Literature DB >> 31064770

Association between Apgar scores of 7 to 9 and neonatal mortality and morbidity: population based cohort study of term infants in Sweden.

Neda Razaz1, Sven Cnattingius2, K S Joseph3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 (versus 10) at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, and neonatal mortality and morbidity.
DESIGN: Population based cohort study.
SETTING: Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 1 551 436 non-malformed live singleton infants, born at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) between 1999 and 2016, with Apgar scores of ≥7 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. EXPOSURES: Infants with Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes were compared with those with an Apgar score of 10 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal mortality and morbidity, including neonatal infections, asphyxia related complications, respiratory distress, and neonatal hypoglycaemia. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusted rate differences (aRD), and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.
RESULTS: Compared with infants with an Apgar score of 10, aORs for neonatal mortality, neonatal infections, asphyxia related complications, respiratory distress, and neonatal hypoglycaemia were higher among infants with lower Apgar scores, especially at 5 and 10 minutes. For example, the aORs for respiratory distress for an Apgar score of 9 versus 10 were 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 2.1) at 1 minute, 5.2 (5.1 to 5.4) at 5 minutes, and 12.4 (12.0 to 12.9) at 10 minutes. Compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 10 minutes, the aRD for respiratory distress was 9.5% (95% confidence interval 9.2% to 9.9%) for an Apgar score of 9 at 10 minutes, and 41.9% (37.7% to 46.4%) for an Apgar score of 7 at 10 minutes. A reduction in Apgar score from 10 at 5 minutes to 9 at 10 minutes was also associated with higher odds of neonatal morbidity, compared with a stable Apgar score of 10 at 5 and 10 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: In term non-malformed infants with Apgar scores within the normal range (7 to 10), risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity are higher among infants with lower Apgar score values, and also among those experiencing a reduction in score from 5 minutes to 10 minutes (compared with infants with stable Apgar scores of 10). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31064770      PMCID: PMC6503461          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


Introduction

The most routinely used measure of health status of newborns is the Apgar score, typically quantified at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after birth.1 Our recent population based studies have shown that non-malformed term infants born with lower Apgar scores within the normal range (7 to 9) at 1, 5, or 10 minutes are at higher risk of adverse long term outcomes, such as epilepsy, cerebral palsy, having additional needs, and adverse child developmental health (compared with non-malformed term infants with an Apgar score of 10).2 3 4 Both the timing and the score are important: compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 5 and 10 minutes, an Apgar score of 9 at 5 minutes and an Apgar score of 9 at 10 minutes are both associated with an increased risk of cerebral palsy, with an Apgar score of 9 at 10 minutes conferring higher risk of cerebral palsy than an Apgar score of 9 at 5 minutes.3 The findings of differential risks associated with Apgar scores within the normal range are unexpected as it is commonly assumed that Apgar scores of 9 versus 10 are assigned arbitrarily. This belief is supported by international comparisons of Apgar scores, which show that the frequency of Apgar scores of 10 at 5 minutes vary from 8.8% in some countries to 92.7% in others.5 It is widely recognised that a low Apgar score, commonly defined as a score less than 7, is associated with increased risks of neonatal mortality,6 7 morbidity,8 9 10 and long term outcomes11 12 13 14 15 16; however, no previous study has investigated whether Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 are similarly associated with higher risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Quantifying associations between Apgar scores in the normal range and neonatal morbidity, such as neonatal infections, neonatal respiratory distress, and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy is important because such conditions are known risk factors for later neurodevelopmental adversity in children. In this population based study of more than 1.5 million infants born in Sweden, we evaluated associations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 (versus 10) at 1, 5, or 10 minutes and risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Methods

We based our study on singleton live births in Sweden between 1999 and 2016, with data obtained from the Medical Birth Register.17 This database contains information on antenatal, obstetrical, and neonatal care that is prospectively recorded on standardised forms for more than 98% of births in Sweden. The most recent extensive validation of the Medical Birth Register showed that coverage and validity of most variables were high.18 Using the person-unique national registration numbers of mothers and infants, we linked data from the Birth Register to several national registries. The nationwide National Patient Register19 20 includes diagnostic codes on hospital in-patient care since 1987 and hospital out-patient care from 2001. We coded diagnoses in the patient and birth registers using the Swedish versions of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) from 1997 onwards. We obtained information on neonatal deaths from the National Cause of Death Register, which includes information on all deaths in Sweden since 1961.21 Information on maternal education and country of origin was obtained from the Education Register and the Total Population Register, respectively.22 23

