| Literature DB >> 34100209 |
Magdalena Banach-Szott1, Bozena Debska2, Erika Tobiasova3.
Abstract
Many studies report organic carbon stabilization by clay minerals, but the effects of land use and soil type on the properties of humic acids (HAs) are missing. The aim of the paper is to determine the effects of land use and soil types on the characteristics of HAs, which have a considerable influence on organic matter quality. It was hypothesised that the effect of the land use on HAs properties depends on the particular size distribution. The research was performed in three ecosystems: agricultural, forest, and meadow, located in Slovakia. From each of them, the samples of 4 soil types were taken: Chernozem, Luvisol, Planosol, and Cambisol. The soil samples were assayed for the content of total organic carbon (TOC) and the particle size distribution. HAs were extracted with the Schnitzer method and analysed for the elemental composition, spectrometric parameters in the UV-VIS range, and hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties, and the infrared spectra were produced. The research results have shown that the properties of HAs can be modified by the land use and the scope and that the direction of changes depends on the soil type. The HAs of Chernozem and Luvisol in the agri-ecosystem were identified with a higher "degree of maturity", as reflected by atomic ratios (H/C, O/C, O/H), absorbance coefficients, and the FT-IR spectra, as compared with the HAs of the meadow and forest ecosystem. However, as for the HAs of Cambisol, a higher "degree of maturity" was demonstrated for the meadow ecosystem, as compared with the HAs of the agri- and forest ecosystem. The present research has clearly identified that the content of clay is the factor determining the HAs properties. Soils with a higher content of the clay fraction contain HAs with a higher "degree of maturity".Entities:
Keywords: Elemental composition; HPLC; Soils; UV-VIS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34100209 PMCID: PMC8536593 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14616-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Soil sampling locations: 1 – Voderady, 2 – Vavrecka, 3 – Prietrz, 4 – Plave Vozokany
The crop rotations for soils
| Soils | Vegetation | Soils | Vegetation |
|---|---|---|---|
Basic characteristics of soil samples (mean values and standard deviation)
| Soils | Ecosystems | Sand | Silt | Clay | pH/KCl | TOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (g kg−1) | |||||
| Ch1 | AE | 29.8±2.02 | 40.4±1.1 | 29.8±2.0 | 7.28 | 17.9±1.7 |
| FE | 38.3±1.0 | 33.0±1.9 | 28.7±1.0 | 7.52 | 29.6±1.1 | |
| ME | 36.7±0.9 | 36.3±0.6 | 27.0±1.1 | 7.57 | 29.1±1.0 | |
| Mean | 34.9 | 36.6 | 28.5 | 25.5 | ||
| Lu | AE | 13.2±0.8 | 58.0±0.8 | 28.8±0.3 | 5.85 | 14.8±1.9 |
| FE | 19.1±0.9 | 52.1±1.8 | 28.8±2.3 | 5.05 | 30.1±0.9 | |
| ME | 14.5±1.0 | 51.5±1.1 | 34.0±2.1 | 6.56 | 18.9±0.6 | |
| Mean | 15.6 | 53.9 | 30.5 | 21.3 | ||
| Pl | AE | 63.9±0.7 | 14.0±0.7 | 22.1±0.3 | 5.97 | 20.9±1.9 |
| FE | 45.9±1.1 | 37.8±0.3 | 16.3±1.1 | 5.01 | 36.9±0.3 | |
| ME | 60.4±0.8 | 17.9±2.2 | 21.7±1.4 | 6.01 | 22.5±1.0 | |
| Mean | 56.7 | 23.2 | 20.0 | 26.8 | ||
| Ca | AE | 34.9±0.6 | 44.3±1.0 | 20.8±1.2 | 7.08 | 13.0±1.0 |
| FE | 17.0±1.0 | 58.0±1.3 | 25.0±1.0 | 6.37 | 16.7±0.4 | |
| ME | 17.1±0.6 | 55.1±0.9 | 27.8±1.5 | 5.93 | 11.6±0.7 | |
| Mean | 23.0 | 52.5 | 24.5 | 13.8 | ||
1Ch Chernozem, Lu Luvisol, Pl Planosol, Ca Cambisol, AE agricultural ecosystem, FE forest ecosystem, ME meadow ecosystem, TOC total organic carbon
2Standard deviation (n=3)
Mean values of elemental composition with standard deviation and atomic ratio of humic acids
