| Literature DB >> 27231705 |
Hirotomo Saitsu1, Masaki Sonoda2, Takefumi Higashijima2, Hiroshi Shirozu2, Hiroshi Masuda2, Jun Tohyama3, Mitsuhiro Kato4, Mitsuko Nakashima5, Yoshinori Tsurusaki6, Takeshi Mizuguchi5, Satoko Miyatake5, Noriko Miyake5, Shigeki Kameyama2, Naomichi Matsumoto5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) is a congenital anomalous brain tumor. Although most HHs are found without any other systemic features, HH is observed in syndromic disorders such as Pallister-Hall syndrome (PHS) and oral-facial-digital syndrome (OFD). Here, we explore the possible involvement of somatic mutations in HH.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27231705 PMCID: PMC4863748 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Summary of the clinical features and genetic data for 18 individuals with hypothalamic hamartoma
| Individual | Sex | Digit anomaly | Oral anomaly | Maximum diameter of HH (mm) | Other brain anomalies | Mean read depth (Blood/Tumor) | UnifiedGenotyper | MuTect/Varscan2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germline Mutation | Somatic Mutation | Focused four candidate genes | |||||||
| 8505 | F | – | – | 18 | – | 188/150 | – | – | – |
| 8931 | M | – | – | 16 | – | 190/136 | – | – | – |
| 8990 | F | Polysyndactyly in bil. H and Ft | Multiple frenula | 22 | – | 91/– |
| – | – |
| 9355 | M | – | – | 14 | – | 192/152 | – |
| – |
| 9877 | M | – | – | 17 | – | 210/179 | – | – | – |
| 10104 | F | – | – | 34 | Subependymal PH, pachygyria lissencephaly, cyst in HH | 142/171 | – | – | – |
| 10283 | M | – | – | 19 | – | 143/145 | – | – |
|
| 10658 | M | – | – | 17 | – | 152/135 | – | – | – |
| 10743 | M | – | – | 13 | – | 161/135 | – |
| – |
| 10875 | F | – | N.D. | 21 | – | 145/137 | – |
| – |
| 11392 | M | – | N.D. | 22 | – | 162/142 | – | – | – |
| 12118 | M | Polydactyly in bil. Ft | N.D. | 10 | Multiple arachnoid cysts in posterior cranial fossa | 78/69 | – |
| – |
| 12574 | F | – | – | 30 | – | 163/150 | – | – | – |
| 12618 | M | – | – | 30 | – | 213/174 | – |
| – |
| 12676 | M | – | – | 19 | – | 206/142 | – | – | – |
| 12698 | F | – | – | 15 | ACC, MTS | 87/96 | – |
| – |
| 13606 | F | – | – | 28 | – | 78/85 | – | – | – |
| 14024 | F | Syndactyly in bil. H, duplicated hallux | Lobulated tongue, cleft lower lip | 25 | ACC, heterotopias,Multiple interhemispheric cysts, Dandy–walker malformation | 72/– |
| – | – |
N.D., not described; F, female; M, male; HH, Hypothalamic Hamartoma; bil., bilateral; H, Hands; Ft, Feet; PH, periventricular heterotopias; MTS, Molar tooth sign; ACC, agenesis of corpus callosum.
Figure 1Experimental flow chart for detecting somatic mutations in individuals with hypothalamic hamartoma. The flow of analysis in this study is outlined.
Figure 2Germline and somatic mutations in and oral‐facial‐digital syndrome (. Schematic representation of (A) GLI3 and (B) OFD1 proteins and the identified mutations. (A) Repressor domain, zinc‐finger DNA binding domain (ZNF), transcription activation domains 1 and 2 (TA1 and TA2)16 of GLI3 are shown. Consistent with previous reports5, 8, 10, one germline and two somatic truncation mutations in were located in the middle third of GLI3 (667–1161aa, dashed box). (B) Three coiled coil domains and a LIS1 homology domain (LisH) of OFD1 are shown (UniProt KB, O75665). Truncation mutations in prior to Asn630 have been reported to cause OFD type I in females and embryonic lethality in males16, 39. All the identified mutations caused truncations prior to Asn630 (dashed line). Somatic mutations are colored blue with mutant allele frequency (mutant allele reads/total reads) examined by deep sequencing of target amplicons. All somatic mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing, except for 10283. (C) Coronal and (D) transverse T1‐weighted images of 14024, and (E, F) coronal T1‐weighted images of 12118. 14024 with a germline mutation, showed hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) (white arrowheads), multiple interhemispheric cysts (asterisk), interhemispheric fluid collection, subcortical heterotopias (red arrows), and agenesis of corpus callosum, whereas 12118 with a somatic mutation showed HH and an arachnoid cyst in posterior cranial fossa (black arrowheads). (G) Luciferase assays in C3H10T1/2 cells. Fold increase in luciferase activity comparing 8 × mis3′GliBS‐reporter to 8 × 3′GliBS‐reporter that correlates with the degree of transcriptional suppression of GLI3 protein is shown. Wild‐type GLI3 suppress transcription of the reporter construct compared with two control vectors (pCIG and pCIG‐αII‐spectrin). Two mutant GLI3 alleles (His777Argfs*25 and Arg1058*) showed stronger repressor activity than wild type. *P < 0.01 by nonrepeated Measures ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test. Error bars, S.D.
Summary of mutant allele ratios of detected germline and somatic mutations in GLI3 and OFD1
| Individual | Germline mutation | Somatic mutation | Sanger Validation | Whole‐exome sequencing | Variant‐targeted amplicon sequencing (Validation) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamartoma | Blood | Hamartoma | Blood | Hair | Nail | Mother | ||||
| Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | Mut/Ref counts (% | ||||
| 8990 |
| Yes | – | 72/142 (33.6) | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 9355 | – |
| Yes | 7/15 (31.8) | 0/14 (0.0) | 10907/32157 (25.33) | 4050/120546 (3.25 | 4474/124633 (3.46 | 3764/114101 (3.2 | 3729/109893 (3.39 |
| 10283 | – |
| Not visible | 6/62 (8.82) | 0/67 (0.0) | 2120/25712 (7.62) | 26/40690 (0.06) | – | – | 11/30211 (0.04) |
| 10743 | – |
| Yes | 74/176 (29.6) | 1/249 (0.4) | 30056/44136 (40.5) | 34/49287 (0.07) | 82/50866 (0.16) | 86/63705 (0.13) | 34/73648 (0.05) |
| 10875 | – |
| Yes | 20/93 (17.7) | 0/127 (0.0) | – | – | – | – | – |
| 12118 | – |
| Yes | 18/29 (31.6) | 0/39 (0.0) | 71037/59153 (54.6) | 33/8237 (0.4) | 6/102177 (0.01) | 2/88981 (0.00) | 2/100955 (0.00) |
| 12618 | – |
| Yes | 24/63 (27.6) | 0/98 (0.0) | 49095/126117 (28.0) | 1/14277 (0.01) | 8/135421 (0.01) | 4/230460 (0.00) | 5/147780 (0.00) |
| 12698 | – |
| Yes | 19/109 (14.8) | 0/109 (0.0) | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14024 |
| Yes | – | 11/7 (61.1) | – | – | – | – | – | |
Percent of mutant allele was calculated by mutant allele reads/(mutant allele reads + reference allele reads).
The high background error rates in these samples were caused by neighboring poly(A) sequences.