Literature DB >> 27246940

Rapid Response Team activation in New Zealand hospitals-a multicentre prospective observational study.

A J Psirides1, J Hill2, D Jones3.   

Abstract

We aimed to describe the epidemiology of Rapid Response Team (RRT) activation in New Zealand public hospitals. We undertook a prospective multicentre observational study of RRT activations in 11 hospitals for consecutive 14-day periods during October-December 2014. A standardised case report form was used to collect data on patient demographics, RRT activation criteria and timing, vital signs on RRT arrival, team composition and intervention, treatment limitation and patient outcome at day 30. Three hundred and thirteen patients received 351 RRT calls during the study period. Patients were admitted under a medical specialty in 177 (56.5%) instances. Median duration from hospital admission to first RRT call was two days. Eighty-six percent of RRT calls were to inpatient wards. A total of 43.4% of RRT calls occurred between 0800 and 1700 hours (38% of the day) and 75.5% of RRT calls were activated by ward nurses. A median of three staff attended each call. Common triggers for RRT activation were increased Early Warning Score (56.2%) and staff concern (25.7%). During the RRT call, 2.8% of patients died; 19.8% died by day 30. New 'Not For Resuscitation' orders were written in 22.5% of RRT calls. By day 30, 56.2% of patients had been discharged home alive. In conclusion, RRTs in New Zealand are multidisciplinary, mostly nurse-activated and predominantly respond to deteriorating medical (rather than surgical) patients. Most patients remain on the ward. The RRT frequently implements treatment limitations. Given almost one in five patients die within 30 days, over half of whom die within 72 hours of RRT review, surviving the RRT call may provide false reassurance that the patient will subsequently do well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MET; RRT; RRT activation; RRT call; abnormal vital sign; cardiac arrest; deteriorating patient; in-hospital mortality; medical emergency team; rapid response team

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27246940     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1604400314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  6 in total

1.  [Deployment of the in-hospital emergency team in a tertiary care university hospital : Data analysis for the time period 2013-2016 in North-Rhine/Westphalia].

Authors:  J Schmitz; S Kerkhoff; D Sander; G Schulz; T Warnecke; J Hinkelbein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Characteristics and outcome of rapid response team patients ≥75 years old: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Joonas Tirkkonen; Piritta Setälä; Sanna Hoppu
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Advance care planning in the context of clinical deterioration: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Wendy Pearse; Florin Oprescu; John Endacott; Sarah Goodman; Mervyn Hyde; Maureen O'Neill
Journal:  Palliat Care       Date:  2019-01-19

4.  Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to identify and mitigate failures in a hospital rapid response system (RRS).

Authors:  Ehsan Ullah; Mirza Mansoor Baig; Hamid GholamHosseini; Jun Lu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Prevalence of rapid response systems in small hospitals: A questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Koji Hosokawa; Hiroki Kamada; Kohei Ota; Satoshi Yamaga; Junki Ishii; Nobuaki Shime
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Does the Time of Solitary Rapid Response Team Call Affect Patient Outcome?

Authors:  Manoj Y Singh; Ramprasad Vegunta; Krishna Karpe; Sumeet Rai
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.