Literature DB >> 27243351

Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.

Rajesh Sinha1, Mayank Bansal, Namrata Sharma, Tanuj Dada, Radhika Tandon, Jeewan S Titiyal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes between sutured transscleral-fixated and intrascleral haptic-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).
SETTING: Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
DESIGN: A comparative case series.
METHODS: Forty eyes of 40 patients were included; 20 in each group. Patients in group 1 underwent sutured transscleral-fixated IOL and those in group 2 underwent intrascleral haptic-fixated IOL augmented by fibrin glue. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central macular thickness (CMT), IOL tilt on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and pseudophakodonesis on slitlamp and UBM.
RESULTS: The most common cause of aphakia was complicated cataract surgery (50%). The mean preoperative UCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was 1.59±0.24 and 1.63±0.26 in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.45). There was significant improvement in UCVA in both groups (P=0.001) at 6 months (group 1: 0.33±0.17; group 2: 0.22±0.10); the improvement being greater in group 2 (P<0.05). Mean percentage endothelial cell loss and IOP change were comparable. Mean CMT (μm) was 250.95±23.98 and 225.85±21.13 in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.009). Pseudophakodonesis was more in group 1 as assessed on slitlamp (P=0.037) and as assessed on UBM (P=0.046). Macular edema was the most common complication seen more in group 1.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrascleral haptic-fixated IOL provides more stable fixation, better visual outcome, and lesser complication in comparison with sutured transscleral-fixated IOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27243351     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  6 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of modified glued versus flanged intrascleral haptic fixation techniques for secondary intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Amy Yuan; Debarshi Mustafi; Michael R Banitt; Kasra A Rezaei
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  A comparative study of transscleral suture-fixated and scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Yu Mizuno; Yosuke Sugimoto
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Modified Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation Technique Using Two Vitrectomy Ports as Lens Haptic Fixation Sites.

Authors:  Yukihiko Suzuki; Toshio Tando; Kobu Adachi; Takashi Kudo; Mitsuru Nakazawa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-06

4.  Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas for eyes with insufficient capsular support.

Authors:  Zhouyue Li; Zhangkai Lian; Charlotte Aimee Young; Jing Zhao; Guangming Jin; Danying Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  Uveitis and deficient lens capsules: Effect of glued intraocular lens on the visual outcome and the reactivation of inflammation.

Authors:  Dhivya Ashok Kumar; Amar Agarwal; Wasim Raja Kader Ali
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Yanxiu Sun; Maximilian Hammer; Timur M Yildirim; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.