Study population

We analysed data for 18 years (1999-2016), during which 1 834 641 singleton live births were recorded in the Birth Register. We excluded preterm infants (≤36 completed weeks’ gestation, n=94 545), infants with major congenital malformations (n=60 762), and records with missing data on maternal or infant identification numbers (n=25 658), leaving 1 653 676 term (≥37 completed weeks’ gestation) singleton, non-malformed infants. Complete information on Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes was available for 1 645 396 infants (99%), of whom 1 620 473 (98.5%) also had information on Apgar scores at 10 minutes. We restricted our study population to infants with Apgar scores of 7 to 10 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes (n=1 551 436). We obtained data on neonatal mortality and morbidity from nationwide Swedish registries: the Medical Birth Register and the Swedish patient and cause of death registers. Neonatal mortality was defined as infant deaths within the first 0-27 days after birth. Neonatal morbidity, assessed in the first 0-27 days after birth, included neonatal infections, asphyxia related neonatal complications (hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and related conditions, and neonatal convulsions/seizures), neonatal hypoglycaemia, and respiratory distress (see supplementary table A for specific ICD-10 codes). In Sweden, all women are offered an ultrasound scan at 18 weeks’ gestation or earlier for dating and screening for congenital abnormalities. In our study, we estimated gestational age (in completed weeks) using the following hierarchy: date of early second trimester ultrasonography (87.7%), date of last menstrual period (7.4%), or a postnatal assessment (4.9%). Among maternal characteristics, we retrieved information on age at delivery, country of origin, highest attained level of education, cohabitation with a partner, parity, height, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and smoking during pregnancy. Maternal age at delivery was calculated as date of delivery minus the mother’s birth date, and parity was defined as the number of births to each mother (including the index birth). BMI was calculated using weight measured at registration to antenatal care (wearing light indoor clothing) and self reported height. BMI was categorised according to the World Health Organization groups as underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), obesity grade 1 (30 to <35), obesity grade 2 (35 to <40), or obesity grade 3 (≥40.0).24 We obtained information on cohabitation with a partner during the first antenatal visit. Mothers who reported daily smoking at the first antenatal visit and/or at 30 to 32 weeks’ gestation were classified as smokers, whereas mothers who stated that they were non-smokers were classified as such. Information on induction of labour and mode of delivery was noted on the obstetric record at onset of labour and after delivery, respectively.

Statistical analyses

The frequency of each Apgar score value was calculated within categories of maternal and infant characteristics. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, or 9 (versus 10) at 1, 5, or 10 minutes and neonatal mortality and each neonatal morbidity. Results were expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. In the multivariable analyses, estimates were adjusted for maternal factors (age at childbirth, parity, country of birth, education, smoking, cohabitation with a partner, height and early pregnancy BMI) and birth characteristics of the infant (sex, gestational age in weeks, and year of birth). Lastly, the magnitude of absolute effects was quantified by calculating adjusted rate differences. The adjusted rate difference represents the number of excess cases of neonatal mortality and morbidity per 100 births among infants receiving an Apgar score of 7, 8, or 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes compared with infants receiving an Apgar score of 10. Two sided P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Supplementary analyses

Pregnancy and delivery complications are associated with increased risks of a low Apgar score (0 to 6) and neonatal morbidity.9 10 25 We therefore also quantified the association between risk factors, such as gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes, induction of labour, mode of delivery, and meconium aspiration (see supplementary table A for specific ICD-10 codes) and Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 (versus 10) at 1, 5, or 10 minutes. Logistic regression with the Apgar score of interest (eg, 5 minute Apgar score of 9 versus 10) as the dependent variable was used to obtain odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each risk factor.

Patient and public involvement

This study was based on analysis of information from linked databases and no patients were involved in designing the research question or the outcome measures, nor were they involved in developing plans for implementation of the study. No patients were asked to advise on interpretation or writing up of results.

