| Literature DB >> 27246257 |
Matthew Fisher1, Joshua Knobe2, Brent Strickland3, Frank C Keil1.
Abstract
We present experimental evidence that people's modes of social interaction influence their construal of truth. Participants who engaged in cooperative interactions were less inclined to agree that there was an objective truth about that topic than were those who engaged in a competitive interaction. Follow-up experiments ruled out alternative explanations and indicated that the changes in objectivity are explained by argumentative mindsets: When people are in cooperative arguments, they see the truth as more subjective. These findings can help inform research on moral objectivism and, more broadly, on the distinctive cognitive consequences of different types of social interaction.Entities:
Keywords: Argumentation; Cooperation; Meta-ethics; Objectivity; Social interaction
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27246257 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Sci ISSN: 0364-0213