Literature DB >> 27253619

A computational approach to mortality prediction of alcohol use disorder inpatients.

Jacob Calvert1, Qingqing Mao1, Angela J Rogers2, Christopher Barton3, Melissa Jay1, Thomas Desautels1, Hamid Mohamadlou1, Jasmine Jan4, Ritankar Das1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health information technologies can assist clinicians in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) by providing additional analysis of patient stability. However, because patient diagnoses can be confounded by chronic alcohol use, the predictive value of existing systems is suboptimal. Through the use of Electronic Health Records (EHR), we have developed computer software called AutoTriage to generate accurate predictions through multi-dimensional analysis of clinical variables. We analyze the performance of AutoTriage on the Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) subpopulation in this study, and build on results we reported for AutoTriage performance on the general population in previous work.
METHODS: AUD-related ICD-9 codes were used to obtain a patient population from MIMIC III ICU dataset for a retrospective study. Patient mortality risk score is generated through analysis of eight EHR-based clinical variables. The score is determined by combining weighted subscores, each of which are obtained from singlets, doublets or triplets of one or more of the eight continuous-valued clinical variable inputs. A temporally updating risk score is computed with a continuously revised 12-hour mortality prediction.
RESULTS: Among AUD patients, in a non-overlapping test set, AutoTriage outperforms existing systems with an Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) value of 0.934 for 12-h mortality prediction. At a sensitivity of 90%, AutoTriage achieves a specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 40%, negative predictive value of 89%, and an Odds Ratio of 36.
CONCLUSIONS: For mortality prediction, AutoTriage demonstrates improvements in both the accuracy and the Odds Ratio over current systems among the AUD patient population.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol use disorder; Clinical decision support systems; Electronic health records; Medical informatics; Mortality prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27253619     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  5 in total

1.  Mortality prediction model for the triage of COVID-19, pneumonia, and mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Logan Ryan; Carson Lam; Samson Mataraso; Angier Allen; Abigail Green-Saxena; Emily Pellegrini; Jana Hoffman; Christopher Barton; Andrea McCoy; Ritankar Das
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-03

2.  Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  David W Shimabukuro; Christopher W Barton; Mitchell D Feldman; Samson J Mataraso; Ritankar Das
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2017-11-09

3.  Using Transfer Learning for Improved Mortality Prediction in a Data-Scarce Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Thomas Desautels; Jacob Calvert; Jana Hoffman; Qingqing Mao; Melissa Jay; Grant Fletcher; Chris Barton; Uli Chettipally; Yaniv Kerem; Ritankar Das
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  Using electronic health record collected clinical variables to predict medical intensive care unit mortality.

Authors:  Jacob Calvert; Qingqing Mao; Jana L Hoffman; Melissa Jay; Thomas Desautels; Hamid Mohamadlou; Uli Chettipally; Ritankar Das
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.

Authors:  Qingqing Mao; Melissa Jay; Jana L Hoffman; Jacob Calvert; Christopher Barton; David Shimabukuro; Lisa Shieh; Uli Chettipally; Grant Fletcher; Yaniv Kerem; Yifan Zhou; Ritankar Das
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.