BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected or confirmed non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitute a large and heterogeneous group. Measurements of renal function such as serum creatinine and estimation of creatinine clearance carry independent prognostic information in this population. Cystatin C is a new and better marker of renal function than creatinine. The aim was therefore to evaluate the prognostic value of cystatin C in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cystatin C was analyzed on admission in 726 patients admitted because of symptoms suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome and no ST-segment elevations. Patients were followed up with regard to death and myocardial infarction for a median of 40 and 6 months, respectively. The median cystatin C level was 1.00 mg/L (25th to 75th percentile, 0.83 to 1.24 mg/L). The risk of death during follow-up increased with increasing levels of cystatin C. In the group with non-ST-elevation ACS, patients in the second, third, and fourth quartiles had a relative risk of subsequent death of 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.3), 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 8.5), and 11.7 (95% CI, 4.7 to 29.3) compared with the lowest quartile. In Cox regression models including well-known predictors of outcome, cystatin C level was independently associated with mortality but not with the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction. In a comparison of the markers of renal function in receiver-operating curve analyses, cystatin C had the best ability to discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of cystatin C will substantially improve the early risk stratification of patients with suspected or confirmed non-ST-elevation ACS.
BACKGROUND:Patients with suspected or confirmed non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitute a large and heterogeneous group. Measurements of renal function such as serum creatinine and estimation of creatinine clearance carry independent prognostic information in this population. Cystatin C is a new and better marker of renal function than creatinine. The aim was therefore to evaluate the prognostic value of cystatin C in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS:Cystatin C was analyzed on admission in 726 patients admitted because of symptoms suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome and no ST-segment elevations. Patients were followed up with regard to death and myocardial infarction for a median of 40 and 6 months, respectively. The median cystatin C level was 1.00 mg/L (25th to 75th percentile, 0.83 to 1.24 mg/L). The risk of death during follow-up increased with increasing levels of cystatin C. In the group with non-ST-elevation ACS, patients in the second, third, and fourth quartiles had a relative risk of subsequent death of 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.3), 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2 to 8.5), and 11.7 (95% CI, 4.7 to 29.3) compared with the lowest quartile. In Cox regression models including well-known predictors of outcome, cystatin C level was independently associated with mortality but not with the risk of subsequent myocardial infarction. In a comparison of the markers of renal function in receiver-operating curve analyses, cystatin C had the best ability to discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of cystatin C will substantially improve the early risk stratification of patients with suspected or confirmed non-ST-elevation ACS.
Authors: R Lertnawapan; A Bian; Y H Rho; P Raggi; A Oeser; J F Solus; T Gebretsadik; A Shintani; C M Stein Journal: Lupus Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Min Ji Shin; Sang Heon Song; Ihm Soo Kwak; Soo Bong Lee; Dong Won Lee; Eun Young Seong; Il Young Kim; Harin Rhee; Naria Lee Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 2.801
Authors: Pedro J Flores-Blanco; Ángel López-Cuenca; James L Januzzi; Francisco Marín; Marianela Sánchez-Martínez; Miriam Quintana-Giner; Ana I Romero-Aniorte; Mariano Valdés; Sergio Manzano-Fernández Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: David Singh; Mary A Whooley; Joachim H Ix; Sadia Ali; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Eun Hee Kim; Ji Hee Yu; Sang Ah Lee; Eui Young Kim; Won Gu Kim; Seung Hun Lee; Eun Hee Cho; Eun Hee Koh; Woo Je Lee; Min-Seon Kim; Joong-Yeol Park; Ki-Up Lee Journal: Korean Diabetes J Date: 2010-04-30