Libby J Smith1, Clark A Rosen2, Michael C Munin3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. smithlj2@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: As laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) becomes more refined, accurate predictions of vocal fold motion recovery are possible. Focus has been on outcomes for patients with poor prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery. Limited information is available regarding the expected rate of purposeful vocal fold motion recovery when there is good to normal motor recruitment, no signs of denervation, and no signs of synkinetic activity with LEMG, termed excellent prognosis. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of vocal fold motion recovery with excellent prognosis findings on LEMG after acute recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Patients undergoing a standardized LEMG protocol, consisting of qualitative (evaluation of motor recruitment, motor unit configuration, detection of fibrillations, presence of synkinesis) and quantitative (turns analysis) measurements were evaluated for purposeful vocal-fold motion recovery, calculated after at least 6 months since onset of injury. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients who underwent LEMG for acute vocal fold paralysis met the inclusion criteria of excellent prognosis. Eighteen patients (78.3%) recovered vocal fold motion, as determined by flexible laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 80% of patients determined to have excellent prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery experienced return of vocal fold motion. This information will help clinicians not only counsel their patients on expectations but will also help guide treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2310-2314, 2016.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: As laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) becomes more refined, accurate predictions of vocal fold motion recovery are possible. Focus has been on outcomes for patients with poor prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery. Limited information is available regarding the expected rate of purposeful vocal fold motion recovery when there is good to normal motor recruitment, no signs of denervation, and no signs of synkinetic activity with LEMG, termed excellent prognosis. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of vocal fold motion recovery with excellent prognosis findings on LEMG after acute recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS:Patients undergoing a standardized LEMG protocol, consisting of qualitative (evaluation of motor recruitment, motor unit configuration, detection of fibrillations, presence of synkinesis) and quantitative (turns analysis) measurements were evaluated for purposeful vocal-fold motion recovery, calculated after at least 6 months since onset of injury. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients who underwent LEMG for acute vocal fold paralysis met the inclusion criteria of excellent prognosis. Eighteen patients (78.3%) recovered vocal fold motion, as determined by flexible laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION: Nearly 80% of patients determined to have excellent prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery experienced return of vocal fold motion. This information will help clinicians not only counsel their patients on expectations but will also help guide treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2310-2314, 2016.
Authors: Vyas M N Prasad; Raja Fakhoury; Diane Helou; Georges Lawson; Marc Remacle Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 2.503