Literature DB >> 25149551

Should the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma include microsatellite instability status?

Christophe Rosty1, Elizabeth J Williamson2, Mark Clendenning3, Rhiannon J Walters4, Aung K Win2, Mark A Jenkins2, John L Hopper5, Ingrid M Winship6, Melissa C Southey3, Graham G Giles7, Dallas R English7, Daniel D Buchanan8.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum are graded using a 2-tiered system into histologic low-grade and high-grade tumors based on the proportion of gland formation. The current grading system does not apply to subtypes of carcinomas associated with a high frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI), such as mucinous and medullary carcinomas. We investigated the combined effect of histologic grade and MSI status on survival for 738 patients with colorectal carcinoma (48% female; mean age at diagnosis 68.2 years). The proportion of high-grade adenocarcinoma was 18%. MSI was observed in 59 adenocarcinomas (9%), with higher frequency in high-grade tumors compared with low-grade tumors (20% versus 6%; P < .001). Using Cox regression models, adjusting for sex and age at diagnosis and stratifying by the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, microsatellite stable (MSS) high-grade tumors were associated with increased hazard of all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality: hazard ratio 2.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.77) and 2.54 (95% CI, 1.86-3.47), respectively, both P < .001. A new grading system separating adenocarcinoma into low grade (all histologic low grade and MSI high grade) and high grade (MSS histologic high grade) gave a lower Akaike information criterion value when compared with the current grading system and thus represented a better model fit to stratify patients according to survival. We found that patients with a high-grade adenocarcinoma had significantly shorter survival than patients with low-grade adenocarcinoma only if the tumor was MSS, suggesting that the grading of colorectal adenocarcinoma with high-grade histologic features should be made according to the MSI status of the tumor.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Grade; Microsatellite instability; Prognosis; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25149551     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  10 in total

Review 1.  Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James W T Toh; Kevin Phan; Faizur Reza; Pierre Chapuis; Kevin J Spring
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Diagnosing colorectal medullary carcinoma: interobserver variability and clinicopathological implications.

Authors:  Lik Hang Lee; Rhonda K Yantiss; Eran Sadot; Bing Ren; Marcela Santos Calvacanti; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Sinisa Ivelja; Be Huynh; Yue Xue; Tatiana Shitilbans; Hamza Guend; Zsofia K Stadler; Martin R Weiser; Efsevia Vakiani; Mithat Gönen; David S Klimstra; Jinru Shia
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer.

Authors:  Kjersti Elvestad Hestetun; Kristine Aasebø; Nina Benedikte Rosenlund; Yvonne Müller; Olav Dahl; Mette Pernille Myklebust
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  [Grading of tumors in the tubular digestive tract : Esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum].

Authors:  H Bläker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Mismatch repair deficiency as a prognostic factor in mucinous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Juliana Andrici; Mahtab Farzin; Loretta Sioson; Adele Clarkson; Nicole Watson; Christopher W Toon; Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  A novel histologic grading scheme based on poorly differentiated clusters is applicable to treated rectal cancer and is associated with established histopathological prognosticators.

Authors:  Michelle Yang; Aseeb Ur Rehman; Chunlai Zuo; Christine E Sheehan; Edward C Lee; Jingmei Lin; Zijin Zhao; Euna Choi; Hwajeong Lee
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Label-free, automated classification of microsatellite status in colorectal cancer by infrared imaging.

Authors:  Angela Kallenbach-Thieltges; Frederik Großerueschkamp; Hendrik Jütte; Claus Kuepper; Anke Reinacher-Schick; Andrea Tannapfel; Klaus Gerwert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Overexpression of sortilin is associated with 5-FU resistance and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sabrina Blondy; Hugo Talbot; Sofiane Saada; Niki Christou; Serge Battu; Julie Pannequin; Marie-Odile Jauberteau; Fabrice Lalloué; Mireille Verdier; Muriel Mathonnet; Aurélie Perraud
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  The Molecular Associations of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma in Colorectum: Meta-Analysis and System Review.

Authors:  Xueting Liu; Litao Huang; Menghan Liu; Zhu Wang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.948

10.  Prognostic Impact of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Presenting With Mucinous, Signet-Ring, and Poorly Differentiated Cells.

Authors:  Sang Hun Jung; So Hyun Kim; Jae Hwang Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-04-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.