| Literature DB >> 27255376 |
Gustavo Capatti Cassiano1,2, Adriana A C Furini3, Marcela P Capobianco4,3, Luciane M Storti-Melo5, Maria E Almeida6, Danielle R L Barbosa7, Marinete M Póvoa7, Paulo A Nogueira6, Ricardo L D Machado4,3,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Humoral immune responses against proteins of asexual blood-stage malaria parasites have been associated with clinical immunity. However, variations in the antibody-driven responses may be associated with a genetic component of the human host. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of co-stimulatory molecule gene polymorphisms of the immune system on the magnitude of the humoral immune response against a Plasmodium vivax vaccine candidate antigen.Entities:
Keywords: Antibodies; ICB2-5; Immunogenetics; MSP-1; Plasmodium vivax
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27255376 PMCID: PMC4891883 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1350-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Levels of Plasmodium vivax ICB2-5-specific IgM, IgG and IgG subclasses with respect to the analysed genotypes from individuals infected with P. vivax
| SNP | Gene | Genotypes | Genotypes (na) | Genotypes (nb) | IgG (RI) | IgG1 (RI) | IgG2 (RI) | IgG3 (RI) | IgG4 (RI) | IgM (RI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs35593994 |
| GG/GA/AA | 86/80/12 | 42/39/8 | 1.02/1.03/1.11 | 1.11/1.10/0.89 | 0.92/0.93/0.80 | 0.76/0.86/0.64 | 0.77/0.83/0.74 | 0.66/0.86/1.13c |
| rs3116496 |
| TT/TC/CC | 118/54/6 | 60/27/2 | 1.04/1.02/0.91 | 1.06/0.98/3.13d | 0.91/0.92/0.95 | 0.82/0.72/0.75 | 0.82/0.75/0.67 | 0.83/0.70/0.65 |
| rs733618 |
| TT/TC/CC | 135/20/2 | 72/7/1 | 1.06/0.89/1.05 | 1.11/0.97/0.81 | 0.87/1.18/0.64e | 0.80/0.66/0.57 | 0.80/0.68/0.62 | 0.82/0.72/1.25 |
| rs11571316 |
| GG/GA/AA | 59/75/12 | 29/39/4 | 1.04/1.03/0.97 | 1.17/1.10/0.84 | 0.96/0.95/0.68 | 0.74/0.86/0.56 | 0.73/0.82/0.66 | 0.81/0.75/0.79 |
| rs5742909 |
| CC/CT/TT | 151/27/0 | 75/14/0 | 1.15/1.01/– | 1.04/1.29/– | 0.91/0.93/– | 0.80/0.76/– | 0.80/0.78/– | 0.79/0.78/– |
| rs231775 |
| AA/AG/GG | 75/84/19 | 40/41/8 | 1.07/1.00/1.01 | 0.96/1.22/0.98 | 0.87/0.98/0.82 | 0.78/0.82/0.70 | 0.79/0.79/0.81 | 0.79/0.75/0.89 |
| rs4675378 |
| TT/TC/CC | 77/73/27 | 35/38/16 | 1.00/1.05/1.09 | 1.08/1.12/0.99 | 0.86/0.94/0.96 | 0.73/0.90/0.67 | 0.80/0.78/0.80 | 0.80/0.73/0.85 |
| rs1129055 |
| GG/GA/AA | 110/60/8 | 53/31/5 | 1.00/1.08/1.15 | 1.08/1.09/1.06 | 0.93/0.90/0.93 | 0.78/0.82/0.70 | 0.82/0.76/0.70 | 0.81/0.73/0.90 |
| rs1883832 |
| CC/CT/TT | 135/37/6 | 65/20/4 | 1.01/1.06/1.25 | 1.11/1.03/0.86 | 0.92/0.95/0.68 | 0.81/0.77/0.65 | 0.81/0.75/0.79 | 0.80/0.69/1.13 |
| rs9514828 |
| CC/CT/TT | 103/62/13 | 48/35/6 | 0.99/1.07/1.15 | 0.99/1.23/0.98 | 0.91/0.94/0.83 | 0.82/0.69/1.11 | 0.76/0.81/0.92 | 0.73/0.83/0.95 |
aNumber of individuals evaluated for ICB2-5-specific IgM and total IgG (n = 178)
bNumber of individuals evaluated for ICB2-5-specific IgG subclasses (n = 90)
cSignificant according to the dominant model (p = 0.033)
dSignificant according to the recessive model (p = 0.00004)
