| Literature DB >> 27245129 |
Obinna C Nwinyi1, Oluseyi O Ajayi2, Olukayode O Amund3.
Abstract
TEntities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene analysis; Competent PAH degraders; Former industrial sites; Soil microbial communities
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27245129 PMCID: PMC4927684 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Cloned fragments of 16S rRNA genomic DNA of PAH degrading bacterial species.
| Bacterial strain | Tentative identity | Confirmed identity | Closest relative | Bacterial subdivision | % ID | Genbank accession no. | Length (nt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB-1 | γ-Proteobacteria | 99 | JN624752 | 841 | |||
| PB-2 | γ-Proteobacteria | 98 | JN624753 | 1299 |
ID identity.
nt nucleotides.
Determination of mean CHN ratio (% w/w).
| Soil sample | Carbon | Hydrogen | Nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 7.778 | 0.285 | 0.178 |
| Sample 2 | 9.745 | 0.393 | 0.249 |
| Sample 3 | 14.363 | 0.816 | 0.459 |
Fig. 1(A) Degradation of naphthalene by MS-benzoate grown cells of PB-1, PB-2, incubated for 14 days. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate determination of initial and final concentration respectively. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes. (B) Naphthlane-dependent growth and cell numbers distribution of strains PB-1, PB-2, in naphthalene incubated for 14 days. Data represent the mean of replicates tubes for initial time (0) cell density represented as (1) and final time (14 days) represented as (3) respectively. The x-axis value range was chosen as such to allow for even spread of the growth curve. The large error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes.
Fig. 2(A) Degradation of chrysene by MS-benzoate grown cells of PB-1 and PB-2, incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate determination of initial and final concentration respectively. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes. (B) Chrysene dependent growth and cell numbers distribution of strains PB-1 and PB-2, in chrysene incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean of replicates tubes for initial time (0) cell density represented as (1) and final time (21 days) represented as (4) respectively. The x-axis value range was chosen as such to allow for even spread of the growth curve. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes.
Fig. 3(A) Degradation of fluoranthene by MS-benzoate grown cells of PB-1 and PB-2, incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate determination of initial and final concentration respectively. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes. (B) Fluoranthene dependent growth and cell numbers distribution of strains PB-1 and PB-2, in chrysene incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean of replicates tubes for initial time (0) cell density represented as (1) and final time (21 days) represented as (4) respectively. The x-axis value range was chosen as such to allow for even spread of the growth curve. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes.
Fig. 4(A) Degradation of pyrene by MS-benzoate grown cells of PB-1 and PB-2, incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate determination of initial and final concentration respectively. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes. (B) Pyrene dependent growth and cell numbers distribution of strains PB-1 and PB-2, in chrysene incubated for 21 days. Data represent the mean of replicates tubes for initial time (0) cell density represented as (1) and final time (21 days) represented as (4) respectively. The x-axis value range was chosen as such to allow for even spread of the growth curve. The error bars (Standard Deviation) were due to differential response of cells in triplicate tubes.
Fig. 5(A) Predictive growth model for PB1 in chrysene. (B) Predictive model for PB2 in chrysene.
Fig. 6(A) Predictive model PB1 in naphthalene. (B) Predictive model PB2 in naphthalene.
Fig. 7(A) Predictive model PB1 in pyrene. (B) Predictive model PB-2 in pyrene.
Fig. 8(A) Predictive model PB1 in fluoranthene. (B) Predictive model PB-2 in fluoranthene.