INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Coeliac disease (CD) was believed to be a childhood disease while it can affect any age. AIM: to evaluate the prevalence of CD in elderly population, recording the main clinical features of this group respect to young patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prevalence of CD in an elderly population from 1970 to 2015. We divided patients into three age-groups (group A: 18-34 years; group B: 35-64 years; group C: ≥65 years) and compared them regarding baseline anthropometric and serological variables, clinical features at diagnosis, diagnostic mode, associated autoimmune diseases, and CD-related neoplastic complications. RESULTS: We made 2812 CD diagnoses in adults: 2.5% of them were ≥65 years at diagnosis. When comparing the three groups, we found no differences in sex, haemoglobin, serum iron, albumin, and anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) (p = NS) while as expected, we found higher values of cholesterol, glycaemia, and triglycerides in older patients (p < 0.0001). Elderly had a higher risk of being diagnosed with malabsorption symptoms compared to younger patients (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.3-3.74). No difference in the risk of autoimmune CD-related diseases was seen among groups. Furthermore, we observed 16 neoplastic complications, 13 of them happened in the patients diagnosed with CD aged 35-64 years. The number of CD diagnoses increased over time, particularly in elderly. CONCLUSION: CD diagnosis in elderly population is quite uncommon although not rare. Elderly CD patients have a higher risk of being diagnosed with malabsorption symptoms than younger patients but without increased risk of autoimmune and neoplastic complications.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Coeliac disease (CD) was believed to be a childhood disease while it can affect any age. AIM: to evaluate the prevalence of CD in elderly population, recording the main clinical features of this group respect to young patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prevalence of CD in an elderly population from 1970 to 2015. We divided patients into three age-groups (group A: 18-34 years; group B: 35-64 years; group C: ≥65 years) and compared them regarding baseline anthropometric and serological variables, clinical features at diagnosis, diagnostic mode, associated autoimmune diseases, and CD-related neoplastic complications. RESULTS: We made 2812 CD diagnoses in adults: 2.5% of them were ≥65 years at diagnosis. When comparing the three groups, we found no differences in sex, haemoglobin, serum iron, albumin, and anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) (p = NS) while as expected, we found higher values of cholesterol, glycaemia, and triglycerides in older patients (p < 0.0001). Elderly had a higher risk of being diagnosed with malabsorption symptoms compared to younger patients (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.3-3.74). No difference in the risk of autoimmune CD-related diseases was seen among groups. Furthermore, we observed 16 neoplastic complications, 13 of them happened in the patients diagnosed with CD aged 35-64 years. The number of CD diagnoses increased over time, particularly in elderly. CONCLUSION: CD diagnosis in elderly population is quite uncommon although not rare. Elderly CD patients have a higher risk of being diagnosed with malabsorption symptoms than younger patients but without increased risk of autoimmune and neoplastic complications.
Authors: Allie B Cichewicz; Elizabeth S Mearns; Aliki Taylor; Talia Boulanger; Michele Gerber; Daniel A Leffler; Jennifer Drahos; David S Sanders; Kelly J Thomas Craig; Benjamin Lebwohl Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Marta Silva; Armando Peixoto; Ana Luísa Santos; Pedro Costa-Moreira; Joel Ferreira da Silva; Emanuel Dias; Guilherme Macedo Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-01-10
Authors: Jonathon Snook; Neeraj Bhala; Ian L P Beales; David Cannings; Chris Kightley; Robert Ph Logan; D Mark Pritchard; Reena Sidhu; Sue Surgenor; Wayne Thomas; Ajay M Verma; Andrew F Goddard Journal: Gut Date: 2021-09-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Neil O'Morain; Eileen Shannon; John McManus; Vanessa Warner; Hilary Leeson; Helen O'Donovan; Brian Egan; Valerie Byrnes Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.623