Results

Only 11% (163 800/1 551 436) of infants had an Apgar score of 10 at 1 minute, whereas 89% (1 373 314/1 551 436) and 97% (1 501 605/1 551 436) had a score of 10 at 5 and 10 minutes, respectively. Apgar scores of 10 at 5 minutes were less common in offspring of mothers who were primiparous, born in Sweden, shorter (<159 cm), or very obese (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), and less common in those who delivered at 37 weeks’ and ≥42 weeks’ gestation. The frequency of an Apgar score of 10 at 5 minutes was also lower in boys compared with girls (table 1).
Table 1

Maternal and birth characteristics according to Apgar score at 5 minutes: term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999 to 2016. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

CharacteristicsTotal No (n=1 551 436)Apgar score at 5 mins
7 (n=3335)8 (n=20 913)9 (n=153 874)10 (n=1 373 314)
Maternal age (years):
 ≤1923 12750 (0.2)282 (1.2)2139 (9.2)20 656 (89.3)
 20-24198 475438 (0.2)2714 (1.4)18 913 (9.5)176 410 (88.9)
 25-29475 8601019 (0.2)6516 (1.4)47 785 (10.0)420 540 (88.4)
 30-34537 9041135 (0.2)7034 (1.3)53 528 (10.0)476 207 (88.5)
 ≥35316 070693 (0.2)4367 (1.4)31 509 (10.0)279 501 (88.4)
Parity:
 1669 2921951 (0.3)12 270 (1.8)70 176 (10.5)584 895 (87.4)
 2579 715907 (0.2)5717 (1.0)54 192 (9.3)518 899 (89.5)
 3212 387316 (0.1)2081 (1.0)20 614 (9.7)189 376 (89.2)
 ≥490 042161 (0.2)845 (0.9)8892 (9.9)80 144 (89.0)
Country of birth:
 Sweden1 208 3812654 (0.2)17 105 (1.4)127 091 (10.5)1 061 531 (87.8)
 Other Nordic countries25 01252 (0.2)344 (1.4)2546 (10.2)22 070 (88.2)
 Non-Nordic countries316 237619 (0.2)3452 (1.1)24 109 (7.6)288 057 (91.1)
 Missing180610 (0.6)12 (0.7)128 (7.1)1656 (91.7)
Education (years):
 ≤9137 826302 (0.2)1699 (1.2)12 315 (8.9)123 510 (89.6)
 10-11186 936400 (0.2)2415 (1.3)19 082 (10.2)165 039 (88.3)
 12400 534840 (0.2)5556 (1.4)40 138 (10.0)354 000 (88.4)
 13-14212 304454 (0.2)2897 (1.4)20 929 (9.9)188 024 (88.6)
 ≥15601 6241299 (0.2)8183 (1.4)60 483 (10.1)531 659 (88.4)
 Missing12 21240 (0.3)163 (1.3)927 (7.6)11 082 (90.7)
Smoking during pregnancy:
 No137 05762947 (0.2)18 678 (1.4)136 846 (10.0)1 212 105 (88.4)
 Yes120 616264 (0.2)1395 (1.2)11 470 (9.5)107 487 (89.1)
 Missing60 244124 (0.2)840 (1.4)5558 (9.2)53 722 (89.2)
Mother cohabits with partner:
 Yes1 394 6442978 (0.2)18 683 (1.3)139 471 (10.0)1 233 512 (88.4)
 No85266214 (0.3)1262 (1.5)8050 (9.4)75 740 (88.8)
 Missing71 526143 (0.2)968 (1.4)6353 (8.9)64 062 (89.6)
Maternal height (cm):
 ≤159191 299492 (0.3)2938 (1.5)19 241 (10.1)168 628 (88.1)
 160-164371 064883 (0.2)5335 (1.4)38 321 (10.3)326 525 (88.0)
 165-169430 854900 (0.2)5846 (1.4)43 272 (10.0)380 836 (88.4)
 ≥170480 148903 (0.2)5764 (1.2)45 720 (9.5)427 761 (89.1)
 Missing78 071157 (0.2)1030 (1.3)7320 (9.4)69 564 (89.1)
Maternal BMI:
 <18.533 67342 (0.1)350 (1.0)2608 (7.7)30 673 (91.1)
 18.5-24.9857 5011674 (0.2)10 666 (1.2)81 478 (9.5)763 683 (89.1)
 25-29.9356 678880 (0.2)5123 (1.4)37 291 (10.5)313 384 (87.9)
 30-34.9116 886290 (0.2)1925 (1.6)12 973 (11.1)101 698 (87.0)
 ≥3547 352150 (0.3)901 (1.9)5605 (11.8)40 696 (85.9)
 Missing139 346299 (0.2)1948 (1.4)13 919 (10.0)123 180 (88.4)
Infant sex:
 Boy784 7821785 (0.2)11 461 (1.5)84 045 (10.7)687 491 (87.6)
 Girl766 6541550 (0.2)9452 (1.2)69 829 (9.1)685 823 (89.5)
Gestational age (weeks):
 3733 932136 (0.4)709 (2.1)3798 (11.2)29 289 (86.3)
 38130 721372 (0.3)1996 (1.5)12 862 (9.8)115 491 (88.3)
 39279 225528 (0.2)3424 (1.2)25 449 (9.1)249 824 (89.5)
 40410  458766 (0.2)4669 (1.1)38 540 (9.4)366 483 (89.3)
 41387 388747 (0.2)5072 (1.3)38 661 (10.0)342 908 (88.5)
 ≥42309 712786 (0.3)5043 (1.6)34 564 (11.2)269 319 (87.0)
Year of delivery:
 1999-2004447 250794 (0.2)6554 (1.5)51 738 (11.6)388 164 (86.8)
 2005-08347 334617 (0.2)4702 (1.4)34 959 (10.1)307 056 (88.4)
 2009-12373 705814 (0.2)4640 (1.2)33 154 (8.9)335 097 (89.7)
 2013-16383 1471110 (0.3)5017 (1.3)34 023 (8.9)342 997 (89.5)
Maternal and birth characteristics according to Apgar score at 5 minutes: term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999 to 2016. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Neonatal mortality and morbidity

Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes were strongly associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity, compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes (fig 1, supplementary table B). Compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 10 minutes, adjusted odds ratios for neonatal mortality increased from 4.8 for an Apgar score of 9 at 10 minutes to 29.8 for an Apgar score of 7 at 10 minutes (fig 1; supplementary table B). Furthermore, adjusted odds ratios between lower Apgar score values and neonatal mortality and each neonatal morbidity were higher with increasing time after birth. For example, compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 1 minute, an Apgar score of 9 at 1 minute was associated with 1.5-fold higher adjusted odds of neonatal infections, whereas the association was larger at 5 and 10 minutes (adjusted odds ratios 2.1 and 3.3, respectively). Asphyxia related complications, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and respiratory distress were also strongly associated with Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9, and adjusted odds ratios increased with time since birth. The adjusted rate difference for respiratory distress was 9.5% (95% confidence interval 9.2% to 9.9%) for an Apgar score of 9 at 10 minutes and increased to 41.9% (37.7% to 46.4%) for an Apgar score of 7 at 10 minutes, compared with an Apgar score of 10 at 10 minutes (table 2). Lastly, the association between Apgar score and neonatal morbidity remained strong regardless of mode of delivery, and the highest odds ratios were observed for infants born following a non-instrumental vaginal delivery (supplementary table C).
Fig 1

Associations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes and neonatal mortality and morbidity among term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999˗2016

Table 2

Adjusted rate differences (per 100 births) for neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes for Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes compared with a score of 10, in Sweden, 1999 to 2016

