| Literature DB >> 27247770 |
Carlos Frederico Marques Guimarães1, Eliane Teixeira Mársico1, Maria Lúcia Guerra Monteiro1, Môsar Lemos1, Sergio Borges Mano1, Carlos Adam Conte Junior1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the chemical quality parameters regarding frozen Pangasius hypophthalmus specimens from Vietnam. The proximate composition, pH, ammonia, biogenic amines (BAs), total mercury (Hg), malondialdehyde (MDA), and polyphosphate were determined. The moisture, protein, lipid and ash values were between 83.83-85.59, 12.51-14.52, 1.09-1.65, and 0.76-2.38 g 100 g(-1), respectively. Fraud by excessive polyphosphate addition was detected in 30% of the samples whereas Hg above the recommended limit was observed in 50% of the samples. With regard to compounds from the degradation process, low concentrations of individual BAs and pH values were found in this study and ranged from 5.88 to 6.18, except for samples with polyphosphate >1 g 100(-1) (pH > 7.00) were observed in the present study. However, ammonia concentration indicated that a degradation process initiated in 80% of the samples (0.12-0.34 NH 3 g(-1)) and 20% of the samples (1.87-1.94 μg NH 3 g(-1)) were in an advanced deterioration process. Furthermore, MDA values (1.21-7.88 mg kg(-1)) suggested some failures, mainly during transportation and/or storage. We concluded that quality control measures must be implemented on the Pangasius production chain to improve the quality of products provided to consumers worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: DMA‐80; HPLC; fraud; freshwater fish; mercury; sutchi catfish
Year: 2015 PMID: 27247770 PMCID: PMC4867760 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Proximate composition of Pangasius hypophthalmus fillets from Vietnam marketed in Brazil
| Samples | Composition (g 100 g−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | Protein | Lipid | Ash | |
| 1 | 84.82 ± 0.08 | 12.51 ± 0.07 | 1.65 ± 0.04 | 0.77 ± 0.04 |
| 2 | 83.83 ± 0.06 | 13.04 ± 0.04 | 1.30 ± 0.06 | 1.07 ± 0.07 |
| 3 | 84.17 ± 0.06 | 13.21 ± 0.07 | 1.19 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.04 |
| 4 | 83.84 ± 0.08 | 14.52 ± 0.05 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| 5 | 84.18 ± 0.08 | 13.85 ± 0.04 | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.04 |
| 6 | 84.06 ± 0.07 | 13.56 ± 0.05 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.03 |
| 7 | 84.24 ± 0.06 | 14.10 ± 0.04 | 1.20 ± 0.05 | 0.95 ± 0.05 |
| 8 | 85.59 ± 0.06 | 12.69 ± 0.02 | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 2.38 ± 0.06 |
| 9 | 85.05 ± 0.06 | 13.55 ± 0.06 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | 84.22 ± 0.01 | 13.94 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.04 |
Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Physicochemical parameters of Pangasius hypophthalmus fillets from Vietnam marketed in Brazil
| Samples | MDA | Hg | pH | Ammonia | Polyphosphate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.63 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 7.93 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 2.20 ± 0.03 |
| 2 | 1.52 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 6.00 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| 3 | 1.79 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 6.15 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.00 |
| 4 | 1.21 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 5.91 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | ND |
| 5 | 2.53 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 6.11 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| 6 | 1.93 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 6.18 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.00 |
| 7 | 3.55 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.00 | 5.89 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
| 8 | 7.44 ± 0.02 | 0.76 ± 0.00 | 8.01 ± 0.02 | 1.87 ± 0.03 | 10.74 ± 0.02 |
| 9 | 7.88 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 7.20 ± 0.00 | 1.94 ± 0.03 | 4.93 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | 3.58 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 5.88 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
ND, not detectable.
Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
MDA and Hg results were expressed as mg kg−1.
Ammonia values were expressed as μg NH3 g−1.
Polyphosphate results were expressed as g 100 g−1.
Biogenic amines in Pangasius hypophthalmus fillets from Vietnam marketed in Brazil
| Samples | Biogenic amines (mg kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putrescine | Cadaverine | Histamine | Spermine | Spermidine | |
| 1 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | ND | 0.68 ± 0.00 | 1.59 ± 0.01 |
| 2 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | ND | 0.80 ± 0.00 | 1.49 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | 1.74 ± 0.01 |
| 4 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 1.80 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 1.67 ± 0.01 |
| 6 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 1.38 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 1.49 ± 0.01 |
| 7 | 1.20 ± 0.02 | 1.45 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 1.70 ± 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 1.19 ± 0.01 | ND | 2.98 ± 0.01 | 4.41 ± 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | ND | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 1.67 ± 0.01 |
| 10 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.00 | ND | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
ND, not detectable.
Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.