BACKGROUND: The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 global treatment target aims to achieve 73% virologic suppression among HIV-infected persons worldwide by 2020. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic value of reaching this ambitious goal in South Africa, by using a microsimulation model of HIV detection, disease, and treatment. DESIGN: Modeling of the "current pace" strategy, which simulates existing scale-up efforts and gradual increases in overall virologic suppression from 24% to 36% in 5 years, and the UNAIDS target strategy, which simulates 73% virologic suppression in 5 years. DATA SOURCES: Published estimates and South African survey data on HIV transmission rates (0.16 to 9.03 per 100 person-years), HIV-specific age-stratified fertility rates (1.0 to 9.1 per 100 person-years), and costs of care ($11 to $31 per month for antiretroviral therapy and $20 to $157 per month for routine care). TARGET POPULATION: South African HIV-infected population, including incident infections over the next 10 years. PERSPECTIVE: Modified societal perspective, excluding time and productivity costs. TIME HORIZON: 5 and 10 years. INTERVENTION: Aggressive HIV case detection, efficient linkage to care, rapid treatment scale-up, and adherence and retention interventions toward the UNAIDS target strategy. OUTCOME MEASURES: HIV transmissions, deaths, years of life saved, maternal orphans, costs (2014 U.S. dollars), and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the current pace strategy, over 5 years the UNAIDS target strategy would avert 873 000 HIV transmissions, 1 174 000 deaths, and 726 000 maternal orphans while saving 3 002 000 life-years; over 10 years, it would avert 2 051 000 HIV transmissions, 2 478 000 deaths, and 1 689 000 maternal orphans while saving 13 340 000 life-years. The additional budget required for the UNAIDS target strategy would be $7.965 billion over 5 years and $15.979 billion over 10 years, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2720 and $1260 per year of life saved, respectively. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Outcomes generally varied less than 20% from base-case outcomes when key input parameters were varied within plausible ranges. LIMITATION: Several pathways may lead to 73% overall virologic suppression; these were examined in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Reaching the 90-90-90 HIV suppression target would be costly but very effective and cost-effective in South Africa. Global health policymakers should mobilize the political and economic support to realize this target. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health and the Steve and Deborah Gorlin MGH Research Scholars Award.
BACKGROUND: The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 global treatment target aims to achieve 73% virologic suppression among HIV-infectedpersons worldwide by 2020. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical and economic value of reaching this ambitious goal in South Africa, by using a microsimulation model of HIV detection, disease, and treatment. DESIGN: Modeling of the "current pace" strategy, which simulates existing scale-up efforts and gradual increases in overall virologic suppression from 24% to 36% in 5 years, and the UNAIDS target strategy, which simulates 73% virologic suppression in 5 years. DATA SOURCES: Published estimates and South African survey data on HIV transmission rates (0.16 to 9.03 per 100 person-years), HIV-specific age-stratified fertility rates (1.0 to 9.1 per 100 person-years), and costs of care ($11 to $31 per month for antiretroviral therapy and $20 to $157 per month for routine care). TARGET POPULATION: South African HIV-infected population, including incident infections over the next 10 years. PERSPECTIVE: Modified societal perspective, excluding time and productivity costs. TIME HORIZON: 5 and 10 years. INTERVENTION: Aggressive HIV case detection, efficient linkage to care, rapid treatment scale-up, and adherence and retention interventions toward the UNAIDS target strategy. OUTCOME MEASURES: HIV transmissions, deaths, years of life saved, maternal orphans, costs (2014 U.S. dollars), and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the current pace strategy, over 5 years the UNAIDS target strategy would avert 873 000 HIV transmissions, 1 174 000 deaths, and 726 000 maternal orphans while saving 3 002 000 life-years; over 10 years, it would avert 2 051 000 HIV transmissions, 2 478 000 deaths, and 1 689 000 maternal orphans while saving 13 340 000 life-years. The additional budget required for the UNAIDS target strategy would be $7.965 billion over 5 years and $15.979 billion over 10 years, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2720 and $1260 per year of life saved, respectively. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Outcomes generally varied less than 20% from base-case outcomes when key input parameters were varied within plausible ranges. LIMITATION: Several pathways may lead to 73% overall virologic suppression; these were examined in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Reaching the 90-90-90 HIV suppression target would be costly but very effective and cost-effective in South Africa. Global health policymakers should mobilize the political and economic support to realize this target. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health and the Steve and Deborah Gorlin MGH Research Scholars Award.
