| Literature DB >> 27248693 |
Guido Valverde1, María Inés Barreto Romero2, Isabel Flores Espinoza2, Alan Cooper1, Lars Fehren-Schmitz3, Bastien Llamas1, Wolfgang Haak1,4.
Abstract
The analysis of ancient human DNA from South America allows the exploration of pre-Columbian population history through time and to directly test hypotheses about cultural and demographic evolution. The Middle Horizon (650-1100 AD) represents a major transitional period in the Central Andes, which is associated with the development and expansion of ancient Andean empires such as Wari and Tiwanaku. These empires facilitated a series of interregional interactions and socio-political changes, which likely played an important role in shaping the region's demographic and cultural profiles. We analyzed individuals from three successive pre-Columbian cultures present at the Huaca Pucllana archaeological site in Lima, Peru: Lima (Early Intermediate Period, 500-700 AD), Wari (Middle Horizon, 800-1000 AD) and Ychsma (Late Intermediate Period, 1000-1450 AD). We sequenced 34 complete mitochondrial genomes to investigate the potential genetic impact of the Wari Empire in the Central Coast of Peru. The results indicate that genetic diversity shifted only slightly through time, ruling out a complete population discontinuity or replacement driven by the Wari imperialist hegemony, at least in the region around present-day Lima. However, we caution that the very subtle genetic contribution of Wari imperialism at the particular Huaca Pucllana archaeological site might not be representative for the entire Wari territory in the Peruvian Central Coast.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27248693 PMCID: PMC4889149 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of Wari and Tiwanaku expansion in South America during the Middle Horizon.
Adapted from [15].
Haplogroup determination and mtDNA genomic coverage for Huaca Pucllana samples.
| # | Sample number | Culture | Haplogroup | Coverage of the mitogenome | Average coverage depth per position (min–max) | StdDev | Additional mutations from the hg node | GenBank accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10791 | Lima | A2 | 100% | 122.7 (1–59) | 13.5 | C64T, 356.1C, T1189C, A5222G, T15289C, G16129A!, T16189C! | KU523266 | |
| 10814 | Lima | B2 | 100% | 164.6 (9–186) | 14.3 | T2857C, T5082C, T5277C, A15924G, T16330C | KU523287 | |
| 10802 | Lima | B2 | 100% | 63.4 (1–105) | 14.4 | C16168T | KU523286 | |
| 10789 | Lima | B2b | 100% | 100.2 (5–141) | 15.1 | G6261A, G9055A, A12972G, A14053G | KU523283 | |
| 10817 | Lima | C1b | 100% | 132.2 (5–169) | 16.4 | A9468G, C12535T, T15313C, A16166C, T16223C | KU523324 | |
| 10820 | Lima | C1b | 100% | 84.6 (1–135) | 15.8 | A9468G, C12535T, T15313C, A16166C, T16223C | KU523325 | |
| 10806 | Lima | C1c | 100% | 73.4 (1–117) | 17.1 | T152C!, 7472d, T8450C, C12774T, T16172C, T16297C | KU523322 | |
| 10811 | Lima | D4/ Pre-D1/D1 | 99. 99% | 50.4 (0–97) | 14.9 | G143A, T2092C!, A6113G, T16189C!, G16274A, C16365T | KU523345 | |
| 10821 | Lima | B2 | 100% | 98.2 (1–149) | 19.9 | T146C!,T3786C, A8170G, G15777A | KU523288 | |
