Literature DB >> 27250170

Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.

Z Ellen Peng1, Lily M Wang1.   

Abstract

A large number of non-native English speakers may be found in American classrooms, both as listeners and talkers. Little is known about how this population comprehends speech in realistic adverse acoustical conditions. A study was conducted to investigate the effects of background noise level (BNL), reverberation time (RT), and talker foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' speech comprehension, while controlling for English language abilities. A total of 115 adult listeners completed comprehension tasks under 15 acoustic conditions: three BNLs (RC-30, RC-40, and RC-50) and five RTs (from 0.4 to 1.2 s). Fifty-six listeners were tested with speech from native English-speaking talkers and 59 with native Mandarin-Chinese-speaking talkers. Results show that, while higher BNLs were generally more detrimental to listeners with lower English proficiency, all listeners experienced significant comprehension deficits above RC-40 with native English talkers. This limit was lower (i.e., above RC-30), however, with Chinese talkers. For reverberation, non-native listeners as a group performed best with RT up to 0.6 s, while native listeners performed equally well up to 1.2 s. A matched foreign accent benefit has also been identified, where the negative impact of higher reverberation does not exist for non-native listeners who share the talker's native language.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27250170     DOI: 10.1121/1.4948564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Maya S Freund; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Florian Pausch; Janina Fels
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Nonnative implicit phonetic training in multiple reverberant environments.

Authors:  Eleni Vlahou; Aaron R Seitz; Norbert Kopčo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Brianna Bean; Steven C Marcrum; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 5.  Speak like a Native English Speaker or Be Judged: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kim Hua Tan; Michelle Elaine Anak William Jospa; Nur-Ehsan Mohd-Said; Mohd Mahzan Awang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  High variability phonetic training in adaptive adverse conditions is rapid, effective, and sustained.

Authors:  Christine Xiang Ru Leong; Jessica M Price; Nicola J Pitchford; Walter J B van Heuven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  fNIRS Assessment of Speech Comprehension in Children with Normal Hearing and Children with Hearing Aids in Virtual Acoustic Environments: Pilot Data and Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Laura Bell; Z Ellen Peng; Florian Pausch; Vanessa Reindl; Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube; Janina Fels; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.