Literature DB >> 27252738

Differences in monthly variation, cause, and place of injury between femoral neck and trochanteric fractures: 6-year survey (2008-2013) in Kyoto prefecture, Japan.

Motoyuki Horii1, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara2, Yasuo Mikami3, Takumi Ikeda3, Keiichiro Ueshima2, Kazuya Ikoma2, Toshiharu Shirai2, Masateru Nagae2, Yoshinobu Oka2, Koshiro Sawada3, Nagato Kuriyama4, Toshikazu Kubo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures reportedly differ by age and regionality. We investigated differences in monthly variations of the occurrence of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures as well as place and cause of injury in the Kyoto prefecture over a 6-year period.
METHODS: Fracture type (neck or trochanteric fracture), age, sex, place of injury, and cause of injury were surveyed among patients aged ≥ 65 years with hip fractures that occurred between 2008 and 2013 who were treated in 1 of 13 participating hospitals (5 in an urban area and 8 in a rural area). The proportion of sick beds in the participating hospitals was 24.7% (4,151/16,781). Monthly variations in the number of patients were investigated in urban and rural areas in addition to the entire Kyoto prefecture. Place of injury was classified as indoors or outdoors, and cause of injury was categorized as simple fall, accident, or uncertain.
RESULTS: There were 2,826 patients with neck fractures (mean age, 82.1 years) and 3,305 patients with trochanteric fractures (mean age, 85.0 years). There were similarities in the monthly variation of the number of fractures in addition to the place and cause of injury between neck and trochanteric fractures. Indoors (approximately 74%) and simple falls (approximately 78%) were the primary place and cause of injury, respectively. The place of injury was not significantly different by fracture type with each age group. Significantly more patients with neck fracture had "uncertain" as the cause of injury than trochanteric fracture in all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the present study, the injury pattern might not have a great effect on the susceptibility difference between neck and trochanteric fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; femoral neck fracture; hip fracture; monthly variation; trochanteric fracture

Year:  2016        PMID: 27252738      PMCID: PMC4869947          DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.1.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab        ISSN: 1724-8914


  20 in total

1.  Epidemiology of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in 1994 in Tangshan, China.

Authors:  L Zhang; A Cheng; Z Bai; Y Lu; N Endo; Y Dohmae; H E Takahashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Cervical and trochanteric hip fractures: bone mass and other parameters.

Authors:  A Stewart; R W Porter; W R Primrose; L G Walker; D M Reid
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Okinawa, Japan.

Authors:  Harumi Arakaki; Ichiro Owan; Hirohisa Kudoh; Hidehiro Horizono; Kaoru Arakaki; Yasunari Ikema; Hirotaka Shinjo; Kaori Hayashi; Fuminori Kanaya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Incidence of hip fracture in Shiraz, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmood Soveid; Ali Reza Serati; Masoomeh Masoompoor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Elderly patients with trochanteric hip fracture have lower serum Vitamin D levels compared to patients with cervical hip fracture.

Authors:  Olga E Dretakis; Andrew N Margioris; Christos Tsatsanis; Konstantin E Dretakis; Niki Malliaraki; Konstantin Steriopoulos
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Incidence of hip fracture in southeastern Norway: a study of 1,730 cervical and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  K Bjørgul; O Reikerås
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types.

Authors:  O Löfman; K Berglund; L Larsson; G Toss
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The incidence of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in 1999 in Niigata Prefecture, Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Morita; Naoto Endo; Toshiroh Iga; Kunihiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Ohkawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Recent trends in the incidence and lifetime risk of hip fracture in Tottori, Japan.

Authors:  H Hagino; K Furukawa; S Fujiwara; T Okano; H Katagiri; K Yamamoto; R Teshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Urban versus rural differences in the occurrence of hip fractures in Japan's Kyoto prefecture during 2008-2010: a comparison of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Motoyuki Horii; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Takumi Ikeda; Keiichiro Ueshima; Kazuya Ikoma; Toshiharu Shirai; Ryu Terauchi; Masateru Nagae; Nagato Kuriyama; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.