Literature DB >> 2724326

A comparison of Bacteroides ureolyticus isolates from different clinical sources.

B I Duerden1, A Eley, L Goodwin, J T Magee, J M Hindmarch, K W Bennett.   

Abstract

Clinical isolates of corroding, gram-negative, anaerobic bacilli (provisionally identified as Bacteroides ureolyticus) from superficial ulcers and soft tissue infections (15), non-gonococcal, non-chlamydial urethritis (12) and adult periodontal disease (14) were compared with reference strains of B. ureolyticus, B. gracilis and Wolinella recta in a series of conventional tests of morphology, biochemical activity, tolerance of dyes and bile salts, and antibiotic sensitivity, gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of metabolic products, and in whole-cell analysis by pyrolysis-mass spectrometry (Py-MS). A numerical taxonomic approach was used with the results of conventional tests and the grouping obtained was compared with that obtained by Py-MS. All the ulcer and soft-tissue isolates and the urethritis isolates were oxidase- and urease-positive and formed a homogeneous set consistent with the reference strain of B. ureolyticus. The dental isolates differed from B. ureolyticus strains and were heterogeneous amongst themselves. None corresponded with the reference strains of B. gracilis or W. recta. The conventional and Py-MS approaches to characterisation produced similar groupings and each distinguished between a single cluster of ulcer-urethritis strains and several clusters of dental strains, although the dendrograms derived from the two approaches differed in the order of the clusters; in the Py-MS dendrogram one subcluster of four dental strains came within the main ulcer-urethritis cluster and a cluster of five ulcer strains was separated as a distinct group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2724326     DOI: 10.1099/00222615-29-1-63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  10 in total

Review 1.  Identification methods for campylobacters, helicobacters, and related organisms.

Authors:  S L On
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Pathogenic potential of Campylobacter ureolyticus.

Authors:  Jose A Burgos-Portugal; Nadeem O Kaakoush; Mark J Raftery; Hazel M Mitchell
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Restriction endonuclease analysis and ribotyping differentiate genital and nongenital strains of Bacteroides ureolyticus.

Authors:  N Akhtar; A Eley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Oral Campylobacter species: Initiators of a subgroup of inflammatory bowel disease?

Authors:  Li Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Multivariate analyses of cellular fatty acids in Bacteroides, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Wolinella, and Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  I Brondz; I Olsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of Campylobacter concisus and other Campylobacter species in colonic biopsies from adults with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Indrani Mukhopadhya; John M Thomson; Richard Hansen; Susan H Berry; Emad M El-Omar; Georgina L Hold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identification of oxalotrophic bacteria by neural network analysis of numerical phenetic data.

Authors:  N Sahin; S Aydin
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Complete Genome Sequence of the Campylobacter ureolyticus Clinical Isolate RIGS 9880.

Authors:  William G Miller; Emma Yee; Stephen L W On; Leif P Andersen; James L Bono
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-11-05

9.  Presence of Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter ureolyticus in the oral cavity of a Northern Thailand population that experiences stomach pain.

Authors:  Amina Basic; Hanna Enerbäck; Sara Waldenström; Emma Östgärd; Narong Suksuart; Gunnar Dahlen
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.474

Review 10.  The Clinical Importance of Campylobacter concisus and Other Human Hosted Campylobacter Species.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Rena Ma; Yiming Wang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.