| Literature DB >> 27239229 |
Tewodros Debebe1, Susanne Holtze2, Michaela Morhart2, Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt2, Steffen Rodewald3, Klaus Huse4, Matthias Platzer4, Dereje Wyohannes5, Salomon Yirga5, Alemayehu Lemma6, Rene Thieme7, Brigitte König8, Gerd Birkenmeier9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A variety of microbial communities exist throughout the human and animal body. Genetics, environmental factors and long-term dietary habit contribute to shaping the composition of the gut microbiota. For this reason the study of the gut microbiota of a mammal exhibiting an extraordinary life span is of great importance. The naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) is a eusocial mammal known for its longevity and cancer resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Diet; Microbiota; Naked mole-rat; Polyphenols
Year: 2016 PMID: 27239229 PMCID: PMC4884373 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-016-0107-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Pathog ISSN: 1757-4749 Impact factor: 4.181
Distribution of the identified microbiota from the wild naked mole-rats (n = 11)
| Sites | Species | Phylum | (c.f.u./g) in range | Charactersticsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon |
| Firmicutes | 1 × 102–103 | Normal flora |
|
| Firmicutes | 1–2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2 × 102–3 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 0.2–1 × 104 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2–3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1–2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1–4 × 105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 5 × 105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Proteobacteria | 3 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Proteobacteria | 2 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Proteobacteria | 5 × 103–105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Actinobacteria | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
| Cecum |
| Firmicutes | 2–4 × 103 | Normal flora |
|
| Firmicutes | 0.4–1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 0.1–1 × 104 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 4 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 0.1–1.2 × 104 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 0.2–1 × 105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1 × 105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Proteobacteria | 0.7–2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Actinobacteria | 1 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Actinobacteria | 1 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Ascomycota | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
| Feces |
| Firmicutes | 1 × 102 | Normal flora |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 0.2–3 × 105 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 2 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1–2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Firmicutes | 1 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 3 × 102 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 2 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1 × 103 | Normal flora | |
|
| Bacteroidetes | 1–3 × 103 | Normal flora |
a Sources: [15–19]
Frequency of microbes in colon, cecum and feces of the naked mole-rats
| Species | Number of positive isolates (% isolation frequency) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon (n = 10) | Cecum (n = 11) | Feces (n = 10) | Total | |
|
| 5 (50) | 5 (45.5) | 4 (40) | 14 (45.2) |
|
| 2 (20) | 1 (9.1) | 2 (20) | 5 (16.1) |
|
| 2 (20) | 3 (27.3) | 1 (10) | 6 (19.4) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 2 (20) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 4 (12.9) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (10) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 3 (30) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 5 (16.1) |
|
| 2 (20) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 3 (9.7) |
|
| 2 (20) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 4 (12.9) |
|
| 1 (10) | 2 (18.2) | 2 (20) | 5 (16.1) |
|
| 1 (10) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 2 (20) | 3 (9.7) |
|
| 1 (10) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 1 (10) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 2 (6.5) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 1 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) |
Fig. 1Stimulation of inflammatory cytokines by naked mole-rat microbes. Heparinized blood from healthy volunteers was stimulated by medium alone (negative control), LPS (positive control), S. sciuri, B. megaterium, P. distasonis, C. ramosum, B. ovatus and two human pathobionts E. coli and S. aureus at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 for 8 h. The levels of the cytokines IL-1β (a), TNF-α (b), IL-6 (c) were measured by cytometric bead array assays. The experiment was done in triplicates and data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; #strong hemolysis