Literature DB >> 27247475

A Critical Review of Available Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Future Directions.

Jennifer P Montgomery1, John A Kaufman2.   

Abstract

Inferior vena cava filters have been placed in patients for decades for protection against pulmonary embolism. The widespread use of filters has dramatically increased owing at least in part to the approval of retrievable vena cava filters. Retrievable filters have the potential to protect against pulmonary embolism and then be retrieved once no longer needed to avoid potential long-term complications. There are several retrievable vena cava filters available for use. This article discusses the different filter designs as well as the published data on these available filters. When selecting a filter for use, it is important to consider the potential short-term complications and the filters' window for retrieval. Understanding potential long-term complications is also critical, as these devices are approved for permanent placement and many filters are not retrieved. Finally, this article will address research into new designs that may be the future of vena cava filtration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep venous thrombosis; inferior vena cava filter; interventional radiology; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolic event

Year:  2016        PMID: 27247475      PMCID: PMC4862852          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0739-9529            Impact factor:   1.513


  47 in total

1.  Long-term retrieval success rate profile for the Günther Tulip vena cava filter.

Authors:  H Bob Smouse; David Rosenthal; Van Ha Thuong; Michael F Knox; Robert G Dixon; William D Voorhees; Jennifer A McCann-Brown
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group.

Authors:  H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pilot study evaluating the safety of a combined central venous catheter and inferior vena cava filter in critically ill patients at high risk of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Carlos A Cadavid; Bladimir Gil; Alvaro Restrepo; Sergio Alvarez; Santiago Echeverry; Luis F Angel; Victor Tapson; John Kaufman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  The RETRIEVE trial: safety and effectiveness of the retrievable crux vena cava filter.

Authors:  H Bob Smouse; Robert Mendes; Marc Bosiers; Thuong G Van Ha; Tami Crabtree
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  The safety and effectiveness of the retrievable option inferior vena cava filter: a United States prospective multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Matthew S Johnson; Albert A Nemcek; James F Benenati; Dirk S Baumann; Bart L Dolmatch; John A Kaufman; Mark J Garcia; Michael S Stecker; Anthony C Venbrux; Ziv J Haskal; Rui L Avelar
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Infusion of iodine-based contrast agents into poly(p-dioxanone) as a radiopaque resorbable IVC filter.

Authors:  Burapol Singhana; Aaron Chen; Patrick Slattery; Iman K Yazdi; Yang Qiao; Ennio Tasciotti; Michael Wallace; Steven Huang; Mitch Eggers; Marites P Melancon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Short- and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry.

Authors:  Stuart M Lyon; Guillermo Elizondo Riojas; Raman Uberoi; Jai Patel; Mario Enrique Baltazares Lipp; Graham R Plant; Miguel A De Gregorio; Rolf W Günther; William D Voorhees; Jennifer A McCann-Brown
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Preparation and experimental research into retrievable rapamycin- and heparin-coated vena cava filters: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Fuxian Zhang; Gangzhu Liang; Lin Ye; Huan Zhang; Luyuan Niu; Long Cheng; Mingyi Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  PROOF trial: protection from pulmonary embolism with the OptEase filter.

Authors:  J Werner Ziegler; Gary J Dietrich; Sidney A Cohen; Keith Sterling; James Duncan; Michael Samotowka
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Safety and efficacy of the Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: midterm outcomes.

Authors:  Eric K Hoffer; Rebecca J Mueller; Marcus R Luciano; Nicole N Lee; Anne T Michaels; John M Gemery
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Inferior vena cava filter use and patient safety: legacy or science?

Authors:  William Geerts; Rita Selby
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 2.  Back to the Basics: Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Authors:  Brian Covello; Martin Radvany
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

3.  Safety of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Sara Baig; Joseph Bert; Elie Gertner
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Vena Cava Filter Complications: Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Presenting as a Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Patrick G McEnulty; William J Salyers; Akash Joshi
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2019-05-15

5.  Hemodynamic Analysis of VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Jingying Wang; Wen Huang; Yue Zhou; Fangzhou Han; Dong Ke; Chunhian Lee
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.