| Literature DB >> 27233085 |
M G Hartwig1, A M Ganapathi2, A A Osho2, S A Hirji2, B R Englum2, P J Speicher2, S M Palmer3, R D Davis2, L D Snyder3.
Abstract
The choice of a single or bilateral lung transplant for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is controversial, as surgical risk, long-term survival and organ allocation are competing factors. In an effort to balance risk and benefit, our center adopted a staged bilateral lung transplant approach for higher surgical risk ILD patients where the patient has a single lung transplant followed by a second single transplant at a later date. We sought to understand the surgical risk, organ allocation and early outcomes of these staged bilateral recipients as a group and in comparison to matched single and bilateral recipients. Our analysis demonstrates that staged bilateral lung transplant recipients (n = 12) have a higher lung allocation score (LAS), lower pulmonary function tests and a lower glomerular filtration rate prior to the first transplant compared to the second (p < 0.01). There was a shorter length of hospital stay for the second transplant (p = 0.02). The staged bilateral compared to the single and bilateral case-matched controls had comparable short-term survival (p = 0.20) and pulmonary function tests at 1 year. There was a higher incidence of renal injury in the conventional bilateral group compared to the single and staged bilateral groups. The staged bilateral procedure is a viable option in select ILD patients. © Copyright 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research/practice; lung transplantation/pulmonology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; waitlist management
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27233085 PMCID: PMC5083210 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086