BACKGROUND: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more accurately than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. HYPOTHESIS: New CKD-EPI equations improve risk stratification in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and provide complementary information to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. METHODS: We studied 350 subjects (mean age, 68 ± 12 years; 70% male) with NSTE-ACS. Estimated GFR was calculated using the MDRD and new CKD-EPI equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and/or cystatin C (CysC) concentrations obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was all-cause death during follow-up. RESULTS: Over the study period (median, 648 days [interquartile range, 236-1042 days]), 31 patients died (0.05% events per person-year). Decedents had poorer renal-function parameters (P < 0.001). Both CysC-based CKD-EPI equations had the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of all-cause mortality. After multivariate adjustment, only CysC-based CKD-EPI equations were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (CKD-EPISCr - CysC , per mL/min/1.73 m(2) : hazard ratio: 0.975, 95% confidence interval: 0.956-0.994, P = 0.009; CKD-EPICysC , per mL/min/1.73 m(2) : hazard ratio: 0.976, 95% confidence interval: 0.959-0.993, P = 0.005). Reclassification analyses showed that only CysC-based CKD-EPI equations improved predictive accuracy of the GRACE risk score. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTE-ACS, CysC-based CKD-EPI equations improved clinical risk stratification for mortality and added complementary prognostic information to the GRACE risk score.
BACKGROUND:Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more accurately than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. HYPOTHESIS: New CKD-EPI equations improve risk stratification in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and provide complementary information to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. METHODS: We studied 350 subjects (mean age, 68 ± 12 years; 70% male) with NSTE-ACS. Estimated GFR was calculated using the MDRD and new CKD-EPI equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) and/or cystatin C (CysC) concentrations obtained within 48 hours of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was all-cause death during follow-up. RESULTS: Over the study period (median, 648 days [interquartile range, 236-1042 days]), 31 patients died (0.05% events per person-year). Decedents had poorer renal-function parameters (P < 0.001). Both CysC-based CKD-EPI equations had the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of all-cause mortality. After multivariate adjustment, only CysC-based CKD-EPI equations were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (CKD-EPISCr - CysC , per mL/min/1.73 m(2) : hazard ratio: 0.975, 95% confidence interval: 0.956-0.994, P = 0.009; CKD-EPICysC , per mL/min/1.73 m(2) : hazard ratio: 0.976, 95% confidence interval: 0.959-0.993, P = 0.005). Reclassification analyses showed that only CysC-based CKD-EPI equations improved predictive accuracy of the GRACE risk score. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTE-ACS, CysC-based CKD-EPI equations improved clinical risk stratification for mortality and added complementary prognostic information to the GRACE risk score.
Authors: Jacobien C Verhave; Ron T Gansevoort; Hans L Hillege; Dick De Zeeuw; Gary C Curhan; Paul E De Jong Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: C Michael Gibson; Raphaelle L Dumaine; Eli V Gelfand; Sabina A Murphy; David A Morrow; Stephen D Wiviott; Robert P Giugliano; Christopher P Cannon; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tomas Jernberg; Bertil Lindahl; Stefan James; Anders Larsson; Lars-Olof Hansson; Lars Wallentin Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kim A Eagle; Michael J Lim; Omar H Dabbous; Karen S Pieper; Robert J Goldberg; Frans Van de Werf; Shaun G Goodman; Christopher B Granger; P Gabriel Steg; Joel M Gore; Andrzej Budaj; Alvaro Avezum; Marcus D Flather; Keith A A Fox Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jassim Al Suwaidi; Donal N Reddan; Kathryn Williams; Karen S Pieper; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Christopher B Granger; E Magnus Ohman; David R Holmes Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cheng Suh-Chiou; Rosa M Moysés; Marcio S Bittencourt; Isabela M Bensenor; Paulo A Lotufo Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca; Juan Miguel Ruiz-Nodar; Antonio Tello-Montoliu; María Asunción Esteve-Pastor; Miriam Quintana-Giner; Andrea Véliz-Martínez; Esteban Orenes-Piñero; Ana Isabel Romero-Aniorte; Nuria Vicente-Ibarra; Vicente Pernias-Escrig; Luna Carrillo-Alemán; Elena Candela-Sánchez; Ignacio Hortelano; Beatriz Villamía; Miriam Sandín-Rollán; Laura Nuñez-Martínez; Mariano Valdés; Francisco Marín Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 5.501