| Literature DB >> 27249558 |
Yen-Li Lo1, Wen-Harn Pan1, Wan-Lun Hsu2, Yin-Chu Chien2, Jen-Yang Chen3,4, Mow-Ming Hsu5, Pei-Jen Lou5, I-How Chen6, Allan Hildesheim7, Chien-Jen Chen2,8.
Abstract
Evidence on the association between dietary component, dietary pattern and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is scarce. A major challenge is the high degree of correlation among dietary constituents. We aimed to identify dietary pattern associated with NPC and to illustrate the dose-response relationship between the identified dietary pattern scores and the risk of NPC. Taking advantage of a matched NPC case-control study, data from a total of 319 incident cases and 319 matched controls were analyzed. Dietary pattern was derived employing partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) performed on energy-adjusted food frequencies derived from a 66-item food-frequency questionnaire. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with multiple conditional logistic regression models, linking pattern scores and NPC risk. A high score of the PLS-DA derived pattern was characterized by high intakes of fruits, milk, fresh fish, vegetables, tea, and eggs ordered by loading values. We observed that one unit increase in the scores was associated with a significantly lower risk of NPC (ORadj = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.60-0.88) after controlling for potential confounders. Similar results were observed among Epstein-Barr virus seropositive subjects. An NPC protective diet is indicated with more phytonutrient-rich plant foods (fruits, vegetables), milk, other protein-rich foods (in particular fresh fish and eggs), and tea. This information may be used to design potential dietary regimen for NPC prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27249558 PMCID: PMC4889039 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sociodemographics, Lifestyle, and Viral Status of 319 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cases and 319 Matched Controls.
| Characteristic/Category | Cases | Controls | P-value | Adj. OR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 220 (69.0) | 220 (69.0) | 1.00 | |
| Female | 99 (31.0) | 99 (31.0) | ||
| Age (mean ± SD), years | 45.6 ± 11.6 | 46.0 ± 11.7 | 0.62 | |
| Age, years | ||||
| <40 | 103 (32.3) | 102 (32.0) | 1.00 | |
| 40–49 | 93 (29.1) | 94 (29.5) | ||
| 50–59 | 77 (24.1) | 74 (23.2) | ||
| 60–69 | 42 (13.2) | 45 (14.0) | ||
| ≧70 | 4 (1.3) | 4 (1.3) | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Mainlander | 34 (9.2) | 68 (21.2) | <0.0001 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Fukienese | 305 (82.2) | 234 (72.9) | 2.56 (1.57–4.18) | |
| Hakka | 32 (8.6) | 19 (5.9) | 3.13 (1.52–6.44) | |
| Educational level | ||||
| Junior high school or below | 189 (59.3) | 160 (50.2) | 0.02 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Senior high school or above | 130 (40.7) | 159 (49.8) | 0.59 (0.41–0.86) | |
| Smoking habit | ||||
| 0–25 years | 241 (75.6) | 256 (80.3) | 0.15 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Smoker ≧25 years | 78 (24.4) | 63 (19.7) | 1.64 (1.01–2.68) | |
| Alcohol drinking habit | ||||
| 0–10 years | 250 (78.4) | 247 (77.7) | 0.83 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| ≧10 years | 69 (21.6) | 71 (22.3) | 0.99 (0.66–1.47) | |
| Formaldehyde exposure | ||||
| No | 260 (81.5) | 278 (81.2) | 0.05 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Yes | 59 (18.5) | 41 (12.8) | 1.61 (1.02–2.53) | |
| Wood dust exposure | ||||
| No | 276 (86.5) | 293 (91.9) | 0.03 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Yes | 43 (13.5) | 26 (8.1) | 1.83 (1.06–3.17) | |
| Nitrosamine from foods | ||||
| Q1 (low) | 64 (20.1) | 80 (25.1) | 0.18 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Q2 | 71 (22.3) | 81 (25.4) | 1.23 (0.76–1.99) | |
| Q3 | 84 (26.3) | 78 (24.4) | 1.63 (0.98–2.70) | |
| Q4 (high) | 100 (31.3) | 80 (25.1) | 1.78 (1.11–2.88) | |
| NPC family history | ||||
| No | 296 (93.1) | 313 (99.1) | 0.0001 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Yes | 22 (6.9) | 3 (0.9) | 6.96 (2.07–23.44) | |
| Anti-EBV seropositive | ||||
| No | 2 (0.6) | 216 (68.8) | <0.0001 | 1.00 (Ref.) |
| Yes | 313 (99.4) | 98 (31.2) | 243.60 (32.07->999) |
Adj., adjusted; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ref., referent, SD, standard deviation.
a Significant difference between cases and controls were assessed using a Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables.
b Adjusted for age.
c Adjusted for age, and ethnicity.
d Those who moved to Taiwan in the past few decades.
e Nitrosamine index was calculated from food consumption. Index values were categorized into quartiles based on the distribution among the controls, and those in the lowest quartile were used as the referent group.
