Literature DB >> 27235673

Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training.

Janne Cadamuro, Alexander von Meyer, Helmut Wiedemann, Thomas Klaus Felder, Franziska Moser, Ulrike Kipman, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher, Cornelia Mrazek, Ana-Maria Simundic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic samples are one of the most challenging preanalytical issues in laboratory medicine. Even causes leading to hemolytic specimen are various, including phlebotomy practices. Respective educational interventions as well as the reduction of the number of people involved in blood collections are claimed to influence the sample quality for the better. In our hospital 70 junior doctors were in charge of routine phlebotomy until 2012, when this task was shifted to 874 nurses, including a preceding training in phlebotomy and preanalytics. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of this training effect and the increase of people involved on sample quality.
METHODS: The hemolysis index (HI) of 43,875 samples was measured before (n=21,512) and after (n=22,363) the switch of blood collection responsibilities. Differences in overall hemolysis rates and the amount of plasma samples with a concentration of free hemoglobin (fHb) above 0.5 g/L and 1 g/L were calculated.
RESULTS: Overall HI as well as the percentage of samples with an fHb concentration >0.5 g/L decreased after the responsibility for phlebotomy changed. The rate of samples with an fHb concentration >1 g/L remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemolysis rates were reduced upon passing phlebotomy tasks from untrained physicians on to a trained nursing staff. We therefore conclude that the number of people performing phlebotomy seems to play a minor role, compared to the effect of a standardized training. However, whether a reduction in the number of people involved in blood collection could lead to further improvement of sample quality, remains to be investigated in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235673     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  The results of a close follow-up of trainees to gain a good blood collection practice.

Authors:  Güzin Aykal; Hatice Esen; Ayşenur Yeğin; Cemile Öz
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 2: Practices of European laboratories on monitoring and processing haemolytic, icteric and lipemic samples. On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Giuseppe Lippi; Alexander von Meyer; Mercedes Ibarz; Edmee van Dongen; Michael Cornes; Mads Nybo; Pieter Vermeersch; Kjell Grankvist; Joao Tiago Guimaraes; Gunn B B Kristensen; Barbara de la Salle; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Rejection of hemolyzed samples can jeopardize patient safety.

Authors:  Lorenzo Barbato; Marise Danielle Campelo; Sara Pigozzo; Nicola Realdon; Anna Gandini; Roberto Barbazza; Mayara Ladeira Coêlho; Chiara Bovo; Paola Marini; Gabriel Lima-Oliveira
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-03-20

4.  Quality improvement project: Reducing non-conformities of the samples for haemostasis testing in a secondary healthcare centre through the nurses' education in phlebotomy.

Authors:  Patricija Banković Radovanović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  Guidelines for pre-analytical conditions for assessing the methylation of circulating cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Kerachian; Marjan Azghandi; Sina Mozaffari-Jovin; Alain R Thierry
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  Hemolytic specimens in complete blood cell count: Red cell parameters could be revised by plasma free hemoglobin.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Peng; Wenqing Xiang; Jianming Zhou; Jiajia Cao; Zhe Li; Hui Gao; Junfeng Zhang; Hongqiang Shen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.