Rosemarie Marchan1. 1. Leibniz Institut für Arbeitsforschung an der TU Dortmund, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Recently, Schmidt and colleagues reported that immunoglobulin Kappa C (IGKC) predicts a favourable response to chemotherapy and better metastasis-free survival in breast cancerpatients (Schmidt et al., 2012[14]). The authors validated the prognostic and predictive role of IGKC in 1,810 breast cancer, 1,056 non-small cell lung cancer and 513 colorectal cancerpatient samples. The identification of IGKC as a single and robust marker of the immune response represents a major progress in the field of clinical tumour immunology and biomarkers. During the past decades, the search for prognostic and predictive markers of humantumours represented a major research focus (Perou et al., 2000[10]; Desmedt et al., 2007[3]; Cadenas et al., 2010[2]; Hellwig et al., 2010[5]; Kammers et al., 2011[7]; Hardelauf et al., 2011[4]; Lee et al., 2010[8]; Mariani et al., 2010[9]). The prognostic relevance of proliferation-associated genes (Schmidt et al., 2009[15][17], 2011[16]) and - in breast cancer - gene signatures associated with steroid hormone receptors and ERBB2 has been consistently demonstrated (Desmedt et al., 2007[3]; Brase et al., 2010[1]; Petry et al., 2010[11]). In contrast, the role of the immune system remained controversial. On the one hand, experimental and animal studies suggest that the humoral immune system may stimulate tumour growth, possibly by cytokine secretion (Tan and Coussens, 2008[18]; Inoue et al., 2006[6]; review: Schmidt et al., 2009[15]). However, several reports speculated that antibodies secreted after B-cell expansion may also control tumour growth by aiding destruction of tumour cells (review: Schmidt et al., 2010[13]; 2011[16]). Only as recently as 2008, was it finally made clear that a B-cell/plasma cell metagene, indicating infiltration of tumours with plasma cells, is associated with better prognosis in breast cancer (Schmidt et al., 2008[12]). This effect is stronger in fast proliferating carcinomas. In this study, a metagene consisting of 60 individual genes was used to evaluate plasma cell infiltration. In the clinic however, routine determination of a 60-gene signature would be too laborious. Therefore, the major breakthrough of the large validation study is that the 60-gene B-cell/plasma cell metagene can be replaced by a single robust marker without loss of prognostic/predictive power: IGKC (Schmidt et al., 2012[14]). The key messages of the study are:IGKC is associated with good prognosis in breast, lung and colon cancersIGKC indicates tumour-infiltrating plasma cellsBesides its prognostic relevance in patients who did not receive systemic chemotherapy, IGKC also predicts favourable responses to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancerIGKC can be detected immunohistochemically in paraffin slides using commercially available antibodies. Alternatively, it can be measured by qRT-PCR using RNA isolated from fresh frozen tumour tissue or from paraffin material. Immunostaining results and RNA expression levels correlate, and the high expression of IGKC obtained using both techniques is similarly associated with better prognosis.Currently, there are no alternative markers available for the humoral immune system; therefore, IGKC is likely to play a central role as a prognostic and predictive factor of solid carcinomas.
Authors: Melissa M Mariani; Lindsey J Maccoux; Christian Matthäus; Max Diem; Jan G Hengstler; Volker Deckert Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Heike Hardelauf; Jean-Philippe Frimat; Joanna D Stewart; Wiebke Schormann; Ya-Yu Chiang; Peter Lampen; Joachim Franzke; Jan G Hengstler; Cristina Cadenas; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart; Jonathan West Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: Christine Desmedt; Fanny Piette; Sherene Loi; Yixin Wang; Françoise Lallemand; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Yi Zhang; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian L Harris; Jan G M Klijn; John A Foekens; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart; Marc Buyse; Christos Sotiriou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marcus Schmidt; Ilka Brigitte Petry; Daniel Böhm; Antje Lebrecht; Christian von Törne; Susanne Gebhard; Aslihan Gerhold-Ay; Cristina Cotarelo; Marco Battista; Wiebke Schormann; Evgenia Freis; Silvia Selinski; Katja Ickstadt; Jörg Rahnenführer; Martin Sebastian; Martin Schuler; Heinz Koelbl; Mathias Gehrmann; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Schmidt; A Victor; D Bratzel; D Boehm; C Cotarelo; A Lebrecht; W Siggelkow; J G Hengstler; A Elsässer; M Gehrmann; H-A Lehr; H Koelbl; G von Minckwitz; N Harbeck; C Thomssen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-09-29 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Cristina Cadenas; Dennis Franckenstein; Marcus Schmidt; Mathias Gehrmann; Matthias Hermes; Bettina Geppert; Wiebke Schormann; Lindsey J Maccoux; Markus Schug; Anika Schumann; Christian Wilhelm; Evgenia Freis; Katja Ickstadt; Jörg Rahnenführer; Jörg I Baumbach; Albert Sickmann; Jan G Hengstler Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Marcus Schmidt; Daniel Böhm; Christian von Törne; Eric Steiner; Alexander Puhl; Henryk Pilch; Hans-Anton Lehr; Jan G Hengstler; Heinz Kölbl; Mathias Gehrmann Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701