Variables1 min Apgar score5 min Apgar score10 min Apgar score
No (%)Adjusted RD (95% CI)*No (%)Adjusted rate difference (95% CI)*No (%)Adjusted rate difference (95% CI)*
Neonatal mortality
Apgar scores:
 716 (0.03)0.02 (0.004 to 0.1)4 (0.1)0.04 (0.003 to 0.2)5 (0.6)0.6 (0.2 to 1.9)
 842 (0.03)0.02 (0.005 to 0.04)22 (0.1)0.1 (0.03 to 0.1)11 (0.2)0.3 (0.1 to 0.5)
 9207 (0.02)0.004 (−0.002 to 0.01)67 (0.04)0.02 (0.02 to 0.04)35 (0.1)0.1 (0.04 to 0.1)
 1017 (0.01)Reference189 (0.01)Reference231 (0.02)Reference
Neonatal infections
Apgar scores:
 71252 (2.4)1.5 (1.3 to 1.7)210 (6.3)5.5 (4.7 to 6.5)71 (8.7)8.3 (6.2 to 11)
 82051 (1.7)0.8 (0.7 to 1)856 (4.1)2.9 (2.7 to 3.2)375 (7.4)6.3 (5.5 to 7.1)
 99834 (0.8)0.3 (0.2 to 0.3)2595 (1.7)0.8 (0.8 to 0.9)1288 (2.9)1.9 (1.8 to 2.1)
 10823 (0.5)Reference10 299 (0.7)Reference12 226 (0.8)Reference
Asphyxia related complications
Apgar scores:
 7178 (0.3)0.2 (0.2 to 0.3)25 (0.7)0.6 (0.4 to 1.0)6 (0.7)0.7 (0.3 to 1.7)
 8218 (0.2)0.1 (0.1 to 0.1)105 (0.5)0.4 (0.3 to 0.5)54 (1.1)0.8 (0.6 to 1.2)
 9834 (0.1)0.02 (0.01 to 0.03)259 (0.2)0.1 (0.1 to 0.1)116 (0.3)0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)
 1069 (0.04)Reference910 (0.1)Reference1123 (0.1)Reference
Neonatal hypoglycaemia
Apgar scores:
 71799 (3.5)2.4 (2.2 to 2.8)228 (6.8)5.4 (4.4 to 6.4)74 (9.1)7.4 (5.3 to 10.2)
 83539 (2.9)1.9 (1.7 to 2.1)1038 (5.0)3.1 (2.8 to 3.4)354 (7.0)5.1 (4.4 to 6.0)
 918 815 (1.6)0.7 (0.6 to 0.8)4496 (2.9)1.5 (1.3 to 1.6)1765 (4.0)2.3 (2.1 to 2.6)
 101460 (0.9)Reference19 851 (1.4)Reference23 420 (1.6)Reference
Respiratory distress
Apgar scores:
 73736 (7.3)6.0 (5.6 to 6.6)1127 (33.8)27.9 (26.1 to 29.9)431 (52.8)41.9 (37.7 to 46.4)
 84920 (4.0)3.1 (2.9 to 3.4)3628 (16.3)14.6 (14 to 15.2)1952 (38.5)31.9 (30.2 to 33.5)
 912 732 (1.0)0.5 (0.4 to 0.6)6446 (4.2)3.2 (3 to 3.3)5101 (11.6)9.5 (9.2 to 9.9)
 10896 (0.5)Reference11 083 (0.8)Reference14 800 (1.0)Reference

Adjusted for maternal factors (age at childbirth, parity, country of birth, education, smoking, cohabitation with a partner, height, early pregnancy BMI) and birth characteristics of the infant (sex, gestational age in weeks, year of birth).

Associations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes and neonatal mortality and morbidity among term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999˗2016 Adjusted rate differences (per 100 births) for neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes for Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes compared with a score of 10, in Sweden, 1999 to 2016 Adjusted for maternal factors (age at childbirth, parity, country of birth, education, smoking, cohabitation with a partner, height, early pregnancy BMI) and birth characteristics of the infant (sex, gestational age in weeks, year of birth).

