is upregulated by MOG35-55 stimulation and not affected by CBD
| Symbol | Gene name | Accession number | MOG alone [fold]$ | MOG+CBD [fold]$ | CBD alone [fold]$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytokines | |||||
| Csf2 | Colony stimulating factor 2 | NM_009969.2 | 77.0 | 67.1 | 1.1 |
| Tnf | Tumor necrosis factor alpha | NM_013693.1 | 15.3 | 13.8 | 1.1 |
| Ifng | Interferon gamma | NM_008337.1 | 10.8 | 9.5 | 0.8 |
| Chemokines | |||||
| Ccl3 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 | NM_011337.1 | 54.1 | 48.6 | 0.9 |
| Ccl4 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 | NM_013652.1 | 40.2 | 37.3 | 0.9 |
| Cxcl10 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 | NM_021274.1 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 0.9 |
| Glycoproteins | |||||
| Sema7a | Semaphorin 7A (GPI membrane anchor) | NM_011352.2 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 0.8 |
| Transcription factors | |||||
| Egr2 | Early growth response 2 | NM_010118.1 | 20.1 | 18.9 |
|
| Egr1 | Early growth response 1 | NM_007913.2 | 10.7 | 11.7 |
|
| Tbx21 | T-box 21 | NM_019507.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
|
|
| |||||
| Ndrg1 | N-myc downstream regulated 1 | NM_010884.1 | 6.2 | 6.7 |
|
| Ifit3 | Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 | NM_010501.1 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 0.9 |
$The results are presented as fold change vs control (without MOG35-55 or CBD). Numbers in italics indicate a significant effect of CBD alone (p < 0.005)
List of genes which transcription is enhanced by CBD in TMOG cells (p < 0.005)
| Symbol | Gene name | Accession number | MOG alone [fold]$ | MOG+CBD [fold]$ | Change [%] | CBD alone [fold]$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOG35-55-upregulated and CBD-enhanced | ||||||
| Surface negative regulators | ||||||
| Lag3& | Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 | NM_008479.1 | 1.7 | 5.2 | +210 % |
|
| Btla | B and T lymphocyte associated | NM_177584.3 | 1.8 | 3.2 | +80 % |
|
| Cd69 | Cluster of Differentiation 69 | XM_132882.1 | 3.9 | 5.4 | +39 % |
|
| IFN-dependent transcripts | ||||||
| Rsad2 | Radical S-adenosyl methionine domain containing 2 | NM_021384.2 | 4.9 | 9.5 | +94 % |
|
| Trim30 | Tripartite motif-containing 30 | NM_009099 | 2.2 | 3.1 | +40 % | 1.1 |
| Mx2 | Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 | NM_013606 | 6.0 | 8.2 | +37 % | 1.0 |
| Irf4 | Interferon regulatory factor 4 | NM_013674.1 | 4.5 | 5.3 | +18 % |
|
| Signaling elements | ||||||
| Gbp11 | Guanylate binding protein 11 | NM_01039647.1 | 3.2 | 7 | +120 % | 1.1 |
| Ppic | Peptidylprolyl isomerase C | NM_008908.1 | 1.8 | 3.2 | +80 % |
|
| Tyki | Thymidylate kinase family LPS-inducible member | NM_020557.3 | 4 | 5.7 | +42 % | 1 |
| Tagap | T-cell activation RhoGTPase activating protein | NM_145968.1 | 4.7 | 6.4 | +35 % |
|
| Tnfsf8 | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 8 | NM_009403.2 | 2.2 | 2.9 | +31 % | 1.1 |
| Dusp6 | Dual specificity phosphatase 6 | NM_026268.1 | 3.4 | 4.3 | +26 % |
|
| Gfod1 | Glucose-fructose oxidoreductase domain containing 1 | NM_001033399.1 | 6.2 | 7.8 | +26 % | 1.0 |
| Nfatc1& | Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 | NM_16791 | 3.3 | 4 | +21 % |
|
| Only CBD upregulated | ||||||
| Anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory | ||||||
| Mt1 | Metallothionein 1 | NM_013602.2 | 0.5 | 2.3 | +330 % |
|
| Slc30a1 | Solute carrier family 30 (zinc transporter), member 1 | NM_009579 | 0.9 | 1.8 | +100 % |
|
| Mt2 | Metallothionein 2 | NM_008630.1 | 1 | 1.9 | +80 % |
|
| Negative regulators of T cell activity | ||||||
| Trat1 | T cell receptor associated transmembrane adaptor 1 | NM_198297 | 0.7 | 2.1 | +200 % |
|
| IFN-dependent transcripts | ||||||
| Ephx1 | Epoxide hydrolase 1 | NM_010145.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | +170 % |
|
| Ets2 | V-ets avian erythroblastosis virus | NM_011809.2 | 1.3 | 2.4 | +80 % |
|
| Signaling elements | ||||||
| Ddr1 | Discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 1 | NM_007584.1 | 1.1 | 3 | +170 % |
|
| Pitpnm2 | Phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, membrane-associated 2 | NM_011256.1 | 1.2 | 2.9 | +150 % |
|
| Gpnmb | Glycoprotein (transmembrane) nmb | NM_053110.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | +90 % |
|
| Asb2 | Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 2 | NM_023049.1 | 0.29 | 0.52 | +79 % |
|
| Slc3a2 | Solute carrier family 3 member 2 | NM_008577.2 | 1.3 | 2.3 | +70 % |
|
$The results are presented as fold change vs control (without MOG35-55 or CBD). Numbers in italics indicate a significant effect of CBD (p < 0.005) in non-stimulated TMOG. &result reported previously [25]
Fig. 2IPA-identified CBD-enriched functional terms in activated TMOG cells. a Genes forming “Proliferation of T lymphocytes” annotation found to be affected by CBD (b). Genes forming “Differentiation of Th17 cells” annotation found to be affected by CBD. The direction of change is color-coded with green implying downregulation and red implying upregulation. Log2 values expressing CBD-induced change vs MOG35-55-only-stimulated cells and respective p values are provided below each transcript name. Explanation of symbols is provided in the Legend
