Literature DB >> 27255470

Acidemia in neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater - What are the outcomes?

Bethany A Sabol1, Aaron B Caughey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Apgar score is universally used for fetal assessment at the time of birth, whereas, the collection of fetal cord blood gases is performed commonly in high-risk situations or in the setting of Apgar scores of <7, which is a less standardized approach. It has been well-established that neonatal acidemia at the time of delivery can result in significant neonatal morbidity and death. Because of this association, knowledge of the fetal acid-base status and detection of acidemia at the time of delivery can serve as a sensitive and useful component in the assessment of a neonate's risk. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis is an accurate and validated tool for the assessment of neonatal acidemia at the time of delivery. Because the collection of fetal cord blood gases is not a standardized practice, it is possible that, with such a varied approach, some cases of neonatal acidemia are not detected, particularly in the setting of reassuring Apgar scores.
OBJECTIVE: In a setting of universally obtained cord blood gases, we sought to identify the rates of acidemia and associated factors in neonates with 5-minute Apgar scores of ≥7. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study identified all term, singleton, nonanomolous neonates with 5-minute Apgar scores of ≥7. The incidence of umbilical artery pH ≤7.0 or ≤7.1 and base excess ≤-12 mmol/L or ≤-10 mmol/L were examined overall and in association with obstetric complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Chi-squared tests were used to compare proportions, and multivariable logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders.
RESULTS: In this cohort, the incidence of an umbilical artery pH of ≤7.0 was 0.5%, of a pH ≤7.1 was 3.4%, of a base excess ≤-12 mmol/L was 1.4%, and of ≤-10 mmol/L was 4.0%. Rates of neonatal acidemia were greater in the setting of meconium (4.3% vs 3.2%; P<.001), placental abruption (13.2% vs 3.4%; P<.001), and cesarean deliveries (5.8% vs 2.8%; P<.001), despite normal 5-minute Apgar scores. Additionally, umbilical artery pH ≤7.0 was associated with an increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-14.3) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 6.8-17.4). Base excess of ≤-12 mmol/L was also associated with an increased risk of neonatal sepsis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-12.1). Finally, when examined together, neonates with both a pH of ≤7.0 and base excess of ≤-12 mmol/L continued to demonstrate an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission and respiratory distress syndrome, with adjusted odds ratios of 9.6 and 6.0, respectively. This risk persisted in neonates with a pH of ≤7.1 and base excess of ≤-10 mmol/L as well, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.5 and 1.1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Because neonates with reassuring Apgar scores have a residual risk of neonatal acidemia that is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes, the potential utility of obtaining universal cord blood gases should be further investigated.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apgar; acidemia; neonatal outcome; umbilical cord blood gas

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255470     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  [Predictive value of umbilical arterial cord pH on complications during hospitalization in neonates after cesarean section].

Authors:  J Bao; J Liu; Y Qu; D L Mu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 2.  Maternal, Labor, Delivery, and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Placental Abruption: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katheryne L Downes; Katherine L Grantz; Edmond D Shenassa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Relationship between immediate postpartum umbilical cord pH, fetal distress and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Wajeeha Syed; Nazia Liaqat; Qudsia Qazi; Sumaira Yasmeen
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Predictive Abilities of Fetal Electrocardiogram-Derived Parameters during Labor in Newborn Acidemia: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Ning Tian; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Foetal Morbidity Depending on the Day and Time of Delivery.

Authors:  Julia von Ehr; Nina Wiebking; Sudip Kundu; Constantin von Kaisenberg; Peter Hillemanns; Philipp Soergel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Category I caesarean delivery and preferred mode of anaesthesia: Dilemma persists.

Authors:  Sunanda Gupta; Alka Chhabra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11

7.  Association between Apgar scores of 7 to 9 and neonatal mortality and morbidity: population based cohort study of term infants in Sweden.

Authors:  Neda Razaz; Sven Cnattingius; K S Joseph
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-05-07

8.  Predict respiratory distress syndrome by umbilical cord blood gas analysis in newborns with reassuring Apgar score.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Bernardo; Rita De Santis; Maurizio Giordano; Desiree Sordino; Giuseppe Buonocore; Serafina Perrone
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.638

9.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Jasmin Lacevic; Tea Reljic; Iztok Hozo; Kelly S Gibson; Anthony O Odibo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can Obstetric Risk Factors Predict Fetal Acidaemia at Birth? A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Habiba Kapaya; Roslyn Williams; Grace Elton; Dilly Anumba
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.