Literature DB >> 27254293

A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas.

Elijah R Cetas1, Maï Yasué1.   

Abstract

In conservation projects in and around protected areas (PAs), a suite of policy instruments are used to promote conservation behavior in local people. Few studies have related psychological research on motivational values to conservation in PAs. We conducted a systematic review of 120 peer-reviewed articles to assess the relative frequencies of policy instruments that aimed to foster intrinsic versus extrinsic motivations to conserve. We examined how the type of motivation engendered by the instrument (i.e., intrinsic or extrinsic motivation and based on the description of how the project was designed and implemented) influenced the ecological, economic, and social success of the project. We assessed the success of the project in only the case studies that included a quantitative or qualitative analysis of success. Projects designed to foster at least one intrinsically motivating instrument were 3 times more likely to meet socioeconomic or ecological goals. Although certain types of instruments such as payments or fines tended to be based on extrinsic motivators more often than education or monitoring programs, several successful projects involving payments or fines were linked to intrinsic motivation in the local community. Thus, our results suggest that rather than debating the relative merits of specific types of policy instruments, conservationists may have more success by focusing on how different motivators, suited to specific contexts, can better empower local communities to conserve. Broadly, our results suggest the current emphasis on social justice and well-being of local communities is a positive step toward protecting the world's remaining biodiversity.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICDP; community-based conservation; conservación basada en la comunidad; meta-analysis; meta-análisis; psicología; psychology; self-determination theory; teoría de la auto-determinación

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27254293     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.

Authors:  Scott T Yabiku; Abigail Sullivan; Abigail M York; Qunshan Zhao; Jennifer E Glick; Sharon J Hall; Dirgha J Ghimire; Li An
Journal:  Environ Conserv       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species.

Authors:  Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire; Jeremy Pittman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.943

3.  Single species conservation as an umbrella for management of landscape threats.

Authors:  Claire A Runge; John C Withey; David E Naugle; Joseph E Fargione; Kate J Helmstedt; Ashley E Larsen; Sebastian Martinuzzi; Jason D Tack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Working from the Inside Out: Fostering Intrinsic Motivation and Expanding Our Criteria for Conservation Success.

Authors:  Claire Cardinal; Miranda A Strubel; Aimee S Oxley
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework.

Authors:  Nathan J Bennett; Tara S Whitty; Elena Finkbeiner; Jeremy Pittman; Hannah Bassett; Stefan Gelcich; Edward H Allison
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.