eSignificant according to the overdominant model (p = 0.042)
Fig. 1Linkage disequilibrium of investigated polymorphisms in region 2q33, which comprises genes CD28, CTLA4 and ICOS. The numbers within the squares represent the D’ value, expressed as per cent. Empty squares represent a D’ value of 1, which indicates complete linkage disequilibrium. Darker-shaded squares represent pairs with an LOD score = 2, light grey squares represent D’ = 1 and LOD < 2, and white squares represent LOD < 2 and D’ < 1. Two blocks were identified by means of the solid spine of linkage disequilibrium method [37]. Linkage Disequilibrium map was generated by Haploview 4.2
Haplotype frequencies and their association with levels of ICB2-5-specific antibodies
| Block | Haplotype | Frequency | IgG | IgG1 | IgG2 | IgG3 | IgG4 | IgM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆% |
| ∆% |
| ∆% |
| ∆% |
| ∆% |
| ∆% |
| |||
| Block 1 | G-T | 0.522 | Reference | |||||||||||
| A-T | 0.292 | 2 (−9; 13) | 0.72 | −3 (−27; 21) | 0.80 | −3 (−16; 9) | 0.61 | 0 (−15; 14) | 0.95 | 0 (−10; 10) | 0.99 | 20 (2; 38) |
| |
| G-C | 0.185 | −3 (−16; 9) | 0.59 | 21 (−9; 51) | 0.17 | 0 (−15; 16) | 0.96 | −8 (−27; 10) | 0.38 | −7 (−19; 5) | 0.26 | −6 (−27; 15) | 0.58 | |
| Block 2 | T-G-C | 0.518 | Reference | |||||||||||
| T-A-C | 0.330 | −2 (−14; 10) | 0.72 | −4 (−32; 25) | 0.81 | −9 (−23; 5) | 0.21 | 2 (−16; 19) | 0.85 | 3 (−9; 16) | 0.59 | −7 (−28; 13) | 0.48 | |
| T-G-T | 0.076 | 12 (−7; 31) | 0.22 | 49 (−23; 121) | 0.18 | 3 (−21; 27) | 0.83 | −4 (−34; 25) | 0.77 | −3 (−23; 17) | 0.77 | −3 (−34; 27) | 0.84 | |
| C-G-C | 0.063 | −17 (−38; 11) | 0.27 | −10 (−70; 51) | 0.75 | −14 (−44; 17) | 0.38 | −14 (−52; 23) | 0.45 | −11 (−36; 14) | 0.38 | −23 (−54; 9) | 0.16 | |
The effects of each haplotype are relative to the most frequent haplotype, which was used as a reference. ∆% indicates changes relative to the antibody levels compared to reference haplotypes, with 95 % confidence intervals. Block 1 refers to the SNPs rs35593994 and rs3116496, and block 2 refers to rs733618, rs11571316 and rs5742909
Fig. 2Interaction between SNPs in the codominant model. The diagonal contains the p values of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) for the effect of each SNP individually. The upper triangle in the matrix contains the p values for the interaction log-LRT. The lower triangle contains the p values from LRT comparing the two-SNP additive likelihood to the best finding of the single-SNP model [35]
Significant interactions between the SNPs rs35593994 and rs9514828 and the levels of IgM specific for ICB2-5
|
|
| IgM (RIa) | ∆b | 95 % CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | CC | 0.503 | Reference | ||
| GG | CT | 1.025 | 0.523 | (0.195–0.850) | 0.002 |
| GA | CC | 0.916 | 0.413 | (0.126–0.702) | 0.005 |
| GA | TT | 1.441 | 0.939 | (0.395–1.483) | 0.0009 |
aAntibody levels are expressed as the mean of the reactivity index (RI)
bDifference of the RI mean
cBased on a logistic regression model using individuals exhibiting wild type genotypes (GG and CC) as a reference