| 10774 | Wari | A2 | 100% | 67.7 (1–115) | 18.1 | C64T, A675G, A3354, T6911C, A13966G, C14800A, G16145A | KU523264 | |
| 10754 | Wari | B2b | 100% | 48.8 (1–99) | 17 | A243G, C4013T, G8994A, G11016A, G12127A, A14059G, G16438A | KU523282 | |
| 10734 | Wari | C1b | 100% | 59.8 (1–104) | 17.3 | C12535T, T15313C, A16166C, G16244T | KU523317 | |
| 10763 | Wari | C1b | 99.90% | 20.7 (0–55) | 9 | C12535T, T15313C | KU523318 | |
| 10771 | Wari | C1b | 98.80% | 18.2 (0–50) | 8.2 | A9468G, C12535T, T15313C, A16166C | KU523320 | |
| 10773 | Wari | C1b | 100% | 78.0 (0–119) | 15.2 | T8380C, T13281C, A13710C, A15244G, C15315T, A16207G | KU523321 | |
| 10778 | Wari | A2 | 97.60% | 20.5 (0–100) | 15.6 | C64T, T1189C, T3786C, A5222G, C5765T, A7673G, T8738C, T15289C, C16221T, G12127A | KU523265 | |
| 10765 | Wari | C1b | 99.80% | 105.2 (0–340) | 62.5 | C12535T, T15313C, A16166C, G16244T | KU523319 | |
| 10750 | Wari | B2b | 98.70% | 22.3 (0–97) | 16.7 | T152C!, G1797A, A9377G, G12127A, A14053G, C14428T | KU523281 | |
| 10742 | Wari | B2b | 100% | 84.3 (0–248) | 40.2 | A178G, A6779G, A10420G, C16278T! C16295T | KU523280 | |
| 10713 | Ychsma | B2 | 100% | 109.5 (2–163) | 21.9 | 573.1C, A5186G, C5375T, C5895T, G15884A | KU523276 | |
| 10729 | Ychsma | B2 | 100% | 101.6 (0–171) | 24.8 | T152C!, A2880G, C7786T, C13934T, A16051G, C16360T | KU523279 | |
| 10720 | Ychsma | B2b | 100% | 171.6 (19–191) | 14.4 | G6261A, G9055A, A14053G, C15647T | KU523277 | |
| 10726 | Ychsma | B2b | 99.96% | 38.5 (0–88) | 14.7 | G143A, T9078C, G10530A, A14053G, G16390A | KU523278 | |
| 10709 | Ychsma | C1b | 100% | 146.6 (0–176) | 18.1 | C12535T, T15313C | KU523313 | |
| 10717 | Ychsma | C1b | 100% | 175 (18–191) | 11.9 | C150T, T152C!, C12535T, T15313C, C16292T | KU523314 | |
| 10725 | Ychsma | C1b | 100% | 177.9 (0–192) | 16.6 | C12535T, T15313C | KU523315 | |
| 10731 | Ychsma | C1b | 100% | 182 (0–193) | 17.7 | A636G, C3442T, C4496T, G5821A, A5894C, G16000A, T16362C | KU523316 | |
| 10722 | Ychsma | D1 | 100% | 140.8 (0–181) | 21 | T11365C, G11906A, T12481C, C12557T, A14665G | KU523342 | |
| 10732 | Ychsma | D4/ Pre-D1/D1 | 100% | 146.6 (0–180) | 18.1 | G143A, T2092C!, A6113G, T16189C!, G16274A, C16365T | KU523343 | |
| 10730 | Ychsma | B2b | 99.80% | 46.0 (0–102) | 20.2 | T131C, C4013T, G13708A, T14634C, T15784C | KU523275 | |
| 10805 | Ychsma | D1 | 100% | 159.5 (7–186) | 13.1 | T11365C, G11906A, T12481C, C12557T, A14665G | KU523344 | |
| 10810 | Ychsma | C1d | 99.90% | 90.3 (0–166) | 39.4 | A14122G | KU523323 | |
| 10794 | Ychsma | B2 | 99.60% | 16.8 (0–54) | 8.9 | G8290A, A16066G | KU523284 | |
| 10800 | Ychsma | B2b | 100% | 127.6 (4–166) | 17.2 | T131C,C4013T, G13708A, T14634C, C14873A, T15784C | KU523285 |
Additional variants from the sub-haplogroup nodes compared to RSRS [30]. We generally follow the nomenclature of Phylotree.org [31], in describing variants: Reversions (back mutations) to an ancestral state are indicated with an exclamation mark (!), while 7472d and 356.1C denotes a deletion or insertion at the given nucleotide position, respectively.