Factor Loading Values Obtained by Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis Method, the Spearman Correlation Coefficients between Food Groups and Factor Scores.
| Food Groups | Factor loadings | Correlation with Factor Scores |
|---|---|---|
| -0.43 | ||
| -0.41 | ||
| -0.38 | ||
| -0.27 | ||
| -0.28 | ||
| -0.29 | ||
| Coffee | -0.19 | -0.13 |
| Nuts | -0.18 | -0.22 |
| Legumes | -0.16 | -0.21 |
| Poultry | -0.15 | -0.25 |
| Salted fish | -0.15 | -0.11 |
| Soybean products | -0.14 | -0.22 |
| Seafood other small fish | -0.11 | -0.23 |
| Dry bean products | -0.09 | -0.08 |
| Smoked foods | -0.09 | -0.12 |
| Red meat | -0.08 | -0.12 |
| Processed meat | -0.05 | -0.06 |
| Raw meat | -0.05 | -0.18 |
| Processed vegetables | -0.05 | -0.05 |
| Sauces | -0.02 | -0.14 |
| Animal oil for cooking | 0.02 | 0.16 |
| Vegetable oil for cooking | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Liver | 0.13 | 0.03 |
| Fried foods | 0.19 | 0.04 |
* p-value < 0.05;
** p-value < 0.001;
*** p-value <0.0001.
a Pattern was derived with partial least squares regression with nasopharyngeal carcinoma disease as the dependent variable and 24 food groups as the predictor variables. Food groups with absolute values of factor loadings ≧0.20 were marked in bold style.
b The dietary pattern obtained from PLS-DA explained 4.8% of the variance in response variables, and 6.7% of the variance in all food groups.
Distribution of Potential Confounders and Mean Food Frequency by Quartiles of Dietary Factor Scores.
| Quartiles of Factor Scores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| Variables | −11.1 (−13.5 to −2.1) | −16.0 (−18.1 to −13.6) | −21.2(−24.0 to −18.2) | −27.7 (−55.9 to −24.0) | P for Trend |
| Potential NPC confounder | |||||
| Age, years | 46.2 | 45.4 | 46.0 | 45.9 | 1.00 |
| Gender, male, % | 67.8 | 64.0 | 67.9 | 78.7 | 0.67 |
| Ethnicity, Fukienese, % | 82.3 | 80.7 | 73.6 | 73.1 | 0.02 |
| Senior high school or above, % | 36.8 | 40.6 | 42.3 | 61.3 | <0.0001 |
| Smokers≧25 years, % | 20.9 | 25.1 | 22.4 | 19.9 | 0.66 |
| Alcohol drinker≧10 years, % | 21.3 | 19.5 | 24.5 | 22.6 | 0.54 |
| Formaldehyde exposure, % | 16.9 | 13.9 | 18.8 | 13.1 | 0.61 |
| Wood dust exposure, % | 15.1 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 8.7 | 0.10 |
| Nitrosamine | 53.4 | 28.9 | 18.9 | 11.9 | <0.0001 |
| NPC family history, % | 8.9 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 0.01 |
| Anti-EBV seropositive, % | 74.3 | 71.3 | 60.5 | 55.3 | <0.0001 |
| Food group (times/week) | |||||
| Fruits | 4.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | <0.0001 |
| Milk | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 4.0 | <0.0001 |
| Fresh fish | 2.8 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 6.7 | <0.0001 |
| Vegetables | 27.4 | 30.8 | 32.8 | 35.8 | <0.0001 |
| Tea | 4.0 | 4.5 | 7.6 | 12.2 | <0.0001 |
| Eggs | 3.3 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 5.7 | <0.0001 |
| Coffee | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 0.83 |
| Nuts | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.6 | <0.0001 |
| Legumes | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.8 | <0.0001 |
| Poultry | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 2.4 | <0.0001 |
| Salted fish | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.91 |
| Soybean products | 4.8 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 7.6 | <0.0001 |
| Seafood other small fish | 2.1 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| Dry bean products | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.08 |
| Smoked foods | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.05 |
| Red meat | 7.8 | 6.8 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 0.06 |
| Processed meat | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.00 |
| Raw meat | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.04 |
| Processed vegetables | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.55 |
| Sauces | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 0.05 |
| Animal oil for cooking | 9.7 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| Vegetable oil for cooking | 30.3 | 29.3 | 28.7 | 27.1 | 0.37 |
| Liver | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.75 |
| Fried foods | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.57 |
Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile.
a Median and interquartile range of dietary factor scores.
b Values are age-adjusted means or percent (%).
c Nitrosamine index was calculated from food consumption. Index values were categorized into quartiles based on the distribution among the controls.
d Values are age and total energy-adjusted means.
Odds Ratios (ORs) of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Corresponding 95% CIs According to Quartiles of Factor Scores and Continuous Factors Scores from Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis.
| Quartile of Dietary Pattern Scores | Continuous | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||
| Subjects | Adj. OR (95% CI) | Adj. OR (95% CI) | Adj. OR (95% CI) | Adj. OR (95% CI) | P for Trend | Adj. OR (95% CI) |
| Cases / Controls | 104/55 | 83/77 | 70/89 | 62/98 | ||
| Crude | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.58 (0.37–0.94) | 0.42 (0.27–0.67) | 0.34 (0.21–0.54) | <0.0001 | 0.70 (0.60–0.81) |
| M1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.60 (0.38–0.97) | 0.44 (0.27–0.69) | 0.35 (0.22–0.55) | <0.0001 | 0.70 (0.61–0.82) |
| M2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.63 (0.38–1.06) | 0.50 (0.30–0.83) | 0.34 (0.20–0.59) | <0.0001 | 0.71 (0.60–0.84) |
| M3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.67 (0.39–1.14) | 0.51 (0.30–0.88) | 0.38 (0.21–0.69) | 0.001 | 0.73 (0.60–0.88) |
Adj., adjusted; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile; Ref., referent.
a Median of factor scores among all subjects: Q1, −11.1; Q2, −16.0; Q3, −21.2; Q4, −27.7.
b M1: adjusted for age.
c M2: M1 with further adjustment for ethnicity, educational level, NPC family history, total caloric intake, years of cigarette smoking, and exposures to formaldehyde and wood dust.
d M3: M2 with further adjustment for intake of green tea and nitrosamine.