Caitlin M Dugdale1, Andrea L Ciaranello1, Linda-Gail Bekker2, Madeline E Stern3, Landon Myer2, Robin Wood2, Paul E Sax4, Elaine J Abrams5, Kenneth A Freedberg1, Rochelle P Walensky6. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (C.M.D., A.L.C., K.A.F.). 2. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (L.B., L.M., R.W.). 3. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.E.S.). 4. Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (P.E.S.). 5. Columbia University, New York, New York (E.J.A.). 6. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (R.P.W.).
Abstract
Background: Dolutegravir is superior to efavirenz for HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) but may be associated with an increased risk for neural tube defects (NTDs) in newborns if used by women at conception. Objective: To project clinical outcomes of ART policies for women of child-bearing potential in South Africa. Design: Model of 3 strategies: efavirenz for all women of child-bearing potential (EFV), dolutegravir for all women of child-bearing potential (DTG), or World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended efavirenz without contraception or dolutegravir with contraception (WHO approach). Data Sources: Published data on NTD risks (efavirenz, 0.05%; dolutegravir, 0.67% [Tsepamo study]), 48-week ART efficacy with initiation (efavirenz, 60% to 91%; dolutegravir, 96%), and age-stratified fertility rates (2 to 139 per 1000 women). Target Population: 3.1 million South African women with HIV (aged 15 to 49 years) starting or continuing first-line ART, and their children. Time Horizon: 5 years. Perspective: Societal. Intervention: EFV, DTG, and WHO approach. Outcome Measures: Deaths among women and children, sexual and pediatric HIV transmissions, and NTDs. Results of Base-Case Analysis: Compared with EFV, DTG averted 13 700 women's deaths (0.44% decrease) and 57 700 sexual HIV transmissions, but increased total pediatric deaths by 4400 because of more NTDs. The WHO approach offered some benefits compared with EFV, averting 4900 women's deaths and 20 500 sexual transmissions while adding 300 pediatric deaths. Overall, combined deaths among women and children were lowest with DTG (358 000 deaths) compared with the WHO approach (362 800 deaths) or EFV (367 300 deaths). Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Women's deaths averted with DTG exceeded pediatric deaths added with EFV unless dolutegravir-associated NTD risk was 1.5% or greater. Limitation: Uncertainty in NTD risks and dolutegravir efficacy in resource-limited settings, each examined in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Although NTD risks may be higher with dolutegravir than efavirenz, dolutegravir will lead to many fewer deaths among women, as well as fewer overall HIV transmissions. These results argue against a uniform policy of avoiding dolutegravir in women of child-bearing potential. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Massachusetts General Hospital; and Harvard University Center for AIDS Research.
Background: Dolutegravir is superior to efavirenz for HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) but may be associated with an increased risk for neural tube defects (NTDs) in newborns if used by women at conception. Objective: To project clinical outcomes of ART policies for women of child-bearing potential in South Africa. Design: Model of 3 strategies: efavirenz for all women of child-bearing potential (EFV), dolutegravir for all women of child-bearing potential (DTG), or World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended efavirenz without contraception or dolutegravir with contraception (WHO approach). Data Sources: Published data on NTD risks (efavirenz, 0.05%; dolutegravir, 0.67% [Tsepamo study]), 48-week ART efficacy with initiation (efavirenz, 60% to 91%; dolutegravir, 96%), and age-stratified fertility rates (2 to 139 per 1000 women). Target Population: 3.1 million South African women with HIV (aged 15 to 49 years) starting or continuing first-line ART, and their children. Time Horizon: 5 years. Perspective: Societal. Intervention: EFV, DTG, and WHO approach. Outcome Measures: Deaths among women and children, sexual and pediatric HIV transmissions, and NTDs. Results of Base-Case Analysis: Compared with EFV, DTG averted 13 700 women's deaths (0.44% decrease) and 57 700 sexual HIV transmissions, but increased total pediatric deaths by 4400 because of moreNTDs. The WHO approach offered some benefits compared with EFV, averting 4900 women's deaths and 20 500 sexual transmissions while adding 300 pediatric deaths. Overall, combined deaths among women and children were lowest with DTG (358 000 deaths) compared with the WHO approach (362 800 deaths) or EFV (367 300 deaths). Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Women's deaths averted with DTG exceeded pediatric deaths added with EFV unless dolutegravir-associated NTD risk was 1.5% or greater. Limitation: Uncertainty in NTD risks and dolutegravir efficacy in resource-limited settings, each examined in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Although NTD risks may be higher with dolutegravir than efavirenz, dolutegravir will lead to many fewer deaths among women, as well as fewer overall HIV transmissions. These results argue against a uniform policy of avoiding dolutegravir in women of child-bearing potential. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Massachusetts General Hospital; and Harvard University Center for AIDSResearch.