| Soils | Ecosystems | C | H | N | O | H/C | N/C | O/C | O/H | ω4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [% atomic] | ||||||||||
| Ch1 | AE | 38.93±0.293 | 35.57±0.38 | 2.71±0.04 | 22.80±0.18 | 0.91b2 | 0.070c | 0.586a | 0.641a | 0.466a |
| FE | 34.57±0.06 | 43.13±0.10 | 4.21±0.03 | 18.10±0.05 | 1.25a | 0.122a | 0.524c | 0.420c | 0.164c | |
| ME | 35.97±0.13 | 40.27±0.26 | 3.79±0.09 | 19.96±0.19 | 1.12a | 0.105b | 0.555b | 0.496b | 0.307b | |
| Lu | AE | 37.74±0.06 | 38.21±0.21 | 2.67±0.19 | 21.37±0.30 | 1.01a | 0.071a | 0.566a | 0.559a | 0.333a |
| FE | 39.55±0.68 | 37.23±0.92 | 2.92±0.07 | 20.30±0.61 | 0.94ab | 0.074a | 0.513c | 0.545ab | 0.307b | |
| ME | 37.71±0.64 | 38.73±0.19 | 2.90±0.05 | 20.66±0.85 | 1.03a | 0.077a | 0.548b | 0.533b | 0.300b | |
| Pl | AE | 33.81±0.27 | 43.81±0.69 | 2.76±0.08 | 19.62±0.33 | 1.30a | 0.082a | 0.580b | 0.448c | 0.110c |
| FE | 33.38±0.43 | 43.65±0.35 | 2.55±0.13 | 20.42±0.56 | 1.31a | 0.076b | 0.612a | 0.468b | 0.145b | |
| ME | 34.31±0.25 | 41.59±0.43 | 2.93±0.08 | 21.17±0.12 | 1.21ab | 0.085a | 0.617a | 0.509a | 0.278a | |
| Ca | AE | 34.09±0.75 | 43.63±0.75 | 3.77±0.14 | 18.52±0.21 | 1.28a | 0.111a | 0.543ab | 0.424c | 0.138c |
| FE | 35.40±0.51 | 41.77±0.12 | 3.26±0.12 | 19.59±0.24 | 1.18ab | 0.092b | 0.554a | 0.469b | 0.203b | |
| ME | 36.60±0.78 | 40.2±0.72 | 3.15±0.05 | 20.10±0.85 | 1.10b | 0.086b | 0.551a | 0.502a | 0.262a | |
1Ch Chernozem, Lu Luvisol, Pl Planosol, Ca Cambisol, AE agricultural ecosystem, FE forest ecosystem, ME meadow ecosystem
2Values followed by a lowercase letter are not significantly different at 5%
3Standard deviation (n=3)
4ω - internal oxidation degree
Fig. 2Relationship between the H/C atomic ratio values and parameter ω, where H, C – content in atomic %, ω – internal oxidation degree, AE – agri-ecosystem, FE – forest ecosystem, ME – meadow ecosystem
Mean absorbance values with standard deviation and coefficients of absorbance of humic acids
| Soils | Ecosystems | 280 nm | 400 nm | 465 nm | 600 nm | 665 nm | A2/4 | A2/6 | A4/6 | ΔlogK4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch1 | AE | 3.94±0.123 | 2.24±0.17 | 1.32±0.03 | 0.551±0.034 | 0.300±0.014 | 2.98b2 | 13.1b | 4.40b | 0.609b |
| FE | 2.73±0.2 | 1.04±0.06 | 0.571±0.026 | 0.156±0.005 | 0.084±0.003 | 4.78a | 32.5a | 6.80a | 0.824a | |
| ME | 3.70±0.06 | 1.43±0.11 | 0.740±0.046 | 0.211±0.014 | 0.112±0.006 | 5.00a | 33.0a | 6.61a | 0.831a | |
| Lu | AE | 4.39±0.30 | 2.03±0.15 | 1.26±0.05 | 0.490±0.046 | 0.276±0.013 | 3.48b | 15.9b | 4.57b | 0.617b |
| FE | 4.50±0.09 | 2.04±0.14 | 1.20±0.09 | 0.497±0.024 | 0.276±0.016 | 3.75b | 16.3b | 4.35b | 0.613b | |
| ME | 3.90±0.13 | 1.61±0.13 | 0.960±0.061 | 0.350±0.022 | 0.191±0.007 | 4.06a | 20.4a | 5.03a | 0.663a | |
| Pl | AE | 3.25±0.14 | 1.11±0.07 | 0.616±0.008 | 0.199±0.014 | 0.097±0.003 | 5.28a | 33.5b | 6.35a | 0.746c |
| FE | 3.15±0.06 | 1.03±0.07 | 0.564±0.018 | 0.178±0.008 | 0.085±0.006 | 5.59a | 37.1a | 6.64a | 0.762b | |
| ME | 3.15±0.04 | 1.10±0.06 | 0.582±0.016 | 0.178±0.002 | 0.085±0.002 | 5.41a | 37.1a | 6.85a | 0.791a | |
| Ca | AE | 2.77±0.15 | 0.97±0.07 | 0.443±0.046 | 0.134±0.009 | 0.064±0.004 | 6.25a | 43.3a | 6.92a | 0.860a |
| FE | 3.23±0.07 | 1.12±0.11 | 0.591±0.012 | 0.172±0.007 | 0.084±0.003 | 5.47b | 38.5b | 7.04a | 0.814b | |
| ME | 3.68±0.07 | 1.31±0.04 | 0.700±0.046 | 0.221±0.023 | 0.111±0.004 | 5.26b | 33.2c | 6.31b | 0.773c |
1Ch Chernozem, Lu Luvisol, Pl Planosol, Ca Cambisol, AE agricultural ecosystem, FE forest ecosystem, ME meadow ecosystem
2Values followed by a lowercase letter are not significantly different at 5%
3Standard deviation (n=3)
4ΔlogK = log A400 - log A600
