Literature DB >> 27232969

Potential of temperate agricultural soils for carbon sequestration: A meta-analysis of land-use effects.

Immo Kämpf1, Norbert Hölzel2, Maria Störrle3, Gabriele Broll3, Kathrin Kiehl4.   

Abstract

Restoring depleted soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of arable land to remove carbon from the atmosphere and offset fossil fuel emissions is a promising strategy for the mitigation of climate change. In agroecosystems conservational tillage practices and the abandonment of formerly plowed fields (ex-arable land) are shown to have the highest potential to sequester SOC. Nevertheless reported sequestration rates vary and the effects of environmental site conditions remain poorly understood. Our results are based on a meta-analysis of 273 paired SOC estimates from 65 publications which included only mineral soils from the temperate zone. SOC stocks of ex-arable grasslands with an average of 14years since abandonment were 18% larger compared to the SOC of arable land. Likewise, SOC stocks of never-plowed grassland plots were 11% larger than the SOC stocks of abandoned fields. The average sequestration rate was 0.72t Cha(-1)yr(-1). Semi-arid and sub-humid climate as well as low initial SOC stocks positively affected proportional SOC gains suggesting that the recovery of carbon stocks is not limited by low primary production. Therefore, the northward shift of cultivation areas in the temperate zone will lead to the abandonment of soils with high SOC recovery potential. However, if native soils are opened up elsewhere to compensate for yield losses due to abandonment the surplus of SOC in ex-arable land can easily be overcompensated by cultivation losses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural abandonment; Carbon sequestration; Ex-arable; Grassland restoration; No-till farming; SOC

Year:  2016        PMID: 27232969     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Monitoring the Impact of Hedgerows and Grass Strips on the Performance of Multiple Ecosystem Service Indicators.

Authors:  Laura Van Vooren; Bert Reubens; Evy Ampoorter; Steven Broekx; Paul Pardon; Chris Van Waes; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Microbial technology with major potentials for the urgent environmental needs of the next decades.

Authors:  Willy Verstraete; Jo De Vrieze
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Natural climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Fargione; Steven Bassett; Timothy Boucher; Scott D Bridgham; Richard T Conant; Susan C Cook-Patton; Peter W Ellis; Alessandra Falcucci; James W Fourqurean; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Huan Gu; Benjamin Henderson; Matthew D Hurteau; Kevin D Kroeger; Timm Kroeger; Tyler J Lark; Sara M Leavitt; Guy Lomax; Robert I McDonald; J Patrick Megonigal; Daniela A Miteva; Curtis J Richardson; Jonathan Sanderman; David Shoch; Seth A Spawn; Joseph W Veldman; Christopher A Williams; Peter B Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Marci Baranski; Patricia Elias; Richard A Houghton; Emily Landis; Emily McGlynn; William H Schlesinger; Juha V Siikamaki; Ariana E Sutton-Grier; Bronson W Griscom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding Our Viewpoint "Sequestering Soil Organic Carbon: A Nitrogen Dilemma".

Authors:  Jan Willem Van Groenigen; Chris Van Kessel; Bruce A Hungate; Oene Oenema; David S Powlson; Kees Jan Van Groenigen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Properties of humic acids depending on the land use in different parts of Slovakia.

Authors:  Magdalena Banach-Szott; Bozena Debska; Erika Tobiasova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.