Literature DB >> 27255228

[Grading of tumors in the tubular digestive tract : Esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum].

H Bläker1.   

Abstract

Grading of tumors located in the tubular digestive tract is an integral component of pathology assessment reports but is subordinate to the histological typing of tumors with respect to the prognostic significance. Tumor grading has not been shown to be an independent prognostic marker for most tumor entities in the gastrointestinal tract; however, it may be relevant for further routine treatment decision making in early Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage cancers in which the prognosis for patients is less dominated by advanced tumor spread. Owing to the more favorable prognosis of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that poorly differentiated tumors should be tested and graded as low grade (G1/G2) when microsatellite instability is detected. This recommendation has been integrated into the German S3 guidelines for colorectal cancers. Accordingly, microsatellite instability testing for grading purposes should become routine practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision aid; Microsatellite instability; Prognosis; Therapy; Tumor typing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255228     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0165-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  31 in total

1.  Validation of a modified GTNM classification in peri-junctional oesophago-gastric carcinoma and its use as a prognostic indicator.

Authors:  G H Dickson; K K Singh; X Escofet; K Kelley
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

3.  Gastric carcinoma. A pathobiological classification.

Authors:  S C Ming
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Should the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma include microsatellite instability status?

Authors:  Christophe Rosty; Elizabeth J Williamson; Mark Clendenning; Rhiannon J Walters; Aung K Win; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; Ingrid M Winship; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Dallas R English; Daniel D Buchanan
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Tumour 'budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Ueno; J Murphy; J R Jass; H Mochizuki; I C Talbot
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Prognostic comparison of the pathological classifications of gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  P Roy; F Piard; L Dusserre-Guion; L Martin; D Michiels-Marzais; J Faivre
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Kamakura; M Mori; H Baba; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Is microsatellite instability a prognostic marker in gastric cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Young Choi; Jung Min Bae; Ji Yeong An; In Gyu Kwon; In Cho; Hyun Beak Shin; Tanaka Eiji; Mohammad Aburahmah; Hyung-Il Kim; Jae-Ho Cheong; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  The histologic grading of cancer.

Authors:  M T Carriaga; D E Henson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Influence of pathological tumour variables on long-term survival in resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; I C Talbot; S Weeden
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Label-Free Electrochemical Immunosensor for Detection of the Tumor Marker CA242 Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide-Gold-Palladium Nanocomposite.

Authors:  Xin Du; Xiaodi Zheng; Zhenhua Zhang; Xiaofan Wu; Lei Sun; Jun Zhou; Min Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.