| Literature DB >> 27253706 |
Oriana Simonetti1, Oscar Cirioni2, Ivana Cacciatore3, Leonardo Baldassarre3, Fiorenza Orlando4, Elisa Pierpaoli4, Guendalina Lucarini5, Elena Orsetti2, Mauro Provinciali4, Erika Fornasari3, Antonio Di Stefano3, Andrea Giacometti2, Annamaria Offidani1.
Abstract
In staphylococci, quorum sensing regulates both biofilm formation and toxin production, moreover it has been demonstrated to be inhibited by RNAIII inhibiting peptide (RIP). Aim our study was to evaluate the in vitro activity and its in vivo efficacy of the combined administration of FS10, a novel RIP derivative, and tigecycline in an animal model of methicillin-resistant (MR) and methicillin-sensitive (MS) Staphylococcus aureus wound infection. Using a 1.x2 cm template, one full thickness wound was established through the panniculus carnosus on the back subcutaneous tissue of each animal. Infection was determined by inoculation of 5x107 CFU/ml of bacteria, that produced an abscess within 24 h, after this, treatment was initiated. The study included, for each strain, a control group without infection, a control infected group that did not receive any treatment and a control infected group with drug-free foam dressing, and three infected groups treated, respectively, with: FS10-soaked foam dressing (containing 20 μg FS10), daily intraperitoneal tigecycline (7 mg/Kg), FS10-soaked foam dressing (containing 20 μg FS10) and daily intraperitoneal injections of tigecycline (7 mg/Kg). The main outcome measures were quantitative culture and histological examination of tissue repair. The highest inhibition of infection was achieved in the group that received FS10-soaked and parenteral tigecycline reducing the bacterial load from 107 CFU/ml to about 103 CFU/g for MSSA and to about 104 CFU/g for MRSA. The group treated with FS10-soaked foam dressing associated with parenteral tigecycline showed, histologically, better overall healing with epithelialization and collagen scores significantly higher than those of the other groups in both strains. In conclusion, the combined use of topical FS10 with i.p. tigecycline induced positive interaction in vivo, resulting in an enhanced therapeutic benefit versus staphylococcal infections in murine wound models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27253706 PMCID: PMC4890846 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Chemical structure of FS10.
A five-tiered grading system to evaluate maturity of wound repair.
| Score | Re-epithelialization | Granulation tissue | Collagen deposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trace and focal migrating | Trace | None | |
| Migrating | Hypocellular and none vessel | Trace | |
| Partial stratum corneum | Many cells and few vessels | Slight | |
| Hypertrophic and partial stratum corneum | Many fibroblasts, some fibers and some vessels | Moderate | |
| Complete and normal | More fibers, few cells | Marked |
Fig 2Quantitative cultures observed in MSSA infection.
The limit of detection for this method was approximately 10 CFU/g. ANOVA test p<0.05: C3 vs C1; p<0.05 T1, T3, T5 vs C1; p<0.005 T5 vs T3 and T1
Fig 3Quantitative cultures observed in MRSA infection.
The limit of detection for this method was approximately 10 CFU/g. ANOVA test p<0.05 C4 vs C2; p<0.005 T2, T4, T6 vs C2; p<0.005 T6 vs T4 and T2
Summary of the biological impact of different treatment on wound healing parameters at day 8 post-wounding in MRSA mice models.
| MICE MODEL | EPITHELIALIZATION Score (mean±S.D.) | GRANULATION TISSUE (mean±S.D.) | COLLAGEN ORGANIZATION (mean±S.D.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C0 | 3.30±035 | 3.28±0.65 | 3.10±0.58 |
| C2 | 0.4±0.15 | 0.35±0.15 | 0.30±0.20 |
| C4 | 0.65±0.30 | 0.75±0.28 | 0.50±0.28 |
| C5 | 3.40±0.45 | 3.10±0.78 | 3.20±0.50 |
| T2 | 2.80±0.30 | 2.80±0.50 | 3.0±0.20 |
| T4 | 3.00±0.45 | 2.90±0.20 | 3.0±0.10 |
| T6 | 3.50±0.20 | 3.25±0.40 | 3.20±0.15 |
(C0) Control group (non-infected mice); (C2) MRSA-infected mice without treatment; (C4) MRSA-infected mice with drug-free-Allevyn; (C5) Non infected mice with drug-free Allevyn; (T2) MRSA-infected mice treated with Allevyn and FS10; (T4) MRSA-infected mice treated with Allevyn and tigecicline; (T6) MRSA-infected mice treated with Allevyn tigecicline and FS10.
Bonferroni test p<0.05
C0, C5, T2,T4 vs C2,C4
C0,C5,T2,T4,T6 vs C2,C4
T6 vs C0,C2,C4,T2
Fig 4Histology of mouse wound healing at day 7 after injury.
A) Non infected mice; B) MRSA-infected mice without treatment; C)MRSA-infected mice with Allevyn; D)Non infected mice with Allevyn. (Hematoxylin and Eosin; original magnification x200).
Fig 5Histology of mouse wound healing at day 7 after injury.
A) MRSA-infected mice treated with Allevyn and FS10; B) MRSA-infected mice treated with i.p.tigecycline; C)MRSA-infected mice treated with tigecycline and FS10. (Hematoxylin and Eosin; original magnification x200).