E X Georgiou1, K Lei2, P F Lai3, A Yulia1, B R Herbert3, M Castellanos4, S T May4, S R Sooranna1, M R Johnson5. 1. Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. 2. Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. 3. Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK. 4. Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Plant Science Building, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK. 5. Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK mark.johnson@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Myometrial explants represent a superior model compared with cell culture models for the study of human myometrial progesterone (P4) signalling in parturition. STUDY FINDING: Gene expression analysis showed myometrial explants closely resemble the in vivo condition and the anti-inflammatory action of P4 is not lost with labour onset. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Circulating P4 levels decline before the onset of parturition in most animals, but not in humans. This has led to the suggestion that there is a functional withdrawal of P4 action at the myometrial level prior to labour onset. However, to date, no evidence of a loss of P4 function has been provided, with studies hampered by a lack of a physiologically relevant model. STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLES/MATERIALS, METHODS: Myometrial biopsies obtained at Caesarean section were dissected into explants after a portion was immediately snap frozen (t = 0). Microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression of t = 0 with paired (i) explants, (ii) passage 4 myometrial cell cultures or (iii) the hTERT myometrial cell line. Western blotting and chemokine/cytokine assays were used to study P4 signalling in myometrial explants. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Gene expression comparison of t = 0 to the three models demonstrated that explants more closely resemble the in vivo status. At the protein level, explants maintain both P4 receptor (PR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels versus t = 0 whereas cells only maintain GR levels. Additionally, treatment with 1 µM P4 led to a reduction in interleukin-1 (IL-1) β-driven cyclooxygenase-2 in explants but not in cells. P4 signalling in explants was PR-mediated and associated with a repression of p65 and c-Jun phosphorylation. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory action of P4 was maintained after labour onset. LIMITATIONS/REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is evidence of basal inflammation in the myometrial explant model. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Myometrial explants constitute a novel model to study P4 signalling in the myometrium and can be used to further elucidate the mechanisms of P4 action in human labour. LARGE SCALE DATA: Data deposited at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=gvmpggkurbgxfqf&acc=GSE77830. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by grants from the Joint Research Committee of the Westminster Medical School Research Trust, Borne (No. 1067412-7; a sub-charity of the Chelsea and Westminster Health Charity) and the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS or the Department of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Myometrial explants represent a superior model compared with cell culture models for the study of human myometrial progesterone (P4) signalling in parturition. STUDY FINDING: Gene expression analysis showed myometrial explants closely resemble the in vivo condition and the anti-inflammatory action of P4 is not lost with labour onset. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Circulating P4 levels decline before the onset of parturition in most animals, but not in humans. This has led to the suggestion that there is a functional withdrawal of P4 action at the myometrial level prior to labour onset. However, to date, no evidence of a loss of P4 function has been provided, with studies hampered by a lack of a physiologically relevant model. STUDY DESIGN, SAMPLES/MATERIALS, METHODS: Myometrial biopsies obtained at Caesarean section were dissected into explants after a portion was immediately snap frozen (t = 0). Microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression of t = 0 with paired (i) explants, (ii) passage 4 myometrial cell cultures or (iii) the hTERT myometrial cell line. Western blotting and chemokine/cytokine assays were used to study P4 signalling in myometrial explants. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Gene expression comparison of t = 0 to the three models demonstrated that explants more closely resemble the in vivo status. At the protein level, explants maintain both P4 receptor (PR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels versus t = 0 whereas cells only maintain GR levels. Additionally, treatment with 1 µM P4 led to a reduction in interleukin-1 (IL-1) β-driven cyclooxygenase-2 in explants but not in cells. P4 signalling in explants was PR-mediated and associated with a repression of p65 and c-Jun phosphorylation. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory action of P4 was maintained after labour onset. LIMITATIONS/REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is evidence of basal inflammation in the myometrial explant model. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Myometrial explants constitute a novel model to study P4 signalling in the myometrium and can be used to further elucidate the mechanisms of P4 action in human labour. LARGE SCALE DATA: Data deposited at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=gvmpggkurbgxfqf&acc=GSE77830. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by grants from the Joint Research Committee of the Westminster Medical School Research Trust, Borne (No. 1067412-7; a sub-charity of the Chelsea and Westminster Health Charity) and the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS or the Department of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest.
Authors: Pooja Mittal; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca; Juan Gonzalez; Sorin Draghici; Yi Xu; Zhong Dong; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Stephen Lye; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Leonard Lipovich; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Sonia S Hassan; Sam Mesiano; Chong Jai Kim Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Sam Mesiano; Eng-Cheng Chan; John T Fitter; Kenneth Kwek; George Yeo; Roger Smith Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Yun Lee; Suren R Sooranna; Vasso Terzidou; Mark Christian; Jan Brosens; Kaisa Huhtinen; Matti Poutanen; Geraint Barton; Mark R Johnson; Phillip R Bennett Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Andrea A Mosher; Kelly J Rainey; Seunghwa S Bolstad; Stephen J Lye; Bryan F Mitchell; David M Olson; Stephen L Wood; Donna M Slater Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Kelycia B Leimert; Barbara S E Verstraeten; Angela Messer; Rojin Nemati; Kayla Blackadar; Xin Fang; Sarah A Robertson; Sylvain Chemtob; David M Olson Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Angela Yulia; Alice J Varley; Natasha Singh; Kaiyu Lei; Rachel M Tribe; Mark R Johnson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.240