Literature DB >> 27235882

Current utilities of imaging in grading musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcomas.

Stephen M Fisher1, Robert Joodi2, Ananth J Madhuranthakam2, Orhan K Öz2, Rohit Sharma3, Avneesh Chhabra4.   

Abstract

The care of patients with musculoskeletal malignancies has increasingly become a multidisciplinary function. Radiologists play an important role in many areas of these patients' care including initial diagnosis, staging, in many cases guiding therapy, and monitoring treatment response. However, the gold standard for the final diagnosis of these diseases remains the histopathologic proof. Intense efforts have been made to develop non-invasive methods of determining the tumor grade, or a surrogate, in order to predict biologic behavior, aid early treatment decisions, and provide prognostic information. Multiple imaging modalities have been employed in this domain-including computed tomography (CT); anatomic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques; functional MR imaging sequences such as dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS); and positron emission tomography (PET). This article reviews current available literature in this realm and highlights future directions towards the potential of non-invasive imaging in grading of soft tissue sarcomas.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Grading; MRI; PET; Sarcoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235882     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced 3T MR Perfusion of Musculoskeletal Tumours: T1 Value Heterogeneity Assessment and Evaluation of the Influence of T1 Estimation Methods on Quantitative Parameters.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Christophe Leplat; Bailiang Chen; Jacques De Verbizier; Marine Beaumont; Sammy Badr; Anne Cotten; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI features of myxoid liposarcomas and intramuscular myxomas.

Authors:  Brendan W Lunn; Laurel A Littrell; Doris E Wenger; Stephen M Broski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Preclinical PET tracers for the evaluation of sarcomas: understanding tumor biology.

Authors:  Ian R Sigal; Ronnie Sebro
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-20

4.  Diagnostic Performance of US and MRI in Predicting Malignancy of Soft Tissue Masses: Using a Scoring System.

Authors:  Hua Shu; Qian Ma; Ao Li; Pingping Wang; Yingqian Gao; Qiyu Yao; Yu Hu; Xinhua Ye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  Applications of PET-MRI in musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  Feliks Kogan; Stephen M Broski; Daehyun Yoon; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  What morphological MRI features enable differentiation of low-grade from high-grade soft tissue sarcoma?

Authors:  Sana Boudabbous; Marion Hamard; Essia Saiji; Karel Gorican; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Minerva Becker; Angeliki Neroladaki
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.