Fig 2Mitochondrial DNA sub-haplogroup frequencies from Huaca Pucllana across cultural periods.
Lima culture: EIP (500–700 AD), Wari culture: MH (800–1000 AD) and Ychsma culture: LIP (1000–1450 AD).
Summary statistics of ancient populations analyzed in this study.
| Population pairwise | Genetic diversity | Neutrality test | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lima | Wari | Ychsma | Tajima’s D | p-value | Fu’s FS | p-value | |||||
| 0 | 0.1905 | 0.6658 | 8 | 0.9722 (0.0640) | 0.002331 (0.001272) | -0.13498 | 0.47000 | 1.44409 | 0.67400 | ||
| -0.05197 (0.64865–1) | 0 | 0.2144 | 9 | 0.9778 (0.0540) | 0.002492 (0.001340) | 0.18623 | 0.62400 | 1.08278 | 0.60900 | ||
| -0.06111 (0.87387–1) | -0.00770 (0.32432–0.97296) | 0 | 13 | 0.9810 (0.0308) | 0.002159 (0.001117) | 0.31343 | 0.66300 | 0.31237 | 0.51100 | ||
* p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni correction) using the R script p.adjust (The R Project for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org/).
N: Number of individuals, H: Number of haplotypes, h: Haplotype diversity, π: Nucleotide diversity
Fig 3Phylogenetic network of mtDNA haplotypes from Huaca Pucllana.
Fig 4Multidimensional scaling plot (MDS) based on Slatkin’s FST.
Genetic affinities of Huaca Pucllana cultural groups compared with modern and ancient populations from South America.
Fig 5(A-B) View of the Huaca Pucllana archaeological site in Lima, Peru. (C) Wari funerary fardo “La Dama de la Máscara” (Credits: Huaca Pucllana research. Conservation and revalorization project).
Radiocarbon dates from selected samples from Huaca Pucllana.
| Sample number | Culture | Relative date | hg | ORAU# | Delta 13 C | uncal BP | IntCal13 cal AD | 2-sigma | SH13Cal13 cal AD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lima | 100–650 AD | A2 | OxA-31118 | -11.79 | 1420±29 | 584–660 (95.4%) | 584–660 | 603–760 (95.4%) | |
| Lima | 100–650 AD | C1b | OxA-31120 | -13.8 | 1493±30 | 534–642 (90.6%) | 435–642 | 549–652 (95.4%) | |
| Wari | 500–1000 AD | C1b | OxA-31422 | -12.65 | 1156±22 | 776–968 (95.4%) | 776–968 | 891–988 (95.4%) | |
| Wari | 500–1000 AD | B2b | OxA-31423 | -12.61 | 955±65 | 974–1220 (95.4%) | 974–1220 | 1016–1264 (95.4%) | |
| Ychsma | 1100–1440 AD | C1b | OxA-31424 | -9.6 | 745±23 | 1244–1288 (92.9%) | 1226–1288 | 1271–1315 (72.9%) | |
| Ychsma | 100–650 AD | D1 | OxA-31462 | -13,38 | 762±23 | 1223–1280 (95.4%) | 1223–1280 | 1231–1379 (95.3%) | |
| Ychsma | 100–650 AD | C1d | OxA-31119 | -12.18 | 866±28 | 1149–1249 (80%) | 1048–1249 | 1164–1272 (95.4%) | |
| Ychsma | 1100–1440 AD | D1 | OxA-31425 | -12.49 | 773±24 | 1221–1278 (95.4%) | 1221–1278 | 1227–1301 (93.9%) |
Radiocarbon dates were calibrated using the OxCal Program v.4.2 from University of Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit.