Literature DB >> 27231842

Improving Walking with an Implanted Neuroprosthesis for Hip, Knee, and Ankle Control After Stroke.

Nathaniel S Makowski1, Rudi Kobetic, Lisa M Lombardo, Kevin M Foglyano, Gilles Pinault, Stephen M Selkirk, Ronald J Triolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to quantify the effects of a fully implanted pulse generator to activate or augment actions of hip, knee, and ankle muscles after stroke.
DESIGN: The subject was a 64-year-old man with left hemiparesis resulting from hemorrhagic stroke 21 months before participation. He received an 8-channel implanted pulse generator and intramuscular stimulating electrodes targeting unilateral hip, knee, and ankle muscles on the paretic side. After implantation, a stimulation pattern was customized to assist with hip, knee, and ankle movement during gait.The subject served as his own concurrent and longitudinal control with and without stimulation. Outcome measures included 10-m walk and 6-minute timed walk to assess gait speed, maximum walk time, and distance to measure endurance, and quantitative motion analysis to evaluate spatial-temporal characteristics. Assessments were repeated under 3 conditions: (1) volitional walking at baseline, (2) volitional walking after training, and (3) walking with stimulation after training.
RESULTS: Volitional gait speed improved with training from 0.29 m/s to 0.35 m/s and further increased to 0.72 m/s with stimulation. Most spatial-temporal characteristics improved and represented more symmetrical and dynamic gait.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a multijoint approach to implanted neuroprostheses can provide clinically relevant improvements in gait after stroke. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME
OBJECTIVES: : Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to do the following: (1) Describe the rationale for evaluating a multijoint implanted neuroprosthesis to improvewalkingafter stroke; (2)Understand the study design and conclusions that can be inferred as a result of the design; and (3) Discuss the statistical significance and clinical relevance of changes between (a) volitional walking at baseline, (b) volitional walking after training, and (c) walking with stimulation after training. LEVEL: Advanced ACCREDITATION:: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27231842      PMCID: PMC5115927          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  29 in total

1.  Manual muscle testing.

Authors:  J R Mendell; J Florence
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  T George Hornby; Donielle D Campbell; Jennifer H Kahn; Tobey Demott; Jennifer L Moore; Heidi R Roth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator for versatile control of paralyzed muscle.

Authors:  B Smith; P H Peckham; M W Keith; D D Roscoe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  Julie K Tilson; Katherine J Sullivan; Steven Y Cen; Dorian K Rose; Cherisha H Koradia; Stanley P Azen; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-12-18

6.  Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Francois Bethoux; Helen L Rogers; Karen J Nolan; Gary M Abrams; Thiru Annaswamy; Murray Brandstater; Barbara Browne; Judith M Burnfield; Wuwei Feng; Mitchell J Freed; Carolyn Geis; Jason Greenberg; Mark Gudesblatt; Farha Ikramuddin; Arun Jayaraman; Steven A Kautz; Helmi L Lutsep; Sangeetha Madhavan; Jill Meilahn; William S Pease; Noel Rao; Subramani Seetharama; Pramod Sethi; Margaret A Turk; Roi Ann Wallis; Conrad Kufta
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature.

Authors:  N Arene; J Hidler
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.119

8.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.

Authors:  J Perry; M Garrett; J K Gronley; S J Mulroy
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful.

Authors:  Arlene Schmid; Pamela W Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Sue Min Lai; Lorie Richards; Subashan Perera; Samuel S Wu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Prevalence of spasticity post stroke.

Authors:  C L Watkins; M J Leathley; J M Gregson; A P Moore; T L Smith; A K Sharma
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.477

View more
  3 in total

1.  Design and Testing of Stimulation and Myoelectric Recording Modules in an Implanted Distributed Neuroprosthetic System.

Authors:  Nathaniel Makowski; Alexandru Campean; Joris Lambrecht; James Buckett; James Coburn; Ronald Hart; Michael Miller; Fred Montague; Timothy Crish; Michael Fu; Kevin Kilgore; P Hunter Peckham; Brian Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.234

2.  Long-Term Performance and User Satisfaction With Implanted Neuroprostheses for Upright Mobility After Paraplegia: 2- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Kevin M Foglyano; Rudi Kobetic; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Gilles Pinault
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Oxygen Consumption While Walking With Multijoint Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Stroke.

Authors:  Nathaniel S Makowski; Rudi Kobetic; Kevin M Foglyano; Lisa M Lombardo; Stephen M Selkirk; Gilles Pinault; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.412

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.