Chandrika J Piyathilake1, Suguna Badiga1, Michelle M Chambers1, Ilene K Brill2, Roland Matthews3, Edward E Partridge4. 1. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although urine-based testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being explored as a practical approach for cervical cancer screening, whether the results differ by age, race, or indicators of excess body weight or in populations exposed to HPV vaccines has not been documented by previous studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]) by the aforementioned population characteristics. METHODS: The study population consisted of 502 women diagnosed with different grades of CIN. HPV testing was performed with paired urine and cervical cell DNA with the Roche Diagnostics Linear Array test. Agreement coefficient 1 and probabilities were calculated to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and CIN lesions. RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect agreement (0.66-0.83) was observed in the detection of any HPV genotype in urine specimens versus cervical specimens, regardless of the population characteristics. Although the positive predictive value for the detection of CIN lesions was relatively low, the negative predictive value for CIN-3 was high (≥90%) among women positive for any of the urinary or cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes or HPV genotypes not included in currently available HPV vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that urinary HPV testing provides highly satisfactory results for excluding the possibility of any cervical HPV infections, including HPV types not included in vaccines and CIN lesions associated with any HR-HPV, regardless of a woman's age, race, or excess body weight. Cancer 2016.
BACKGROUND: Although urine-based testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being explored as a practical approach for cervical cancer screening, whether the results differ by age, race, or indicators of excess body weight or in populations exposed to HPV vaccines has not been documented by previous studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (grade 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]) by the aforementioned population characteristics. METHODS: The study population consisted of 502 women diagnosed with different grades of CIN. HPV testing was performed with paired urine and cervical cell DNA with the Roche Diagnostics Linear Array test. Agreement coefficient 1 and probabilities were calculated to determine the accuracy of urinary HPV testing for the presence of cervical HPVs and CIN lesions. RESULTS: Substantial to almost perfect agreement (0.66-0.83) was observed in the detection of any HPV genotype in urine specimens versus cervical specimens, regardless of the population characteristics. Although the positive predictive value for the detection of CIN lesions was relatively low, the negative predictive value for CIN-3 was high (≥90%) among women positive for any of the urinary or cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes or HPV genotypes not included in currently available HPV vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that urinary HPV testing provides highly satisfactory results for excluding the possibility of any cervical HPV infections, including HPV types not included in vaccines and CIN lesions associated with any HR-HPV, regardless of a woman's age, race, or excess body weight. Cancer 2016.
Authors: J M Walboomers; M V Jacobs; M M Manos; F X Bosch; J A Kummer; K V Shah; P J Snijders; J Peto; C J Meijer; N Muñoz Journal: J Pathol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Warner K Huh; Kevin A Ault; David Chelmow; Diane D Davey; Robert A Goulart; Francisco A R Garcia; Walter K Kinney; L Stewart Massad; Edward J Mayeaux; Debbie Saslow; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W Lawson; Mark H Einstein Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; K Miriam Elfström; Sara Tunesi; Peter J F Snijders; Marc Arbyn; Henry Kitchener; Nereo Segnan; Clare Gilham; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Johannes Berkhof; Julian Peto; Chris J L M Meijer Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-11-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rubí Hernández-López; Luis Hermosillo; Leith León-Maldonado; Rafael Velázquez-Cruz; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Attila Lörincz; Cosette M Wheeler; F Xavier Bosch; Jack Cuzick; Berenice Rivera-Paredez; Belinda Nedjai; Jorge Salmerón Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240