Fig. 3IPA gene network analysis of CBD effect in stimulated TMOG cells—Network 1. Network analysis of the genes which expression is significantly (p < 0.005) affected by CBD in MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG cells was performed using the IPA software as described in Methods. The network display, symbols, and biological relationships between the genes are explained in Fig. 2. Genes in grey were shown in the literature to interact with the colored gene products that appear in the scheme
MOG35-55-most-downregulated genes (p < 0.005) that are not affected by CBD
| Symbol | Definition | Accession | MOG alone [fold]$ | MOG+CBD [fold]$ | CBD alone [fold]$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Il17re | Interleukin 17 receptor E, variant 2 | NM_001034029.1 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 1.04 |
| Sytl2 | Synaptotagmin-like 2, variant 5 | NM_001040088.1 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 1.03 |
| Il17re | Interleukin 17 receptor E, variant 1 | NM_145826.2 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 1.11 |
| Tmem176a | Transmembrane protein 176A | NM_025326.2 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 1.07 |
| Ian3 | Immune associated nucleotide 3 | NM_146167.2 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Klrd1 | Killer cell lectin-like receptor, subfamily D, member1 | NM_010654.1 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.95 |
| Klri2 | Killer cell lectin-like receptor family I member 2 | NM_177155.2 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Sit1 | Suppression inducing transmembrane adaptor 1 | NM_019436.1 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.84 |
| Il17rc | Interleukin 17 receptor C | NM_134159.2 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.95 |
| Golph2 | Type II Golgi transmembrane protein | NM_027307 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
$The results are presented as fold change vs control (without MOG35-55 or CBD)
IPA-identified “top canonical pathways” enriched by CBD treatment in stimulated TMOG cells
| Canonical pathways | Annotated genes |
|
|---|---|---|
| IL-10 signaling |
| 0.0039 |
| IL-6 signaling |
| 0.0042 |
| cAMP-mediated signaling |
| 0.024 |
| IGF-1 signaling |
| 0.015 |
| Fcγ receptor mediated phagocytosis in macrophages and monocytes |
| 0.012 |
| Superpathway of cholesterol biosynthesis |
| 0.016 |
| T helper cell differentiation |
| 0.042 |
Fig. 4IPA gene network analysis of the CBD modulation of stimulated TMOG cells—Network 2. See Figs. 2 and 3 for details
Fig. 5ELISA of IL-1β and IL-3 cytokines released from MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG cells in the presence or absence of CBD. APC/TMOG were stimulated with MOG35-55 at 5 μg/ml for 24 h in the presence or absence of CBD at 5 μM and the amounts of (a) IL-1β and (b) IL-3 in the culture media determined. 100 % is equivalent to maximal MOG35-55 effect which refers to 15 ± 6 pg/ml for IL-1β and to 377 ± 100 pg/ml for IL-3. Statistics (one way ANOVA) and symbols: a F(3,6) = 6.7, p < 0.05. b F(3,15) = 80.25, p < 0.001; Symbols: # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.01 vs Control, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs MOG-35-55-stimulated cells
qPCR validation of various transcripts in mRNA prepared from MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG cells and the effect of CBD
| Symbol | Gene name | MOG alone [fold] $ | CBD+MOG [fold] $ | CBD alone [fold] $ | One-way ANOVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Chemokine (C Motif) Ligand 1 | 62.7 ± 0.7## | 17.9 ± 11.4** | 1.6 ± 0.1 | F(3,8) = 12.6, |
|
| Interleukin 12 | 4.3 ± 0.1# | 2.6 ± 0.3* | 0.8 ± 0.1 | F(3,8) = 6.0, |
|
| B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator | 2.8 ± 0.4## | 7.1 ± 0.4*** | 6.0 ± 0.5### | F(3,8) = 60.9, |
|
| Dual specificity phosphatase 6 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.7# | 1.9 ± 0.3 | F(3,8) = 3.3, p = 0.07 |
|
| Interferon regulatory factor 4 | 3.4 ± 0.6## | 7.9 ± 0.5*** | 3.7 ± 0.3## | F(3,8) = 43.3, |
|
| Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 | 11.5 ± 0.3### | 25.9 ± 2.3*** | 5.8 ± 1.5* | F(3,8) = 114, |
|
| Interleukin 10 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 3.4 ± 0.8# | 1.4 ± 0.3 | F(3,11) = 3.6, |
$Data are expressed as fold change vs control, not stimulated cells (equal to 1). # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.01 vs control TMOG cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs MOG-35-55-stimulated TMOG cells. &results reported previously [25]
Fig. 6WGCNA-clustered gene modules and their correlation to CBD effect in MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG cells. WGCNA analysis identifies distinct modules of coexpressed genes. a Dendrogram showing topological overlap of genes and their relation to modules which are color-coded below. b clustering of resulting modules. Color frames indicate the main modules that are positively (red frame) and negatively (green frame) correlated to CBD effect in MOG35-55-stimulated TMOG. c module-trait relationship plots showing Spearman’s correlation between module principal components (a.k.a. module eigengenes [ME]; in color-coded rows) and the treatments. The top value in each square represents the correlation coefficient between the ME and the treatment. The bottom value in parentheses is the relevant p value. Modules highly correlated with CBD+MOG35-55 treatment are emphasized using black frames