Literature DB >> 27233113

DNA damage processing at telomeres: The ends justify the means.

Elise Fouquerel1, Dhvani Parikh1, Patricia Opresko2.   

Abstract

Telomeres at chromosome ends are nucleoprotein structures consisting of tandem TTAGGG repeats and a complex of proteins termed shelterin. DNA damage and repair at telomeres is uniquely influenced by the ability of telomeric DNA to form alternate structures including loops and G-quadruplexes, coupled with the ability of shelterin proteins to interact with and regulate enzymes in every known DNA repair pathway. The role of shelterin proteins in preventing telomeric ends from being falsely recognized and processed as DNA double strand breaks is well established. Here we focus instead on recent developments in understanding the roles of shelterin proteins and telomeric DNA sequence and structure in processing genuine damage at telomeres induced by endogenous and exogenous DNA damage agents. We will highlight advances in double strand break repair, base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair at telomeres, and will discuss important questions remaining in the field.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Base excision repair; DNA damage; DNA repair; Double strand break repair; G-quadruplex; Nucleotide excision repair; Shelterin proteins; Telomeres

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27233113     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  15 in total

1.  Measuring UV Photoproduct Repair in Isolated Telomeres and Bulk Genomic DNA.

Authors:  Elise Fouquerel; Ryan P Barnes; Hong Wang; Patricia L Opresko
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 2.  In What Ways Do Synthetic Nucleotides and Natural Base Lesions Alter the Structural Stability of G-Quadruplex Nucleic Acids?

Authors:  Janos Sagi
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-10-18

3.  Tissue-specific telomere dynamics in hibernating arctic ground squirrels (Urocitellus parryii).

Authors:  Sara M Wilbur; Brian M Barnes; Alexander S Kitaysky; Cory T Williams
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Convergence of The Nobel Fields of Telomere Biology and DNA Repair.

Authors:  Elise Fouquerel; Patricia L Opresko
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Mammalian MutY Homolog (MYH or MUTYH) is Critical for Telomere Integrity under Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Aditi Gupta; Bor-Jang Hwang; Daniel Benyamien-Roufaeil; Sara Jain; Sophie Liu; Rex Gonzales; Robert A Brown; Michal Zalzman; A-Lien Lu
Journal:  OBM Geriat       Date:  2022-04-02

6.  A hypomorphic allele of telomerase uncovers the minimal functional length of telomeres in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J Matthew Watson; Johanna Trieb; Martina Troestl; Kyle Renfrew; Terezie Mandakova; Jaroslav Fulnecek; Dorothy E Shippen; Karel Riha
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  NEIL3 Repairs Telomere Damage during S Phase to Secure Chromosome Segregation at Mitosis.

Authors:  Jia Zhou; Jany Chan; Marie Lambelé; Timur Yusufzai; Jason Stumpff; Patricia L Opresko; Markus Thali; Susan S Wallace
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Chromosomally Integrated Human Herpesvirus 6: Models of Viral Genome Release from the Telomere and Impacts on Human Health.

Authors:  Michael L Wood; Nicola J Royle
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  Base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage: from mechanism to disease.

Authors:  Amy M Whitaker; Matthew A Schaich; Mallory R Smith; Tony S Flynn; Bret D Freudenthal
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2017-03-01

10.  Molecular mechanisms by which oxidative DNA damage promotes telomerase activity.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Lee; Arindam Bose; Chun-Ying Lee; Patricia L Opresko; Sua Myong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.