Combinations

Table 3 shows adjusted odds ratios for neonatal mortality and morbidity in relation to changes in Apgar score values from 5 to 10 minutes. A reduction of Apgar score from 10 at 5 minutes to 9 at 10 minutes was associated with higher adjusted odds ratios for neonatal infections, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and respiratory distress (compared with an Apgar score of 10 at both 5 and 10 minutes). For instance, compared with Apgar scores of 10 at both time points, a reduction in Apgar score from 10 at 5 minutes to 9 at 10 minutes was associated with a 4.1-fold higher odds of neonatal infections. Compared with Apgar scores of 10 at both time points, infants whose Apgar scores increased from 9 at 5 minutes to 10 at 10 minutes also had higher relative odds for all outcomes including neonatal mortality. For example, compared with Apgar scores of 10 at both time points, an improvement from an Apgar score of 9 at 5 minutes to 10 at 10 minutes was associated with a 1.8-fold higher odds of neonatal infections (adjusted odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 1.9).
Table 3

Combinations of Apgar scores at 5 and 10 minutes and adjusted odds ratios for neonatal mortality and morbidity among term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999˗2016

MorbidityApgar scoreNo (%)Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)*
5 min10 min
Neonatal mortality1010188 (0.01)Reference
1091 (0.1)-
91039 (0.03)2.8 (2.0 to 4.0)
9927 (0.1)5.5 (3.5 to 8.7)
9<91 (0.2)-
Neonatal infections101010 266 (0.7)Reference
10927 (3.7)4.1 (2.7 to 6.4)
9101716 (1.4)1.8 (1.7 to 1.9)
99848 (2.5)3.0 (2.8 to 3.3)
9<931 (6.0)6.9 (4.6 to 10.4)
Asphyxia related complications1010907 (0.1)Reference
1092 (0.3)-
910194 (0.2)2.4 (2.0 to 2.8)
9963 (0.2)2.6 (2.0 to 3.5)
9<92 (0.4)-
Neonatal hypoglycaemia101019 814 (1.4)Reference
10931 (4.3)2.5 (1.7 to 3.7)
9103225 (2.7)1.8 (1.7 to 1.8)
991239 (3.6)2.3 (2.2 to 2.4)
9<932 (6.2)3.8 (2.6 to 5.6)
Respiratory distress101010 883 (0.8)Reference
109156 (21.6)29.0 (23.9 to 35.3)
9103138 (2.6)3.3 (3.2 to 3.4)
993088 (9.0)11.7 (11.1 to 12.2)
9<9220 (42.6)77.1 (63.8 to 93.3)

Adjusted for maternal factors (age at childbirth, parity, country of birth, education, smoking, cohabitation with a partner, height and early pregnancy BMI) and birth characteristics of the infant (sex, gestational age in weeks, and year of birth).

Combinations of Apgar scores at 5 and 10 minutes and adjusted odds ratios for neonatal mortality and morbidity among term singleton live births in Sweden, 1999˗2016 Adjusted for maternal factors (age at childbirth, parity, country of birth, education, smoking, cohabitation with a partner, height and early pregnancy BMI) and birth characteristics of the infant (sex, gestational age in weeks, and year of birth). Pregnancy and delivery factors, including gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, induced onset of labour, vaginal instrumental or caesarean delivery, and meconium aspiration were associated with Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 (versus 10) at 5 and 10 minutes (see supplementary table D). The strength of association differed markedly, and the highest relative odds were obtained for pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, vaginal instrumental delivery, emergency caesarean delivery, and meconium aspiration. Premature rupture of the membranes was not associated with increased odds for Apgar scores of 7, 8, or 9 at 5 or 10 minutes. Pregnancy and delivery factors were not or were only modestly associated with Apgar scores of 7, 8, or 9 versus 10 at 1 minute, except for vaginal instrumental delivery and meconium aspiration, which were associated with markedly higher odds of an Apgar score of 7, 8, or 9 at 1 minute (eg, the adjusted odds ratio for an Apgar score of 9 versus 10 at 1 minute for meconium aspiration was 3.7 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 7.2)).

Discussion

In this nationwide Swedish cohort study, we found that a lower Apgar score within the normal range at 1, 5, and 10 minutes is strongly associated with increased risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, we found progressively higher relative odds of neonatal mortality, infections, asphyxia related complications, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and respiratory distress with lower Apgar scores (7 to 9) at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. The relative odds of neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with lower Apgar scores (in the normal range) increased with increasing time from birth. A small change in Apgar score from 5 minutes to 10 minutes (eg, from 10 to 9) was also associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity. Pregnancy and delivery related factors, such as pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, induced onset of labour, vaginal instrumental delivery, and meconium aspiration were associated with Apgar scores of 7 to 9 (versus 10), suggesting that low Apgar scores in the normal range represent early prognostic indicators highlighting the effects of pregnancy and delivery complications on neonatal morbidity.