Authors: Suzanne M McCluskey; Yap Boum; Nicholas Musinguzi; Jessica E Haberer; Jeffrey N Martin; Peter W Hunt; Vincent C Marconi; David R Bangsberg; Mark J Siedner Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Claire L Townsend; Laura Byrne; Mario Cortina-Borja; Claire Thorne; Annemiek de Ruiter; Hermione Lyall; Graham P Taylor; Catherine S Peckham; Pat A Tookey Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Catherine Orrell; Debbie P Hagins; Elena Belonosova; Norma Porteiro; Sharon Walmsley; Vicenç Falcó; Choy Y Man; Alicia Aylott; Ann M Buchanan; Brian Wynne; Cindy Vavro; Michael Aboud; Kimberly Y Smith Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Jeffrey L Lennox; Edwin DeJesus; Adriano Lazzarin; Richard B Pollard; Jose Valdez Ramalho Madruga; Daniel S Berger; Jing Zhao; Xia Xu; Angela Williams-Diaz; Anthony J Rodgers; Richard J O Barnard; Michael D Miller; Mark J DiNubile; Bach-Yen Nguyen; Randi Leavitt; Peter Sklar Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher J Hoffmann; Salome Charalambous; John Sim; Joanna Ledwaba; Graham Schwikkard; Richard E Chaisson; Katherine L Fielding; Gavin J Churchyard; Lynn Morris; Alison D Grant Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Samantha R Kaplan; Christa Oosthuizen; Kathryn Stinson; Francesca Little; Jonathan Euvrard; Michael Schomaker; Meg Osler; Katherine Hilderbrand; Andrew Boulle; Graeme Meintjes Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jacob Bor; Shahira Ahmed; Matthew P Fox; Sydney Rosen; Gesine Meyer-Rath; Ingrid T Katz; Frank Tanser; Deenan Pillay; Till Bärnighausen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Françoise Renaud; Lynne M Mofenson; Charlotte Bakker; Helen Dolk; Valeriane Leroy; Angelina Namiba; Leyla Sahin; Roger Shapiro; Amy Slogrove; Claire Thorne; Marissa Vicari; Daniel Low-Beer; Meg Doherty Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 6.707
Authors: Matthew L Romo; Rena C Patel; Jessie K Edwards; John M Humphrey; Beverly S Musick; Caitlin Bernard; Mercy W Maina; Ellen Brazier; Barbara Castelnuovo; Jeremy Penner; Katarzyna Wyka; Sandra Wagner Cardoso; Penh Sun Ly; Cordelia Kunzekwenyika; Claudia P Cortés; Radoslaw Panczak; Elizabeth A Kelvin; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Denis Nash Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 51.598
Authors: Paige L Williams; Cenk Yildirim; Ellen G Chadwick; Russell B Van Dyke; Renee Smith; Katharine F Correia; Alexandria DiPerna; George R Seage; Rohan Hazra; Claudia S Crowell Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Rebecca Zash; Lewis Holmes; Modiegi Diseko; Denise L Jacobson; Sean Brummel; Gloria Mayondi; Arielle Isaacson; Sonya Davey; Judith Mabuta; Mompati Mmalane; Tendani Gaolathe; M Essex; Shahin Lockman; Joseph Makhema; Roger L Shapiro Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Krishna P Reddy; Alexander J B Bulteel; Douglas E Levy; Pamela Torola; Emily P Hyle; Taige Hou; Benjamin Osher; Liyang Yu; Fatma M Shebl; A David Paltiel; Kenneth A Freedberg; Milton C Weinstein; Nancy A Rigotti; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Horacio A Duarte; Joseph B Babigumira; Eva A Enns; David C Stauffer; Robert W Shafer; Ingrid A Beck; Louis P Garrison; Michael H Chung; Lisa M Frenkel; Eran Bendavid Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-05-22