Literature DB >> 27232639

Penetrating Colorectal Injuries: Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector CT with Trajectography.

David Dreizin1, Alexis R Boscak1, Michael J Anstadt1, Nikki Tirada1, William C Chiu1, Felipe Munera1, Uttam K Bodanapally1, Michael Hornick1, Deborah M Stein1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (CT) with trajectography for penetrating colorectal injuries. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant study was a 6-year blinded retrospective review by two independent readers of 182 consecutive patients who preoperatively underwent 40- or 64-row multidetector CT for penetrating torso trauma below the diaphragm and had surgically confirmed findings. Colorectal perforation was present in 42 patients. Trajectory analysis with postprocessing software was used for all studies. Additional signs evaluated were rectal contrast agent leak, collections of extruded fecal material, mural defect, wall thickening, abnormal enhancement, free fluid or stranding, and free air. The quality of the colorectal contrast agent administration was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), and Cohen κ were determined. Results In patients with rectal contrast agent administration (n = 151), AUCs were 0.90-0.91, which indicated excellent accuracy. Trajectory was sensitive (88%-91%). For single wounds (n = 104), sensitivity of trajectory was 96% for both readers, but was only 80% for multiple wounds (n = 47). Contrast agent leak was highly specific (96%-98%), but insensitive (42%-46%). Improved diagnostic performance was observed in patients with poor colonic distension or opacification. Accuracy remained high (AUC, 0.86-0.99) in the group without rectal contrast agent administration (n = 31). Conclusion Trajectory had excellent sensitivity, while rectal contrast agent leak was specific but insensitive. Sensitivity of trajectory was lower for multiple wounds. Accuracy remained high in patients without rectal contrast agent administration. © RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27232639     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015152335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  An international survey to assess use of oral and rectal contrast in CT protocols for penetrating torso trauma.

Authors:  Cory J Ozimok; Vincent M Mellnick; Michael N Patlas
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-10-21

2.  A Multiscale Deep Learning Method for Quantitative Visualization of Traumatic Hemoperitoneum at CT: Assessment of Feasibility and Comparison with Subjective Categorical Estimation.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Yuyin Zhou; Shuhao Fu; Yan Wang; Guang Li; Kathryn Champ; Eliot Siegel; Ze Wang; Tina Chen; Alan L Yuille
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-11

3.  Diagnostic performance of triple-contrast versus single-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for the evaluation of penetrating bowel injury.

Authors:  Fabio M Paes; Anthony M Durso; Denver S Pinto; Brian Covello; Douglas S Katz; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-03-23

4.  CT of Penetrating Abdominopelvic Trauma.

Authors:  Muhammad Naeem; Mark J Hoegger; Frank W Petraglia; David H Ballard; Maria Zulfiqar; Michael N Patlas; Constantine Raptis; Vincent M Mellnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.312

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.