Fig. 3Selected RP-HPLC chromatogram of humic acids of Chernozem under agricultural use
Mean share of hydrophilic and hydrophobic fractions with standard deviation, total share of hydrophobic fractions (ΣHOB), and values of HIL/ΣHOB ratio of humic acids
| Soils | Ecosystems | HIL4 | HOB-1 | HOB-2 | HOB-3 | ∑HOB | HIL/∑HOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch1 | AE | 19.74±0.443 | 24.26±0.64 | 28.17±0.16 | 27.83±0.25 | 80.26a2 | 0.246b |
| FE | 29.46±2.23 | 70.54±2.15 | nd | nd | 70.54b | 0.418a | |
| ME | 29.19±1.75 | 27.24±0.77 | 24.77±1.00 | 18.80±0.57 | 70.81b | 0.412a | |
| Lu | AE | 17.75±1.25 | 26.28±1.31 | 30.59±1.51 | 25.37±1.48 | 82.25a | 0.216b |
| FE | 15.90±0.79 | 26.17±1.01 | 31.44±1.73 | 26.49±1.11 | 84.10a | 0.189c | |
| ME | 25.46±1.27 | 21.08±1.37 | 27.30±1.31 | 26.16±1.01 | 74.54b | 0.341a | |
| Pl | AE | 23.61±1.20 | 24.18±1.17 | 28.63±1.27 | 23.57±1.28 | 76.39a | 0.309b |
| FE | 27.53±1.56 | 21.01±1.60 | 26.02±1.41 | 25.44±1.15 | 72.47b | 0.380a | |
| ME | 22.90±1.22 | 25.43±1.67 | 29.66±1.16 | 22.01±0.72 | 77.10a | 0.297b | |
| Ca | AE | 25.67±1.33 | 74.33±.133 | nd | nd | 74.33b | 0.345a |
| FE | 25.19±1.19 | 24.65±1.43 | 28.36±1.21 | 21.80±1.22 | 74.81b | 0.337a | |
| ME | 22.17±1.4 | 25.83±1.71 | 30.47±1.16 | 21.53±0.93 | 77.83a | 0.285b |
1Ch Chernozem, Lu Luvisol, Pl Planosol, Ca Cambisol, AE agricultural ecosystem, FE forest ecosystem, ME meadow ecosystem
2Values followed by a lower-case letter are not significantly different at 5%
3Standard deviation (n=3)
4HIL the share of hydrophilic fraction, HOB the share of hydrophobic fraction
nd non-detectable (below detection limit)
Fig. 4FT-IR spectra of humic acids of Planosol (Pl) showing the dependence of transmittance (T) on the wavenumber; a in the range from 3600 to 2500 cm−1, b in the range from 1800 to 1000 cm−1 (AE – agri-ecosystem, FE – forest ecosystem, ME – meadow ecosystem). Assignment of peaks (bands), see Table 5
List of peaks (bands) present in FT-IR spectra
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment1 |
|---|---|
| 3400–3100 | O-H stretching of alcohols, phenols and acids, N-H stretching |
| 3100–3000 | C-H groups of aromatic and alicyclic compounds |
| 2960–2920; 2850 | asymmetric and symmetric C-H stretching of CH3 and CH2 group |
| 1730–1710 | C = O stretching of carboxyl, aldehyde, ketone group |
| 1660–1620 | C = O of stretching of amide groups; N-H deformation |
| 1610–1600 | C – C stretching of aromatic rings |
| 1550–1530 | N-H deformation, C = N stretching (amide II bands) |
| 1520–1500 | C-C stretching of aromatic rings |
| 1460–1440 | C-H asymmetric of CH3 and CH2 |
| 1420–1400 | C-O stretching and OH deformation of phenols |
| 1380–1320 | C-N aromatic amine, COO-, C-H stretching |
| 1280–1200 | C-O stretching of aryl ethers, esters and phenols |
| 1160–1030 | C-O stretching alcohols, ethers and polysaccharides |
1Enev et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2017; Hayes and Swift 2018
Fig. 5Cluster analysis determined based on humic acid parameters (1 – Chernozem, 2 – Luvisol, 3 – Planosol, 4 – Cambisol, AE – agri-ecosystem, FE – forest ecosystem, ME – meadow ecosystem)
Correlations between the particle size distribution content (%) and basic parameters of humic acids
| C | H | H/C | ω | A280 | A665 | A2/4 | A2/6 | A4/6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0.790* | −0.728* | −0.745* | 0.642* | 0.597* | 0.620* | −0.733* | −0.719* | −0.631* |
| Silt | 0.579* | −0.469 | −0.538* | 0.321 | 0.498 | 0.406 | −0.305 | −0.335 | −0.378 |
| Sand | −0.760* | 0.597* | 0.667* | −0.448 | −0.585* | −0.514 | 0.481 | 0.481 | 0.493 |
*Significant correlations for p ≤ 0.05