Strengths and weaknesses of this study

Our study included more than 1.5 million births. We included all eligible births in Sweden over an 18 year period, thereby avoiding selection bias. Furthermore, we were able to adjust for several important confounders in multivariable analyses. In Sweden, all citizens have free access to uniform publicly funded healthcare, which contributes to high internal validity. However, the Apgar score is not subject to quality control measures and is prone to interobserver variability,26 and there are known international differences in the frequency of scores within the normal range.27 Nevertheless, the Apgar score has been shown to have good internal validity and could provide useful information about national trends in newborn health.5 Lastly, we lacked information about neonatal interventions and umbilical cord blood gases analysis, which could influence Apgar scores and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Future studies should examine the relation between acidosis and Apgar score within the normal ranges and its impact on neonatal morbidity.

Comparison with other studies

Previous studies have shown that an Apgar score of less than 7 is associated with neonatal morbidity, including meconium aspiration, neonatal respiratory distress, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, and infant mortality.6 9 10 25 The relation between Apgar score of less than 7 and neonatal and infant mortality is mainly attributed to anoxia or infections.6 Our study expands on these findings by showing that even “normal” Apgar scores (7 to 9) are strongly associated with higher risks of neonatal mortality and neonatal morbidity, and neonatal morbidity is associated with risks of long term neurological disorders.28 These findings are consistent with evidence suggesting that some infants with reassuring Apgar scores (7 to 9) with acidaemia have higher rates of adverse outcomes.29 Furthermore, risks associated with a low Apgar score (in the normal range) at 10 minutes were generally higher than those associated with the same score at 1 or 5 minutes. The strong relations between Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 and neonatal morbidity, and the associations between pregnancy complications and lower Apgar scores in the normal range observed in our study, provide insight into previous findings of increased risks of cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and adverse developmental outcomes in children with Apgar scores of 7, 8, and even 9, compared with an Apgar score of 10.2 3 30 In our study only 11% of infants had an Apgar score of 10 at 1 minute, which is typically attributable to a reduction in score for skin colour. This finding warrants attention as our results show that an Apgar score of 9 at 1 minute was associated with higher risk of neonatal morbidity. Although a reduction in the 5 minute Apgar score due to colour is independently associated with an increased risk of infant mortality,8 current guidelines consider Apgar scores of 7 or more at 1 and 5 minutes to be reassuring.31 Our findings of an incremental increase in the risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity among infants with Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, along with previous results of a linear relation2 3 4 30 between decreasing Apgar scores and increasing risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, suggest that efforts should be made to reduce the rate of low Apgar scores within the normal range and to strive for an Apgar score of 10 immediately after birth. Seizures, intracranial haemorrhage, and birth asphyxia have been shown to be associated with Apgar scores of less than 7 at 5 and 10 minutes.9 Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to show an association between a reduction in Apgar score (from 10 at 5 minutes to ≤9 at 10 minutes) and increased risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity, including infections, asphyxia related conditions, and respiratory distress. A low Apgar score at 5 minutes and 10 minutes might indicate the lack of an optimal response to resuscitation and could imply an adverse long term prognosis.9 A reduction in Apgar score from 5 minutes to 10 minutes is also associated with higher risks of later developing cerebral palsy, epilepsy, or other developmental adversity.3 4 Although Apgar scores at 10 minutes are often not recorded in the medical charts if scores are within the normal range (7 to 10) at 5 minutes, our findings suggest that all newborns should be assigned an Apgar score at 10 minutes, regardless of their score at 1 minute and 5 minutes. This will enable at-risk neonates to be identified and monitored to minimise the risk of adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study shows that low Apgar scores within the normal range (7 to 10) are strongly associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity and that these associations are substantially stronger with increasing time after birth. Additionally, a decrease in Apgar score from 10 at 5 minutes to 9 or less at 10 minutes is associated with a higher risk of neonatal morbidity. Our findings provide strong evidence to support the proposition that the optimal Apgar score is 10 at each time point, and all newborns should be assigned an Apgar score at 10 minutes, regardless of their score at 1 minute and 5 minutes. An Apgar score of less than 7 has implications for neonatal mortality, morbidity, and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes No previous study has investigated whether Apgar scores of 7, 8, and 9 (compared with 10) are associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity In term, non-malformed infants, the risks of neonatal mortality and morbidity were higher among those with lower Apgar score values within the normal range (7 to 9) at 1, 5, and 10 minutes Even a small change in Apgar score from 5 minutes to 10 minutes was associated with higher risks of neonatal morbidity The optimal Apgar score is 10 at each time point, and all newborns should be assigned an Apgar score at 10 minutes, regardless of their score at 1 minute and 5 minutes
  23 in total