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Eric L Ross; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Robin Wood; Farzad Noubary; A David Paltiel; Yoriko M Nakamura; Sheela V Godbole; Ravindre Panchia; Ian Sanne; Milton C Weinstein; Elena Losina; Kenneth H Mayer; Ying Q Chen; Lei Wang; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; George R Seage; Myron S Cohen; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter Piot; Salim S Abdool Karim; Robert Hecht; Helena Legido-Quigley; Kent Buse; John Stover; Stephen Resch; Theresa Ryckman; Sigrun Møgedal; Mark Dybul; Eric Goosby; Charlotte Watts; Nduku Kilonzo; Joanne McManus; Michel Sidibé Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Nelson K Sewankambo; David Serwadda; Xianbin Li; Oliver Laeyendecker; Noah Kiwanuka; Godfrey Kigozi; Mohammed Kiddugavu; Thomas Lutalo; Fred Nalugoda; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Mary P Meehan; Thomas C Quinn Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-03-30 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jens D Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Fred Gordin; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; Shweta Sharma; Anchalee Avihingsanon; David A Cooper; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Josep M Llibre; Jean-Michel Molina; Paula Munderi; Mauro Schechter; Robin Wood; Karin L Klingman; Simon Collins; H Clifford Lane; Andrew N Phillips; James D Neaton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer A Smith; Monisha Sharma; Carol Levin; Jared M Baeten; Heidi van Rooyen; Connie Celum; Timothy B Hallett; Ruanne V Barnabas Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Pooyan Kazemian; Sydney Costantini; Anne M Neilan; Stephen C Resch; Rochelle P Walensky; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Caitlin M Dugdale; Andrea L Ciaranello; Linda-Gail Bekker; Madeline E Stern; Landon Myer; Robin Wood; Paul E Sax; Elaine J Abrams; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jan Medlock; Abhishek Pandey; Alyssa S Parpia; Amber Tang; Laura A Skrip; Alison P Galvani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carolyn M Audet; Erin Graves; Ezequiel Barreto; Caroline De Schacht; Wu Gong; Bryan E Shepherd; Arifo Aboobacar; Lazaro Gonzalez-Calvo; Maria Fernanda Alvim; Muktar H Aliyu; Aaron M Kipp; Heather Jordan; K Rivet Amico; Matthew Diemer; Andrea Ciaranello; Caitlin Dugdale; Sten H Vermund; Sara Van Rompaey Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Pooyan Kazemian; Delaney D Ding; Justine A Scott; Mary K Feser; Katie Biello; Beena E Thomas; Alpana Dange; C Andres Bedoya; Vinoth Balu; Shruta Rawat; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Matthew J Mimiaga; Conall O'Cleirigh; Milton C Weinstein; Jacob Prem Kumar; Senthil Kumar; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: AIDS Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Linwei Wang; Jeong Eun Min; Xiao Zang; Paul Sereda; Richard P Harrigan; Julio S G Montaner; Bohdan Nosyk Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Maya Petersen; Laura Balzer; Dalsone Kwarsiima; Norton Sang; Gabriel Chamie; James Ayieko; Jane Kabami; Asiphas Owaraganise; Teri Liegler; Florence Mwangwa; Kevin Kadede; Vivek Jain; Albert Plenty; Lillian Brown; Geoff Lavoy; Joshua Schwab; Douglas Black; Mark van der Laan; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Tamara D Clark; Edwin Charlebois; Moses Kamya; Diane Havlir Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pooyan Kazemian; Sydney Costantini; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; A David Paltiel; Kenneth H Mayer; Nomita Chandhiok; Rochelle P Walensky; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Ethan D Borre; Linda-Gail Bekker; Emily P Hyle; Gregg S Gonsalves; Robin Wood; Serge P Eholié; Milton C Weinstein; Xavier Anglaret; Kenneth A Freedberg; A David Paltiel Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 51.598
Authors: Krishna P Reddy; Ankur Gupta-Wright; Katherine L Fielding; Sydney Costantini; Amy Zheng; Elizabeth L Corbett; Liyang Yu; Joep J van Oosterhout; Stephen C Resch; Douglas P Wilson; C Robert Horsburgh; Robin Wood; Melanie Alufandika-Moyo; Jurgens A Peters; Kenneth A Freedberg; Stephen D Lawn; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 26.763