1.  The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants.

Authors:  B M Casey; D D McIntire; K J Leveno
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant.

Authors:  V APGAR
Journal:  Curr Res Anesth Analg       Date:  1953 Jul-Aug

3.  Correct use of the Apgar score for resuscitated and intubated newborn babies: questionnaire study.

Authors:  Enrico Lopriore; G Frederiek van Burk; Frans J Walther; Arnout Jan de Beaufort
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-18

4.  Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births.

Authors:  K Thorngren-Jerneck; A Herbst
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Joint association of Apgar scores and early neonatal symptoms with minor disabilities at school age.

Authors:  D Moster; R T Lie; T Markestad
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Events at early development: are they associated with early word production and neurodevelopmental abilities at the preschool age?

Authors:  Peter B Marschik; Christa Einspieler; Bettina Garzarolli; Heinz F R Prechtl
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The Apgar score.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.968

8.  Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score.

Authors:  Colm P F O'Donnell; C Omar F Kamlin; Peter G Davis; John B Carlin; Colin J Morley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Long-term outcome in term breech infants with low Apgar score--a population-based follow-up.

Authors:  L Krebs; J Langhoff-Roos; K Thorngren-Jerneck
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  A cohort study of low Apgar scores and cognitive outcomes.

Authors:  D E Odd; F Rasmussen; D Gunnell; G Lewis; A Whitelaw
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.747

View more
  8 in total

1.  Associations between low Apgar scores and mortality by race in the United States: A cohort study of 6,809,653 infants.

Authors:  Emma Gillette; James P Boardman; Clara Calvert; Jeeva John; Sarah J Stock
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 11.613

2.  From Soranus score to Apgar score.

Authors:  Neda Razaz
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 3.  Validity of Apgar Score as an Indicator of Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Melissa Chao; Carlo Menon; Mohamed Elgendi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  Five-Minute Apgar Score and the Risk of Mental Disorders During the First Four Decades of Life: A Nationwide Registry-Based Cohort Study in Denmark.

Authors:  Hua He; Yongfu Yu; Hui Wang; Carsten Lyng Obel; Fei Li; Jiong Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Prediction of low Apgar score at five minutes following labor induction intervention in vaginal deliveries: machine learning approach for imbalanced data at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania.

Authors:  Clifford Silver Tarimo; Soumitra S Bhuyan; Yizhen Zhao; Weicun Ren; Akram Mohammed; Quanman Li; Marilyn Gardner; Michael Johnson Mahande; Yuhui Wang; Jian Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Risk Factors for Recurrence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Correlation with Maternal and Infant Prognosis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Wei; Ruihong Hu; Ying Gao; Zhongqin Yu; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Factors associated with 5-min APGAR score, death and survival in neonatal intensive care: a case-control study.

Authors:  Victória Brioso Tavares; Josiel de Souza E Souza; Márcio Vinicius de Gouveia Affonso; Emerson Souza Da Rocha; Lucio Flavio Garcia Rodrigues; Luciana de Fátima da Costa Moraes; Gabrielly Cristiny Dos Santos Coelho; Sabrina Souza Araújo; Pablo Fabiano Moura das Neves; Fabiana de Campos Gomes; João Simão de Melo-Neto
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.567

8.  The Association between the Five-Minute Apgar Score and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes among Children Aged 8-66 Months in Australia.

Authors:  Tahir Ahmed Hassen; Catherine Chojenta; Nicholas Egan; Deborah Loxton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.